ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

direwolf · 1 August 2020, 10:59 AM

Simply perfect imho

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

subprimero · 1 August 2020, 11:28 AM

14060m for your wrist size.

Breizh · 1 August 2020, 11:38 AM

At the end of the day you have to try them on.
Pictures can’t tell the whole story.
I always thought I’d prefer the 5 digit until I tried them both, and to my surprise I much preferred the maxi case (165mm wrist). Funny thing is I still think the older one looks better in pictures.

timlaw · 1 August 2020, 06:31 PM

why pay a premium for a NOS 14060M if the intention is to wear it? save a few $000 and buy a mint full set watch will be my route

spacedinvader · 1 August 2020, 06:45 PM

Just one vote in it now. As expected while our bigger and brasher cousins west of the Atlantic sleep the slimmer 14060 sees a surge of votes from slighter Asians and understated Europeans. Expect maxicase rebound at about 1400 Zulu.
(Just a lighthearted bit of casual stereotyping for you there. )

mailman · 1 August 2020, 06:48 PM

Love both. The 14060M is as great a watch as there is. However for me, the maxi dial/hands and larger profile give the 114060 a slight edge for me. YMMV

eskiserkan · 1 August 2020, 07:26 PM

Go for the 14060 you will regret not buying it in the future. Getting less every other day in the market.

travisb · 1 August 2020, 09:39 PM

I really enjoyed owning the 14060m but once the 114060 was introduced I fell for the new changes - ceramic bezel, glidelock. super case, chromalight etc.
Many still prefer the 5 digit and rightfully so. It's a great reference. Just not for me.

brandrea · 1 August 2020, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FTX I

I voted 6 digit but I love both.

Always great to see your pics my friend. Best of both worlds right there

4vCoupe · 1 August 2020, 10:05 PM

The answer is easy. Both!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

1William · 1 August 2020, 10:31 PM

I voted for the newer model but it depends on your wrist size. Try them on before you buy. It will make all of the difference.

FTX I · 1 August 2020, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brandrea

Always great to see your pics my friend. Best of both worlds right there

Thanks buddy. Hope you have a great weekend.

m j b · 1 August 2020, 11:17 PM

I have owned both. You can't go wrong either way, but if money were no object, I'd get the 14060M.

I say "no object" because I think the going market price is too high, which is why I don't currently own one.

huba01 · 1 August 2020, 11:45 PM

Easy for me, 14060M

WatchNutcase · 2 August 2020, 12:54 AM

114060 all day baby. This is coming from a guy with small wrists (6.5) and I had both side by side when I chose. While the 5 digit wore a hair smaller the improvement in quality of the 6 digit was much better. Both are classics and will remain so deep into the future.

Nikrnic · 2 August 2020, 03:25 AM

I have both. I bought my 114060 new in 2017 and recently purchased an unworn 14060M random ser. from the original owner one year ago. Its still a safe queen for now but I'd give it the edge over the new one if I had to choose one.[IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200801/fabcbfa28a2b76fa6055e4e687b38ff0.jpg
My 7" wrist[/IMG]

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

My 7" wrist.

View Poll Results: Which one would you purchase? Both are new!
114060	66	49.62%
14060M	67	50.38%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

1 August 2020, 10:59 AM	#31
direwolf "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Watch: 16610 Posts: 472	Simply perfect imho Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Inspiration move me brightly

1 August 2020, 06:31 PM	#34
timlaw "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Tim Location: Worcestershire,UK Watch: Coke 16710 Posts: 894	why pay a premium for a NOS 14060M if the intention is to wear it? save a few $000 and buy a mint full set watch will be my route __________________ Tim. 124060 Submariner, 16710 Coke, 16570 Black dial, Datejust 41 Wimbledon dial, Tudor Black Bay GMT, Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue, Tudor Black Bay 58 925, Tudor Prince Date Chronograph (panda dial)

1 August 2020, 06:48 PM	#36
mailman TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: . Watch: 126610LN Posts: 35,510	Love both. The 14060M is as great a watch as there is. However for me, the maxi dial/hands and larger profile give the 114060 a slight edge for me. YMMV __________________ JJ

1 August 2020, 11:17 PM	#43
m j b "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Michael Location: RTP, NC, USA Watch: ♕& Ω Posts: 5,215	I have owned both. You can't go wrong either way, but if money were no object, I'd get the 14060M. I say "no object" because I think the going market price is too high, which is why I don't currently own one. __________________ Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds...

1 August 2020, 11:28 AM	#32
subprimero "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: John Location: Texas Watch: 14060 Posts: 3,434	14060m for your wrist size.

1 August 2020, 11:38 AM	#33
Breizh "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2020 Location: California/France Posts: 331	At the end of the day you have to try them on. Pictures can’t tell the whole story. I always thought I’d prefer the 5 digit until I tried them both, and to my surprise I much preferred the maxi case (165mm wrist). Funny thing is I still think the older one looks better in pictures.

1 August 2020, 06:45 PM	#35
spacedinvader "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: London Posts: 148	Just one vote in it now. As expected while our bigger and brasher cousins west of the Atlantic sleep the slimmer 14060 sees a surge of votes from slighter Asians and understated Europeans. Expect maxicase rebound at about 1400 Zulu. (Just a lighthearted bit of casual stereotyping for you there. )

1 August 2020, 07:26 PM	#37
eskiserkan "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Bursa Watch: 116500LN Posts: 493	Go for the 14060 you will regret not buying it in the future. Getting less every other day in the market.

1 August 2020, 09:39 PM	#38
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,449	I really enjoyed owning the 14060m but once the 114060 was introduced I fell for the new changes - ceramic bezel, glidelock. super case, chromalight etc. Many still prefer the 5 digit and rightfully so. It's a great reference. Just not for me.

1 August 2020, 10:05 PM	#40
4vCoupe "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: USA Watch: GMT Master 16750 Posts: 795	The answer is easy. Both! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

1 August 2020, 10:31 PM	#41
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,676	I voted for the newer model but it depends on your wrist size. Try them on before you buy. It will make all of the difference.

1 August 2020, 11:45 PM	#44
huba01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Dubai Posts: 1,449	Easy for me, 14060M

2 August 2020, 12:54 AM	#45
WatchNutcase Banned Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Matt Location: UK / EU & Canada Watch: Sub 114060 Posts: 1,349	114060 all day baby. This is coming from a guy with small wrists (6.5) and I had both side by side when I chose. While the 5 digit wore a hair smaller the improvement in quality of the 6 digit was much better. Both are classics and will remain so deep into the future.

2 August 2020, 03:25 AM	#46
Nikrnic "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Real Name: Louis Nick Ric Location: Michigan, USA Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs, Posts: 10,171	I have both. I bought my 114060 new in 2017 and recently purchased an unworn 14060M random ser. from the original owner one year ago. Its still a safe queen for now but I'd give it the edge over the new one if I had to choose one.[IMG]https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200801/fabcbfa28a2b76fa6055e4e687b38ff0.jpg My 7" wrist[/IMG] Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk My 7" wrist.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)