The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 September 2020, 10:02 AM   #31
2nastie
"TRF" Member
 
2nastie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
Congrats! Maybe I'll spot it in the wild if you are in YVR! Hahaha

2nastie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 10:27 AM   #32
ndls
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Vancouver/Seattle
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nastie View Post
Congrats! Maybe I'll spot it in the wild if you are in YVR! Hahaha

Totally! Although, there are a lot of subs in Vancouver...a lot haha
ndls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 10:28 AM   #33
whited3
"TRF" Member
 
whited3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: USA
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 390
Rare or not I'm just going to hang onto mine. It really hits a natural sweet spot in the Rolex range. Easy choice when in doubt. Under the radar, but quite special.
whited3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 11:05 AM   #34
rmlovett1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,509
Congrats!
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:22 PM   #35
HACKNSACK44
"TRF" Member
 
HACKNSACK44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Orlando
Watch: 114060
Posts: 8,450
Congrats!!
__________________
114060
HACKNSACK44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:24 PM   #36
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
Best modern diver made by Rolex, imho.
It wasn't even loved or liked when released. It was doing very bad on sales and was easily available over 25% discounted on new. Once discontinued, it suddenly it becomes the best modern diver by Rolex and also rare!
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:25 PM   #37
nosignalbmwdriver
"TRF" Member
 
nosignalbmwdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Ontario
Watch: TT Skydwelli
Posts: 850
How is this rare?
nosignalbmwdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:32 PM   #38
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndls View Post
Hey there,

I managed to get mine for 13500 usd. I know it's a lot, but it's a local watch, full set, very well taken care by a local collector, and helped scratch the itch for a diver that had a bit of heft without the size increase. I was on the list for an SD43, but I found it too big. I love that this one actually looks like the new 12x subs - slim lugs, 40mm, 20mm lug-to-lug. It's awesome.
Thank you for that! Definitely a hefty sum, but main point is you’re happy!
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:34 PM   #39
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
It wasn't even loved or liked when released. It was doing very bad on sales and was easily available over 25% discounted on new. Once discontinued, it suddenly it becomes the best modern diver by Rolex and also rare!
You obviously don't agree. That's perfectly fine. That being said, sales performance hardly corresponds to the inherent merits of an object. I'm sure you're aware Paul Newman Daytonas were terrible sellers during their tenure. I could go on.

Funny how you mention the reference not being "loved" as an argument here. I suppose we truly live in a time where hype is all that matters.

And rarity was never mentioned in my post.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:36 PM   #40
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
Its a better Proposition than the new subs and looks epic
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:38 PM   #41
Pte6000
2024 Pledge Member
 
Pte6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NC
Watch: GMT & a Jubilee
Posts: 672
I miss mine, will be a repurchase when I can make it happen.
Pte6000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 01:39 PM   #42
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post

Funny how you mention the reference not being "loved" as an argument here. I suppose we truly live in a time where hype is all that matters.

And rarity was never mentioned in my post.
Rarity is the post of this thread. Secondly, not talking about hype at all. I saw the watch in person, wasn't wowed by it. There was no need for external hype. It was short lugs and too fat wasn't even balanced IMO.

Just that date window floating somewhere on the dial is enough for me for getting bothered all day long!

Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 02:00 PM   #43
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
Rarity is the post of this thread. Secondly, not talking about hype at all. I saw the watch in person, wasn't wowed by it. There was no need for external hype. It was short lugs and too fat wasn't even balanced IMO.



Just that date window floating somewhere on the dial is enough for me for getting bothered all day long!



As mentioned before, your dislike for the reference is obvious, and that's fine.

Your argument that the watch began to be praised and appreciated as a consequence of its discontinuation is simply wrong. Anecdotally, I purchased my first submariner (116610, bnib) for close to 20% off several years ago. Was it hence "not loved"?

To each their own.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 09:25 PM   #44
mistermann
"TRF" Member
 
mistermann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Drew
Location: Iowa
Watch: 116600
Posts: 496
You've chosen wisely.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
mistermann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 09:34 PM   #45
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,127
Congratulations, great watch
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 09:51 PM   #46
MCOSUB
"TRF" Member
 
MCOSUB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: FLA
Watch: A Few
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
As mentioned before, your dislike for the reference is obvious, and that's fine.

Your argument that the watch began to be praised and appreciated as a consequence of its discontinuation is simply wrong. Anecdotally, I purchased my first submariner (116610, bnib) for close to 20% off several years ago. Was it hence "not loved"?

To each their own.
There would seem to me some merit to the argument. I used to see the SD4K in dealer cases all the time and I could have had it for a discount. Once they announced the discontinuation of the piece............they were all quickly sold and its desirability went shooting up, along with the prices.

I am not saying the watch is not an outstanding piece or that there aren't many that bought the watch for its looks and proportions........ but to ignore that it garnered more attention once it was discontinued seems a little blind to the facts.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 126600 MK1
Rolex GMT II 126710BLRO
Rolex Submariner 116610LV-C
Rolex Deep Blue Deep Sea Dweller 116660
Oris Great Barrier Reef #845/1000
MCOSUB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 09:59 PM   #47
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCOSUB View Post
to ignore that it garnered more attention once it was discontinued seems a little blind to the facts.
That could be said about the overwhelming majority of Rolex sports watches over the last several decades, which makes the original argument I was addressing, specifically aimed at the sd4k, factually incorrect.

This has strayed far enough from the original thread's intention. Enjoy that great piece, OP!
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2020, 10:01 PM   #48
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,976
My fav modern Rolex diver, shame it went so quickly.

Sd4k
Bb58
14060m
Nd sub current
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2020, 12:02 AM   #49
ndls
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Vancouver/Seattle
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by kauebm View Post
That could be said about the overwhelming majority of Rolex sports watches over the last several decades, which makes the original argument I was addressing, specifically aimed at the sd4k, factually incorrect.

This has strayed far enough from the original thread's intention. Enjoy that great piece, OP!
I enjoy the discussions and appreciate the passion. Sounds like a hobby to me

I’ll admit it’s a bit thick, but I chose it for that reason. I have a bit of a build so I wanted a watch that represented that a bit.

Anyways, thank you all for the congrats!
ndls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2020, 12:32 AM   #50
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCOSUB View Post
There would seem to me some merit to the argument. I used to see the SD4K in dealer cases all the time and I could have had it for a discount. Once they announced the discontinuation of the piece............they were all quickly sold and its desirability went shooting up, along with the prices.

I am not saying the watch is not an outstanding piece or that there aren't many that bought the watch for its looks and proportions........ but to ignore that it garnered more attention once it was discontinued seems a little blind to the facts.
Not to fan the flame with you guys...

But you could most certainly get a new SD4K for almost the exact same price as a new Sub Date from a grey back in 2016. Yet SD’s retail was much more. That says a lot about the desirability in my opinion.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2020, 01:32 AM   #51
Rohan1806
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 862
Congratulations!
Rohan1806 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.