The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 April 2021, 02:24 AM   #31
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
I vote air king :)
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 02:25 AM   #32
Gab27
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
It looks great. IMO, they could have kept the 39 in production as well. I imagine they are very different watches when on the wrist.
Gab27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 02:26 AM   #33
Santiago32
"TRF" Member
 
Santiago32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: UTC/GMT -7 hours
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky Rolex View Post
36mm for those with small wrists is my only thoughts. 39mm for me all day.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+1

I also like the text layout better on the 39mm.
__________________
instagram: santiagowatchcollector
Santiago32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 02:27 AM   #34
CLTRolex
"TRF" Member
 
CLTRolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Charlotte/London
Watch: Multiple
Posts: 889
36 is for a ladies wrist gents...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
♕ Daytona - 116506
♕ GMT-Master II - 116710BLNR
♕ Yacht-Master II - 116680
♕ Daytona - 116520
♕ Explorer II - 16570
CLTRolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 02:27 AM   #35
GolfJunkie
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GolfJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Eric
Location: USA
Watch: 252
Posts: 5,103
Only experience I have with 36mm watches is my wife's datejust and it's just too small for my wrist. I prefer the Explorer in the previous 39mm and am really glad I have one in my collection.
__________________
2FA Enabled
GolfJunkie is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 02:30 AM   #36
Flyfisher
"TRF" Member
 
Flyfisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 237
The 36mm looks like a toy.
Flyfisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:00 AM   #37
liberalclown
"TRF" Member
 
liberalclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Jan
Location: Earth
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLTRolex View Post
36 is for a ladies wrist gents...
Oh I didn't know Rolex sold all 36mm Explorers made from 1953 to 2010 to ladies.

Also the DD36s, also the DJ36s, also the OP 36s.
liberalclown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:06 AM   #38
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,298
That photo shows how the 39 just seems so much better and suited for purpose.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:07 AM   #39
Brich436
"TRF" Member
 
Brich436's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Watch: 124270
Posts: 984
Quote:
Originally Posted by CagKaly View Post
From Hodinkee Japan

I think they brought the classic design into the modern era brilliantly. To each his own tho.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
ROLEX: 16234-Datejust / 16570-Explorer 2 / 116610LN-Submariner / 124270-Explorer 1 / 126710BLNR-GMT-Master 2

TUDOR: M79030-B Black Bay 58 / M25717N-1 Pelagos FXD
Brich436 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:09 AM   #40
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberalclown View Post
Oh I didn't know Rolex sold all 36mm Explorers made from 1953 to 2010 to ladies.
36mm Explorer from 1959 to 2010. But 36mm in 1959 is HUGE watch and it was made to be big watch for Explorers. Now, you want 36mm as sports watch which is smaller for even dress watches? Hardly makes sense. Great if you think there is no change in watch sizes from 1959 to 2021.
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:12 AM   #41
JakeK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: USA
Watch: VCO
Posts: 785
I like both, but if given the choice would go with the 39mm because i don't like how cluttered the top half of the dial is on the 36.
JakeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:15 AM   #42
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
Crazy what 3mm can do..
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:16 AM   #43
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLTRolex View Post
36 is for a ladies wrist gents...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:26 AM   #44
doramas
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gran Canaria
Posts: 3,469
I prefer the 124270 36mm, but before that I prefer the 114270 36mm.
doramas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:44 AM   #45
nighthawk77
2024 Pledge Member
 
nighthawk77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,151
I’m used to wearing dive watches, 40-42mm, so the 39mm feels great to me. I’ve tried on DJ36s a few times in ADs and they always feel too small for my liking.

IMO both the 36mm and 39mm have their merits and i think it’s a shame both aren’t on offer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nighthawk77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 03:51 AM   #46
Brny11
"TRF" Member
 
Brny11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,460
It looks so small but awesome at same time. Really cool for Rolex to release the 36. Really wish they didn’t do the Gray market any favors with the 39mm (which I own) but that shouldn’t take away from the 2021 release.
Brny11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:18 AM   #47
wagoss122
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 26
I am not a fan of the Explorer nameplate upstairs. Happy for people that wanted the fit of a 36mm. Sad to see the 39mm range gone (for now).
wagoss122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:20 AM   #48
liberalclown
"TRF" Member
 
liberalclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Jan
Location: Earth
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxy View Post
Now, you want 36mm as sports watch which is smaller for even dress watches? Hardly makes sense.
Who's says so? It looked awesome back then and it still is.
Attached Images
 
liberalclown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:50 AM   #49
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
I own 35mm vintage watches, mostly on leather strap, but the Exp on the pic above is way too small IMHO.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:50 AM   #50
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgsooner View Post
If I were building the perfect Explorer it would be somewhere around 37.5-38mm. Given the choices available, neither are perfect. However for me the 39 is much closer to perfect than the 36. One of the things I love the most about my 39 is the matte dial, which is now sadly taken off of the table with the new 36.
Good analysis. I have a 39 but put my name in to add the 36. But I like vintage Explorers so I’m ok with the 36 size as well.
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:52 AM   #51
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by liberalclown View Post
Who's says so? It looked awesome back then and it still is.
Great vintage ad. I recall seeing that many years ago in National Geographic magazine and I’ve been smitten ever sense. The Explorer to me is the quintessential low key Rolex tool/sports watch.
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 04:53 AM   #52
Innocenti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 832
It’s just what your eye gets used too seeing.
Innocenti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 05:04 AM   #53
copperjohn
"TRF" Member
 
copperjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: john
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Exp
Posts: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by CagKaly View Post
From Hodinkee Japan
I’m curious about something. Why did they have to sandwich three lines of text in the upper half. There’s almost no spacing between the lines.
__________________
116610 | 214270 | 126710 | 16710
copperjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 05:57 AM   #54
Shay-J
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: U.K.
Watch: 124060
Posts: 72
Had the 39 but let it go, the size never felt right. Best get my name down, this could be the one watch collection (to go with the others ones 😉)
Shay-J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:01 AM   #55
marmite2005
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: UK
Watch: Slim wrist master
Posts: 697
New 36mm all day long, looks perfect proportions
marmite2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:11 AM   #56
ink3027
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
That photo shows how the 39 just seems so much better and suited for purpose.
Just curious -- suited for what purpose?
ink3027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:12 AM   #57
Shadow Play
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 676
I prefer the 39mm.
Shadow Play is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:31 AM   #58
Frank McKay
"TRF" Member
 
Frank McKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
His & hers, great pair.

Same thoughts. 39 was perfect proportionally.
Frank McKay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:49 AM   #59
ink3027
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank McKay View Post
Same thoughts. 39 was perfect proportionally.
The dial is too large on the 39mm. The proportions are much better on the 36mm.
ink3027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2021, 06:51 AM   #60
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,597
Proportionally I prefer the 36mm.

Not so easy to tell from pics but on the wrist, The downward curve of the lugs on the 39mm presents as the squared off lugs of the maxi case.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.