The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 August 2021, 05:11 AM   #31
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
The key word in the top sentence is "market." Rolex has their own science in how they market their watches. The OP41 is 39mm. The 40mm Daytona is just over 38mm. Agree it makes no sense and it has bothered me for years. I don't see other watch companies overtly lying about the dimensions of their watches but Rolex sees fit to do it. Rounding up to the nearest mm is fine, but marketing a 39 mm OP as a 41 is just blatant misrepresentation IMO.

As for 38 being perfect they can't make every model in 5 or 6 different sizes. They have a 36 and they have a 39.4. So if 38 is good for you we are only talking about 1.4mm difference here. I think most people are happy with one or the other. It wasn't real long ago that 36 was the largest they offered in a Datejust so I'm thrilled that folks like me with larger wrists at least have a larger option.
I hear ya, but they have made changes to the Sub size recently, the OP 41 size last year. I think they wouldn't be out of line making the 36 to 38mm...If not for the fact that 36mm is so classic... but so was the sub at 40mm.

I can wear 36mm, but the date just feels a tad small, even for me. I would bust down the doors for one in 38mm. Right now I'm being very non-comittal between the 36 and 41 and change my mind daily (since the Exp 39 has been discontinued). Not that I can get my hands on either anytime soon. I have tried both on in the past though, and as I mentioned, I was surprised at the 41...

But... I only did give it a try because I read on TRF here that it wasn't actually 41mm... so there's that.
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 05:15 AM   #32
HiBoost
"TRF" Member
 
HiBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
Respectfully disagree. They clearly want to market it as a 41 mm alternative to the 36, while at the same time keeping the actual diameter just over 39 which to my eyes is a perfect size. The 36 is always there for folks who feel the "41" is too large. I think they nailed it with the DJ41
I agree with all that. For the sake of discussion do we know what the DJ36 actually measures in the same dimension that you showed? I.e. is it a true 36 or is it 34.5 or something?
HiBoost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 06:05 AM   #33
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnuyork View Post
Respectfully, it makes no damn sense. Clearly, it's not 41mm, it's not even 40mm... so why market it as a 41 alternative?

What about folks that feel 41 is too big and 36 is too small... hence this thread. To me (my opinion), 38mm is perfect.

The 39mm actual diameter is not too bad though, I can wear it. Not a fan of the wider bezel, but I think it's more pronounced in pictures than on wrist.
What are the measurements from 4-10 or 2-8? Measuring along that axis will get some case/lug at the edges and probably stretch it beyond 40.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 06:34 AM   #34
winst
"TRF" Member
 
winst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 6,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
A 36mm & 38mm could be worn by both men & women. If a 39.4 mm DJ is the perfect size watch then why was the Explorer reduced back to 36mm from 39mm.
Because they wanted to tap in to the Asian Market and Women’s market more with the Explorer as I don’t believe they were selling that many 39mm’s compared to what they think they can with the 36mm. I still prefer the 39mm but that’s my personal preference.
winst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 09:00 AM   #35
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
36mm ; Rolex ; a good match.
If you want a bigger watch switch to other brands.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 10:32 AM   #36
dean_1nza
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Dean
Location: Dubai
Posts: 87
im on board for something in between the 36 and 41. As a workaround, I put a jubilee on my OP39 and couldn't be happier

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
dean_1nza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 11:22 AM   #37
zewill
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
So why isn’t is called the 39mm DJ?
Because it wears large and looks like a 40+mm watch

Honestly I do feel 2 mm does a difference. I would vote yes for a 38mm DJ.
zewill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 11:31 AM   #38
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
What are the measurements from 4-10 or 2-8? Measuring along that axis will get some case/lug at the edges and probably stretch it beyond 40.
I think that's how I've seen it measured at 39 and change, but I don't remember exactly.
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 12:26 PM   #39
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnuyork View Post
I think that's how I've seen it measured at 39 and change, but I don't remember exactly.
I've seen that with the OP 41 and 34, but in that case it was still be measured to the bezel edges (should be the same no matter what as long as 6 hours apart), rather than the case edges.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 12:29 PM   #40
TimeAZ
"TRF" Member
 
TimeAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,240
I'm quite small wristed and still enjoy the DJ41. As aptly illustrated by a helpful poster here, it measures 39.4 mm in diameter. Lug-to-lug is also manageable. Oddly, I find the current generation of 36mm DJ to be too small. Previous 116XXX series had a super case with wider lugs, lending to a larger wearing experience, felt/looked more like a 38.

Anyway, I think if given the option I would pick a 38mm watch over the 39.4mm of the DJ41. To me, 38mm is the perfect size and suitable for nearly all wrist sizes and both genders... it also keeps up with the modern trends including both genders wanting watches of such size.

Personally if the 124270 were released in 38mm I think that could be a contender for a perfect watch. Until then, I think the white OP39 comes closest to perfection, followed closely by the 214270.
TimeAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 01:09 PM   #41
Newmoney
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Space
Posts: 64
No thanks.


I’m sooo glad I have enough when they release the 41 ( dj2 ain’t bad either )


The 36 looks nice and all but that’s a woman’s watch.
Newmoney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 01:48 PM   #42
Playinwittime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SoCal
Watch: out! I'm coming.
Posts: 199
Spot on OP! I couldn’t agree more.
Playinwittime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 01:55 PM   #43
Maxy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: TX
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 3,231
Actually to think, 38mm Datejust is not bad suggestion. Omega used to have 38.2 mm Seamasters and those were perfect everyday watches!
Maxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 02:13 PM   #44
JodyHighroller
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
A 36mm & 38mm could be worn by both men & women. If a 39.4 mm DJ is the perfect size watch then why was the Explorer reduced back to 36mm from 39mm.
I have a feeling a 41mm Exp I is coming to complement the 36.
JodyHighroller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 02:22 PM   #45
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Agree 100%
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 02:32 PM   #46
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rags View Post
I’m sorry but 38mm would still be better and would be a best seller for Rolex.
Umm, the 41mm DJs are sold out every where in every configuration, none on display in any color in the Dallas area, and most colors are allocation only.
Moral of the story, it's already a best seller. 39.5 and 38 is not much different and splitting hairs. There's a choice to be made between a 36 and 39.5, but not much in it between 36 and 38.

Rolex just gave it a name, that's all. Think like car manufacturers and their numbers, no relation to the engine or transmission or anything. The DJ41 is a 39mm watch, round up or down as necessary.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 08:44 PM   #47
robinmgb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
As we all know the DJ41 is 39mm so to me that’s the mans version.
I just think it’s time to call the 36mm the ladies version or at least unisex, certainly not a mans size watch anymore in my opinion
robinmgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 09:19 PM   #48
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by robinmgb View Post
As we all know the DJ41 is 39mm so to me that’s the mans version.
I just think it’s time to call the 36mm the ladies version or at least unisex, certainly not a mans size watch anymore in my opinion

Yes, and you never miss an opportunity to share this detail with us. Thanks again! [where’s the dummy hammer on this o/s?]


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 09:33 PM   #49
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
I've seen that with the OP 41 and 34, but in that case it was still be measured to the bezel edges (should be the same no matter what as long as 6 hours apart), rather than the case edges.
I've measured it both ways and it's the same. For purposes of taking the picture I positioned it so the measurement could be seen while I took the picture.

It's kind of hard to tell due to the perspective but the tips of the caliper are down on the bulge of the sides of the case not on the bezel itself. It's angled slightly downward from top to bottom.
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 09:53 PM   #50
Thuilln
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newmoney View Post
No thanks.


I’m sooo glad I have enough when they release the 41 ( dj2 ain’t bad either )


The 36 looks nice and all but that’s a woman’s watch.


Of course.
__________________
Nick

_________________________________________
14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver
Thuilln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 10:04 PM   #51
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I've measured it both ways and it's the same. For purposes of taking the picture I positioned it so the measurement could be seen while I took the picture.

It's kind of hard to tell due to the perspective but the tips of the caliper are down on the bulge of the sides of the case not on the bezel itself. It's angled slightly downward from top to bottom.
Now that you mention it, yes, I see what you're saying about the point of measurement. Not sure how the case is on the DJ41, but on my Explorer 36 the curvature of the case makes the widest part a bit lower (when looking crystal-to-case-back). However, due to the more tapered lugs on that watch, I believe that the bezel represents the widest part, as it sticks off the sides a bit (and caliper measurements clock that at 36, or just a shade below).

I also wonder if Rolex simply measures from 5:00-11:00 in order to justify the "41" moniker?
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2021, 10:21 PM   #52
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
Now that you mention it, yes, I see what you're saying about the point of measurement. Not sure how the case is on the DJ41, but on my Explorer 36 the curvature of the case makes the widest part a bit lower (when looking crystal-to-case-back). However, due to the more tapered lugs on that watch, I believe that the bezel represents the widest part, as it sticks off the sides a bit (and caliper measurements clock that at 36, or just a shade below).

I also wonder if Rolex simply measures from 5:00-11:00 in order to justify the "41" moniker?
It's purely Rolex games. Before I bought this DJ41 I owned the DJII. That one was 41mm on the money. The watch I'm wearing as I type this is the SD43. Measures 43mm perfectly. The DJ41 and OP41 are just simply misrepresented by Rolex on purpose. As for why, only Rolex knows for sure but we can all guess at some of the reasons.
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 12:47 AM   #53
DJTOSUB
"TRF" Member
 
DJTOSUB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
Problem solved

Great picture.

Does anyone know if the DJ36 is actually 36mm or is it actually less like the DJ41?
DJTOSUB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 12:52 AM   #54
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,398
Nah, 36mm is perfect.

Fight me.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 12:53 AM   #55
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,681
But would it really be a 38mm? Rolex seem to use different measuring equipment. Given that they tend to come out smaller than stated, I suspect the 36mm will be close enough.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 01:06 AM   #56
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeAZ View Post
I'm quite small wristed and still enjoy the DJ41. As aptly illustrated by a helpful poster here, it measures 39.4 mm in diameter. Lug-to-lug is also manageable. Oddly, I find the current generation of 36mm DJ to be too small. Previous 116XXX series had a super case with wider lugs, lending to a larger wearing experience, felt/looked more like a 38.

Anyway, I think if given the option I would pick a 38mm watch over the 39.4mm of the DJ41. To me, 38mm is the perfect size and suitable for nearly all wrist sizes and both genders... it also keeps up with the modern trends including both genders wanting watches of such size.

Personally if the 124270 were released in 38mm I think that could be a contender for a perfect watch. Until then, I think the white OP39 comes closest to perfection, followed closely by the 214270.

100% agree with everything you said, including the previous-gen DJ and the OP39 and 214270. Spot on.
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 01:08 AM   #57
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
I love my 39mm OP and it’s the closest watch to a DJ without the date, If they made it an option to have a fluted bezel & a jubilee bracelet I would be content even though I’d love the date feature but I could do without it.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 01:10 AM   #58
Alcibiades
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 148
DJ 41 with fluted bezel is perfect size - the fluted bezel makes the watch appear a bit bigger than it’s true 39.5 size. 36 is great as a unisex watch. Not sure why a 38mm is needed.
Alcibiades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 01:19 AM   #59
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcibiades View Post
DJ 41 with fluted bezel is perfect size - the fluted bezel makes the watch appear a bit bigger than it’s true 39.5 size. 36 is great as a unisex watch. Not sure why a 38mm is needed.
I’m sorry but in my opinion a DJ at close to 40mm is just too big, to me it just doesn’t look right. I understand that Rolex is keeping up with the times by making their watches larger but if Tudor can make the Style model in 3-4 different sizes then why can’t Rolex make a DJ in 3-4 different sizes.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2021, 01:22 AM   #60
gnuyork
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcibiades View Post
DJ 41 with fluted bezel is perfect size - the fluted bezel makes the watch appear a bit bigger than it’s true 39.5 size. 36 is great as a unisex watch. Not sure why a 38mm is needed.
That's a matter of opinion, right? Surely you know we all don't agree. I personally don't like the fluted bezel on any Datejust - 36 or 41. The fact that it makes it appear larger is worse... in my opinion.
gnuyork is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.