The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 October 2021, 10:13 PM   #31
garyk
2024 Pledge Member
 
garyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,749
I’m definitely in a better place while avoiding all the craziness…
__________________
garyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 12:18 AM   #32
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
Yes.

All of them.

Would I be willing to add more? Yes.

Regardless, I'm good with what I have.

Very hard to imagine not being satisfied with your collection

Clear favorite (for me) is the Explorer 36, but wow, there's something about those vintage 34mm Tudors...
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:44 AM   #33
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
Very hard to imagine not being satisfied with your collection

Clear favorite (for me) is the Explorer 36, but wow, there's something about those vintage 34mm Tudors...
Thank you! The 114270 will always have a place in my heart, as it was my first Rolex and those vintage 34mm watches are very special, too.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:49 AM   #34
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,673
Yes.



This is my journey's end (possibly) for Rolex collecting. I love them all but this is the joint special one which ties for first place. Having got if from my AD in the current ridiculously hyped marketplace I feel like it's a real achievement, but whether that's a false impression or not, it was the one of the pair I wanted the most.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:55 AM   #35
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
No, the one I really want is the next
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:10 AM   #36
DD58
"TRF" Member
 
DD58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 394
5 years I’ve been hunting a 216570 polar. Now the 226570. I think that the next year will be the lucky one. I did get to try one on yesterday and it confirmed it’s awesome!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DD58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:15 AM   #37
JLM3
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
I do I have been very lucky
JLM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:19 AM   #38
Beto737
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 805
Yes and no. I need one more…
Beto737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:20 AM   #39
dnpina
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: texas
Watch: 126610 LV
Posts: 1,529
No. what I want does not exist.
I want a Lapis Lazuli dialed Explorer.

Im just gonna keep my 214270 and be content.


Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
dnpina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:27 AM   #40
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:44 AM   #41
spoilsofwar01
"TRF" Member
 
spoilsofwar01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: "H"
Location: England
Watch: ing Rainclouds
Posts: 1,439
5513

I'm pleased with my 5513, and if it wasn't way out of my reach I'd have a 5517.
__________________
"H"
5513 Submariner 1968
114270 Explorer 2005
Smiths W10 1968
Tissot Seastar 2011
spoilsofwar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 02:45 AM   #42
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny83 View Post



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That thing is really cool, but sooo small
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland

Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you.
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 03:37 AM   #43
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nav01L View Post
That thing is really cool, but sooo small
It reaches from one side to the other...how much bigger than that
does a bridge need to be.

The watch is a perfect size. It's today's temporary giant watch fad that's off. What really baffles me is people turn around and insist the 39mm Explorer was 3mm too big??

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 05:03 AM   #44
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nav01L View Post
That thing is really cool, but sooo small
????

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 10:59 AM   #45
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
????

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
Look, there is a proportion between the size of a watch and the lump of flesh that is one’s back of the hand that I personally find attractive, and then there’s comically huge watches to one side and to the other, there’s watches that make that lump of flesh look unflatteringly big by virtue of being of smaller diameter. Neither of these two alternatives is particularly appealing to my sense of aesthetics.

I am a rather tall guy at 1.90m in height, and I have a solid stature, with wrists and hands to match. So on my wrist, I feel the Daytona with its dainty 38.5mm size, that’s visually reduced even further by its broad bezel and busy dial, looks out of proportion.

Instead of making me look sharp, as a fine timepiece should, it emphasizes the blunt mass of my limbs. It’s like squeezing into a 48 sized jacket when you should wear a 52. All it’ll do is make you look fat, desperate and clearly unfamiliar with any proper tailor. In my view, a watch should underscore the subtle and refined image I feel would match my personality, not make me look like a blunt big bloke so eager to show the world his status symbol that he’ll wear it whether or not it fits him.

So I have steered clear from the Daytona, even when it was offered to me at retail, in favor of larger watches more in tune with my stature.

But of course, everyone is free to do as they please and my view on this has no ambition of being authoritative in any way. Indeed the image I commented on is evidence enough that other folks see no impediment whatsoever in the proportion of a watch to the size of their wrist.
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland

Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you.
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:11 AM   #46
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,061
I keep looking so I’ll say I haven’t. But I regret nothing I have and would buy them all again. I think a DD or a PM Sky Dweller would do it for me, which I could easily get by trading in my current pieces, but not considering that an option at all. Also like the AP ROO in RG, but that’s a financial commitment even I haven’t been able to justify. Yet.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:19 AM   #47
justcruisin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 206
Also lucky here and got the piece I really want. May have helped it wasn’t SS.
justcruisin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:29 AM   #48
mike morris
"TRF" Member
 
mike morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York-Miami
Watch: SUB40-DJ36-YM40
Posts: 1,068
SubC 41 white gold and BLRO with 2 bracelets.
mike morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:40 AM   #49
ThatOtherGuy7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 509
I am lucky to have found an AD that does not like to push people on unwanted products. Was actually chatting with my SA yesterday about something. I asked him whether PM pieces are easier to get vs SS. He thought I asked if buying other watches that I don’t want would get me something I do want faster and he said “we don’t push people to buy things they don’t want.” That alone is one of the biggest reasons why I enjoy doing business with them.

Edit: was able to get what I really wanted for dad. Now I’m hooked on Rolex and looking to round out the collection with a Daytona and the Batman.
ThatOtherGuy7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:41 AM   #50
ThatOtherGuy7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny83 View Post



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bixby!!!
ThatOtherGuy7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 11:53 AM   #51
dannyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnpina View Post
No. what I want does not exist.
I want a Lapis Lazuli dialed Explorer.

Im just gonna keep my 214270 and be content.


Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Well, technically, sort of the same for me: I'm waiting for pretty much that exact watch, but a regular gloss blue dial with the words "Air King" across the dial.
dannyp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 12:31 PM   #52
csaltphoto
"TRF" Member
 
csaltphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
I really like the moonphase sub, although I would want it created in a 5 digit case. Maybe someday.
csaltphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:12 PM   #53
Finslayer83
"TRF" Member
 
Finslayer83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
Yes.

Finslayer83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:17 PM   #54
VogelPhoenix
"TRF" Member
 
VogelPhoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 3,866
no
Attached Images
 
VogelPhoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 01:31 PM   #55
tudk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Australia
Watch: Various Rolex
Posts: 331
I thought I had the watch I want
but
now I want the BLRO on jubilee

tudk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 07:44 PM   #56
Sandpit
"TRF" Member
 
Sandpit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,808
Yes. A watch I waited over a decade to be able to own. It has far surpassed any expectations I had.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sandpit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2021, 10:28 PM   #57
Chiboy
"TRF" Member
 
Chiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 5,572
Yes, I do. But then again from 1985 to 2016, the same could be said (and was said) about my Datejust. I don't think I have that common TRF gene that makes people say, "Just picked [xxxxx] up today. What should I try to get tomorrow?"
Attached Images
 
__________________
Datejust w/black Tapestry dial (1985) / Daytona (2016)
Chiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2021, 12:05 AM   #58
bonheur
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Germany
Watch: Nomos Atlantik
Posts: 13
Now I have all the watches I really want and love. Ask me again in 3 months and I might want an Aqua Terra, which I don't own at the moment.
bonheur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2021, 12:07 AM   #59
Choo Yao Chuen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 518
Unfortunately for me, NO😜
Choo Yao Chuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2021, 12:21 AM   #60
sgarrity
"TRF" Member
 
sgarrity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 258
See my avatar. It came down to the Explorer or a BLNR. I had the chance to get a BLNR at retail….twice! But passed for the Explorer. Did I make the right decision? From an investment perspective, no. But for me personally, absolutely. The Explorer fits my day to day life and fashion aesthetic. And it was purchased as a gift so no matter the watch I’m never selling it anyway.

So yes, I have what I want. Now could I maybe add some gold in the future??? Time will tell….
sgarrity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.