The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 August 2022, 02:45 AM   #1
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizcut1 View Post
I’d like to see someplace other than this Forum discussing this.

I can’t find it. Please post if you have.
I don't think he's posted for a while but SearChart (who works in a Rolex RSC) has confirmed that there is a known problem - particularly with early production having insufficient lubrication on the seconds wheel pivot.

What is concerning is that more recent movements and those early ones that have been "fixed" under warranty or at service have also exhibited the same issue.

This is not just a "forum issue" unfortunately
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 03:15 AM   #2
Kinnakeet
"TRF" Member
 
Kinnakeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Michelle
Location: Canada/Florida
Watch: WG Breguet Typexx
Posts: 2,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
I don't think he's posted for a while but SearChart (who works in a Rolex RSC) has confirmed that there is a known problem - particularly with early production having insufficient lubrication on the seconds wheel pivot.

What is concerning is that more recent movements and those early ones that have been "fixed" under warranty or at service have also exhibited the same issue.

This is not just a "forum issue" unfortunately
Are you for certain he works in a Rolex RSC?
Kinnakeet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 03:21 AM   #3
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
I don't think he's posted for a while but SearChart (who works in a Rolex RSC) has confirmed that there is a known problem - particularly with early production having insufficient lubrication on the seconds wheel pivot.

What is concerning is that more recent movements and those early ones that have been "fixed" under warranty or at service have also exhibited the same issue.

This is not just a "forum issue" unfortunately
So putting the same question to you Scott, are you a buyer if your AD calls with a BLRO or another 32xx movement?

I think it’s a valid question by the OP

I’m honestly a bit skeptical of some of those who say they won’t touch them
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 04:01 AM   #4
Exracer1985
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: California
Posts: 34
After reading these posts about holding you back from purchasing and others regarding time loss, didn’t stop me.
I recently bought an SD 126603 from my AD two weeks ago as my everyday watch.
I’ve been checking the time and it has gained about 10 seconds in 14 days. I’m good with that and I believe within specs. However time will tell.
I’ve sort of retired my 6265 Daytona that I have worn for 46 years everyday except in the shower. Now that one ran fast too but I was never late for an appointment. If my SD can deliver that performance my young wife will be happy.😀
I suggest go for it. You only live once.
Exracer1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 04:21 AM   #5
DJ2020
"TRF" Member
 
DJ2020's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Wayne
Location: NC
Watch: 226570
Posts: 3,484
I think it's a roll if the dice really. If you get a good one, It's good. If not..... well.

My DJ2 was 3235 equipt with nary a problem..... ever. (2017) My two newest Rolex's was in late 2020. Both absolutely refused to keep time.

Needless to say I was disappointed. But understood these things happen. Do I think there a good movement? well they are accurate when running, just not completely dependable at this point across the board.

I have a long time friend who is a Rolex watchmaker. He still tells me they are still trying to sort things out. With many being returned for warranty work. Around 32% of their sales. Some are addressed the first time in, Some can't seemed to be corrected. My local Rolex AD watchmaker says the same.

Now they are replacing anything they "think" may be related and reporting back to the factory along with the used parts for analysis.

He did say Rolex wants to make it right and are very much involved. So I'm sure things will sort out in the long run.

Will this stop me from buying another? Doubt it. There is one I'm still wanting to get. And most likely will buy it when the time comes (after retirement). Until then I'm enjoying other brands.
__________________
In the end, it's not the years in your life that count.
It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln
__________________________________________________
Rolex 226570, Explorer II Club
DJ2020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 August 2022, 01:35 AM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
So putting the same question to you Scott, are you a buyer if your AD calls with a BLRO or another 32xx movement?

I think it’s a valid question by the OP

I’m honestly a bit skeptical of some of those who say they won’t touch them
Have to agree Brian.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:08 PM   #7
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
There would seem to be millions of these examples if essentially every non-Daytona last 5 years is afflicted
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:09 PM   #8
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
I decided to get the new Sub Date tomorrow
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 04:46 AM   #9
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
I think the 32xxs are damn duds ,but own the following:

124060
126610LN
126610LV
126710BLNR
126619LB
126719 Meteorite

Go figure ! ...
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 04:58 AM   #10
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni View Post
I think the 32xxs are damn duds ,but own the following:

124060
126610LN
126610LV
126710BLNR
126619LB
126719 Meteorite

Go figure ! ...
Since you are calling them duds, can you advise which of your six pieces have had any issues?
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 05:02 AM   #11
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni View Post
I think the 32xxs are damn duds ,but own the following:

124060
126610LN
126610LV
126710BLNR
126619LB
126719 Meteorite

Go figure ! ...
Makes complete sense
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:39 PM   #12
Bizcut1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bizcut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,253
Thanks
Bizcut1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:43 PM   #13
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
No hesitation at all. Have owned two with no problems and a plan is in place for another. If a problem manifests the AD will deal with it. While some issues have been clearly documented the odds are by far in my favor.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 01:54 PM   #14
kyleg531
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Looking for a 32 series Sub as we speak. FWIW, had a 31 series sub that stopped running after 2 months of ownership (purchased new). Second hand “caught” on the 5 second mark. Have also had Omega PO with consistent issues.

Own enough watches and you run into things. Seems like the 32 series has its share of issues, but imagine Rolex has/will address. Nothing is bullet proof at high enough production scale.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kyleg531 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 02:33 PM   #15
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
Well this is interesting. My dealer generously loaned me a new Sub to try out on rubber this weekend while I decided if I wanted to buy one NIB. This “loaner” has already lost 5 seconds from 24 hours ago.
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 02:36 PM   #16
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
Well this is interesting. My dealer generously loaned me a new Sub to try out on rubber this weekend while I decided if I wanted to buy one NIB. This “loaner” has already lost 5 seconds from 24 hours ago.
yikes.... you don't happen to have access to a timegrapher do ya? What year is the BNIB sub?
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 02:41 PM   #17
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by amanbra View Post
yikes.... you don't happen to have access to a timegrapher do ya? What year is the BNIB sub?
I don’t know what year this one is, but he sized it and let me wear it for the weekend. I actually only wore it for an hour and put it away once I was certain I wanted one. However after I read all of this horror last night I gave it a full wind and laid it down to test performance. This -5 overnight is not good. I thought all the 32 canaries said it took 18 months to show up?! Mine is NIB at shop and I think 2022 but need to confirm tomorrow.
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 02:41 PM   #18
subprimero
"TRF" Member
 
subprimero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,434
The only current Rolex model I have any interest in is the Sky-Dweller. Rolex references with the 32xx movements are a no-go for me.
subprimero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 02:44 PM   #19
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
I guess this means all DD40s are afflicted? Wow
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:02 PM   #20
Bizcut1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bizcut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,253
I think you should turn the new Sub down. It will only take them about five minutes to sell it to someone else so no harm done and that someone will be very happy.

Make sure to explain to them why you don’t want it.

That should go well. I’m sure they will be happy to get you another.
Bizcut1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:14 PM   #21
CHRONOLEX
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizcut1 View Post
I think you should turn the new Sub down. It will only take them about five minutes to sell it to someone else so no harm done and that someone will be very happy.

Make sure to explain to them why you don’t want it.

That should go well. I’m sure they will be happy to get you another.
You think I should turn down the new one and find a 3135 Sub? Really want to have one to wear on rubber.
CHRONOLEX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:51 PM   #22
amanbra
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Graham
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
You think I should turn down the new one and find a 3135 Sub? Really want to have one to wear on rubber.
This is what I would do if I were in the market for sub. I'd even considering going five digit as I prefer the case shape on them vs the fat lugs.
amanbra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 05:46 PM   #23
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
You think I should turn down the new one and find a 3135 Sub? Really want to have one to wear on rubber.
You should buy the one you like regardless of the movement.
It’s only a watch and if it start loosing some time what does it matter.
About once a week I set mine ahead a good 5 minutes and half way the week I am spot on.

Personally I opt for the previous version 116610. I prefer the blockier case which many seem to dislike and the more reliable engine is a nice plus.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 10:57 PM   #24
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by joli160 View Post
You should buy the one you like regardless of the movement.
It’s only a watch and if it start loosing some time what does it matter.
About once a week I set mine ahead a good 5 minutes and half way the week I am spot on.

Personally I opt for the previous version 116610. I prefer the blockier case which many seem to dislike and the more reliable engine is a nice plus.
Real world user common sense.

I’ve never missed an appointment, a flight, a train and the list goes on. That’s using 32xx movements from Rolex with the oldest reference being a 2017
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 02:39 AM   #25
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
Real world user common sense.

I’ve never missed an appointment, a flight, a train and the list goes on. That’s using 32xx movements from Rolex with the oldest reference being a 2017
Afraid common sense is sadly lacking today Brian, wonder how many 32 series movements today are in the world today.The majority of them loved by there owners ,mainly because without the aid of timegraphers and the rest of today's Rolex toys.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 02:18 AM   #26
Bizcut1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bizcut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
You think I should turn down the new one and find a 3135 Sub? Really want to have one to wear on rubber.
Dude, sorry. I was being sarcastic.

Go get your sub.

Don’t tell them a small group of posters on an Internet watch forum dissuaded you.

Enjoy your watch!

Ben
Bizcut1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:27 PM   #27
Doood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,027
I would really like an SD43. Or even a TT SD43. Or maybe both….can’t make up my mind. But even if this issue affects only a small percentage, I am just not ready to roll the dice. Sigh….

Always loved the polar exp 2. Went out of my way to pick up a 216570 in 2020 before the new movement was introduced. I have the best AD, by the way, who made this happen, and I was very open with him about my strategy (or paranoia).

I just don’t want to spend energy going through the warranty process. Could I have issues with one of my 31xx series movements? Of course, but really want to manage my risk.

I also believe most 32xx owners wouldn’t notice a slowing movement, so my guess is the problem is more widespread than being reported. I am very disappointed by the way Rolex has been managing this issue.
Doood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 03:32 PM   #28
saxo3
"TRF" Member
 
saxo3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
Question: is this 32xx issue preventing or causing anyone to hold off from buying new watches right now?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRONOLEX View Post
If so, how do we know when problem has been resolved and it’s safe to buy again?
No chance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doood View Post
I also believe most 32xx owners wouldn’t notice a slowing movement, so my guess is the problem is more widespread than being reported.
Yes, very likely, but impossible to verify.
saxo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2022, 08:08 PM   #29
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doood View Post
I just don’t want to spend energy going through the warranty process.
That would be a pain but at least it offers protection. My worry is what happens if the watch starts to fail at six years old? That's not a warranty fix. When it comes back from the RSC with a two year warranty, what happens if it develops more issues two and a half years later? I don't want a watch that needs servicing every 2-3 years. Then again, it could run for 20 years. We just don't know, but the 32 based movement appears to be gaining a poor reputation.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 August 2022, 03:58 PM   #30
Doood
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Socal
Posts: 1,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry-57 View Post
That would be a pain but at least it offers protection. My worry is what happens if the watch starts to fail at six years old? That's not a warranty fix. When it comes back from the RSC with a two year warranty, what happens if it develops more issues two and a half years later? I don't want a watch that needs servicing every 2-3 years. Then again, it could run for 20 years. We just don't know, but the 32 based movement appears to be gaining a poor reputation.
Yes, this exactly. I keep hearing, “I have five years.” Well, if you bought an SD43 in 2017, times up, and not convinced the fix is in yet.
Doood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.