Why not Glidelock on every model?

[alphadweller]

I almost never use the glidelock. I actually find the easylink more practical, you don't even need to take the watch off to pull the extension.

My problem with the glidelock is the massive clasp that comes with it, compared to the smaller one with the easylink.

For what I personally need, the glidelock is overkill. I hope Rolex dont start offering it with all their sports watches.

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by tjs1295

I don’t own a GMT, but I thought there were some micro adjustments that are less than 5 mm? I thought I read somewhere that they are kind of hidden? Either way, I don’t use my glidelock very often. I actually prefer the micro adjustment on the omega divers. I like that it snaps into place when moving rather than the sliding of the glidelock. I’ve tried to snap it closed multiple times when it’s between notches.

You’re correct, there are three divots points inside the clasp to fine tune the fit, but they are awkward to use on a regular basis.

As long as your wrist doesn’t swell much, this is a fine way to get the right fit

[fskywalker]

Guess is because Rolex market that feature for water sport models only. Think the only other model has it is the YM (smaller version, below) which is also marketed for water (sailing) as well






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by alphadweller

I almost never use the glidelock. I actually find the easylink more practical, you don't even need to take the watch off to pull the extension.

My problem with the glidelock is the massive clasp that comes with it, compared to the smaller one with the easylink.

For what I personally need, the glidelock is overkill. I hope Rolex dont start offering it with all their sports watches.

Mini glidelock would solve that IMO.

I feel that the standard glidelock found on the submariner and SeaDwellers is fairly proportionate to the rest of the watch in those cases.

If they used the mini glidelock for Explorers, GMTs etc., as found on the YM oystereflex bracelet, I think it’d be perfect.

I’m going to reach out to a member here to see if he’s ever done it

[Cru Jones]

Glidelock is nice for the 2 or 3 times I adjust it during the year. Better than the 5 series toothpick technique.

As for why it's only on divers, I guess it's the same thing as with the type of crown: differentiation.

[BroncoOne]

Originally Posted by Nairn1980

I do tend to agree.

They could quite easily incorporate glidelock style clasps into most sizes of watches.

I suppose it is to differentiate between the models.

It is. The sub is a dive watch and the glidelock is to accommodate a diver wearing the watch over the sleeve of a dive suit so he or she can read it to time oxygen use and a timed resurfacing.

GMTs aren’t a “sports” watch. They are for pilots, travelers and people who do business across different time zones. No one is wearing a GMT over the sleeve of a suit ( I hope!).

That said, I agree with the OP that a glidelock is a superior feature and I would definitely appreciate some approximation of it on every watch

[brandrea]

Originally Posted by fskywalker

Guess is because Rolex market that feature for water sport models only. Think the only other model has it is the YM (smaller version, below) which is also marketed for water (sailing) as well






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Thank you, that’s the one and far smaller than the glidelock on a Sub

[Newt]

I'm a huge fan. I've purchased two 97200 bracelets for two of my 5-digit watches. I don't much care about the size of the clasp. they are fantastic. I live in vermont and north carolina. As you can imagine, the temperature differences are large. I use my glidelocks and easylinks all the time.

[fsprow]

For me it’s too long and ugly. I sold both watches with Glidelock. I just set a watch a bit loose in the winter and never touch again. Differs by person I guess.

[258Pearl]

Perhaps I'm unique too, but I'm with OP 100%. I live in Florida where we swap from A/C to 90+ degree weather in the summer and Heat to 50 degree weather in the winter. My wrists expand and contract a lot and I find myself only wearing my Sub and 300M since they both have glide lock adjustments. My other watches have the 3 pin adjuster, but it's just not as easy.

I had one butterfly bracelet watch, and will never have another since the only way to adjust is by adding/removing a link. No bueno.

[tifosi]

I never use the 2mm adjustment functionality of the Glidelock. I am very much a "set it and forget" it wearer. I get it where I want it (if I'm in between links I always set it on the tighter of the two) and forget about it. I hate my watch flopping around so I always lean towards a tighter fit.

I can't be bothered with adjusting it multiple times a day depending on what my wrist is doing. I only use the Glidelock when I put the watch over a wetsuit.

[watchwatcher]

This is one time I'm going to tell you you're absolutely right, my friend.

Actually, I think the mini-glide lock that's on the OF line (sans Daytona, ofc) would be just the ticket.

Also- a little curious about the half-link comment. So there is a half-link option for the GMT? Both jubilee and oyster? Interesting...

[WatchGuy1966]

Originally Posted by Lunaen

Agreed, they have a mini glidelock already on the oyster flex yacht master and sky dwellers. No reason they can’t put a small glidelock on every sport model.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see this in my crystal ball for the future bracelet development

[Xerxes300]

Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy

I have had my GMT for a couple days, honestly, I like it much more then I thought I ever would. I adored my 126610 sub, but my 126710 just seems to have a bit… More. I will do a comparison after wearing this one for a month, the pros and cons of the Sub and the GMT but I can tell you right off the bat one thing I REALLY miss is the Glidelock function of the Sub.

Maybe I am weird (well, I AM, but that’s a story for another thread) but I was subconsciously adjusting my Glidelock. I guess I have sensitive wrists… Anyway, it is a big adjustment trying to get used to the +- 5 MM only adjustment on my GMT clasp. I can just not seem to get it right I have ordered a half-link from Rolex, hopefully that will give me the Goldi-lox fit, but there is just nothing compared to the very convenient 2mm adjustments of the Glidelock on the Sub. So, my question is…

Why can’t Rolex include this feature on all models?

Or do I just have weird wrists that expand and contract more then normal?

i used to fidget with my glidelock like you for like 3 months, i finally stopped and just kept it at one point where it was a little loose in the morning and a bit snug at night.

[yesnaya]

You could do what I did. Find a 97200 bracelet and put it on your GMT. You get that touch of color from the GMT, and the glidelock from the sub. No polished center links though.

[yesnaya]

Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy

Posted in the “Wanted to buy” section. From what I know (and someone feel free to correct me) the 116610 clasp WILL fit my 126710 GMT. THAT, would make for an awesome fit bracelet!

The Clasp on the 116610 is satin finished.... you would have to polish it to look right. Plus I have not seen the clasp sold individually either; I have always seen the glidelock clasp attached to the 97200 bracelet (that comes on the 116610 sub). I purchased a brand new 97200 bracelet (it comes with the glidelock clasp) from a grey dealer and never looked back.

[TheVTCGuy]

Originally Posted by watchwatcher

This is one time I'm going to tell you you're absolutely right, my friend.

Actually, I think the mini-glide lock that's on the OF line (sans Daytona, ofc) would be just the ticket.

Also- a little curious about the half-link comment. So there is a half-link option for the GMT? Both jubilee and oyster? Interesting...

Yes, I just ordered it from my AD. The part number is down below in the picture. PLEASE, check with your AD before ordering, it was only $50, but I would hate for you to spend money on something that would not work with your watch. When I get mine, i will post how everything worked out.

[culvercity]

I like the ez link because the bracelet is not as thick. With the glidelock it will make the bracelet latch part a lot thicker and I don't want that.

[173rdabn]

Only the Shadow (30s/40s radio show) and Rolex Know.

[FrankNYC]

I'm frequently adjusting steel bracelets, so glidelock is must for me. I passed on a GMT Bec of the lack of a glidelock.

[Gaff65]

I'm hoping if and when my call comes for a BLNR it will have been updated to include glidelock. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

[Gab27]

Glidelock for me has been a blessing. I'm in a climate that gets hot and sticky in the summer and when I am doing stuff outside my wrist swells.

If I ever got a GMT, the first thing I would do is track down a bracelet with a Glidelock clasp for it. They could at least offer a brushed bracelet with a Glidelock clasp as an upgraded option for it!!!

[HogwldFLTR]

Real men don't use Glidelocks!!!

[Watchsprings]

I am with OP, I love the glidelock. I have a 116610 Sub and and a BLRO. I want to do the swap for my BLRO. It I need to find a good bracelet replacement for my Sub.

[Geckobros]

Why make them all nice?

[Rolex.Journey]

Glidelock for all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2loaded]

Agreed! Spoiled with the glidelocks on the Sub and DSSD. I too struggled with the Oyster on my GMTs. I would add a link, move in the clasp adj. A few weeks later, I'd drop a link and move the clasp adj out.. I'm now at a spot where it fits perfect, however the 5mm adj is always out. AD recommended a 1/2 link. Look like I'll be going that route as well.

[Glidelock]

Clearly…I’m partial to Glidelock!

[Number3]

Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy

Posted in the “Wanted to buy” section. From what I know (and someone feel free to correct me) the 116610 clasp WILL fit my 126710 GMT. THAT, would make for an awesome fit bracelet!

Would love to know if this does fit.

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy

Yes, I just ordered it from my AD. The part number is down below in the picture. PLEASE, check with your AD before ordering, it was only $50, but I would hate for you to spend money on something that would not work with your watch. When I get mine, i will post how everything worked out.

Awesome. Thanks for the information!

That is the oyster version, correct?