|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
18 September 2009, 05:53 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Watch: See my signature
Posts: 1,189
|
I'd drop a hundred bucks on it.
__________________
"Woody and Jen say hey from North Kakalaki"  19019, 19018x3, 17000x2, 16570x2, 16220, 5700, 1501, 6564, 16030, 16710, 16610 
|
|
|
|
18 September 2009, 06:12 AM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: fort wayne IN
Watch: Patek 1909003
Posts: 2,176
|
That's pretty bad and i don't even know that much about fakes.
|
|
|
|
|
18 September 2009, 06:22 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Steven
Location: Sweden
Watch: Old English Fusee
Posts: 246
|
I think the numbers are to close together. On a genuine Rolex the numbers are wider apart.
This is what I usually look for (among other things). I learned this trick a while back at this site: http://www.qualitytyme.net/pages/rolex_or_replica.html |
|
|
|
|
18 September 2009, 06:44 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
I was just about to say that the lum on the rotating bezel was a bit big..then I saw the polfy...
had a good laugh...
__________________
too much into watches... |
|
|
|
|
18 September 2009, 06:49 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
|
Put that fugazi in the CAN man!
FAKES
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
