ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 June 2010, 09:34 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I'd imagine that it's something to do with this :
__________________
..33 |
21 June 2010, 09:39 AM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: fernando
Location: barcelona
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 285
|
|
21 June 2010, 09:44 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
..... and don't get me wrong.
I bought this piece a couple of days ago for far less than half the price I'd get for my BLV if I sold it tomorrow and the watch is a "superior" in more than one way. It was also probably cheaper than the price one would get for an ETA IWC watch and it would be hard to raise a giggle when asserting that the Zenith was a finer example of a timepiece. The market placed the value of this superb watch at a fraction of an equivalent Daytona and all that one can do is respect the reality of such a market and simply acquire the better value pieces.
__________________
..33 |
21 June 2010, 09:54 AM | #64 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: Tiffany blue Sub
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
They kept one person busy repairing the Link bracelets full time . . . |
|
21 June 2010, 10:49 AM | #65 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 117
|
|
21 June 2010, 11:31 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
|
tag reminds me of the sports adage: looks like tarzan, but plays like jane.
|
21 June 2010, 11:47 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: 3026'23N 8638'41W
Watch: out for pirates!
Posts: 692
|
I own a Tag and like it just fine... its no Rolex, but hey.... I wear it.
__________________
~Nick Riebe~ |
21 June 2010, 11:47 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
Well, I really like Tag, however its not a Rolex. I have a Tag 6000, but it doesn't compare to my Sub
|
21 June 2010, 11:50 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Kaya
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,575
|
Quote:
I agree and my ladies Tag Link is not as durable a watch as my Rolex, plus I have to buy batteries. I love my Rolex, I only like my Tag.
__________________
GMT II BLNR, Submariner, Submariner Serti, Datejust, Daytona C, TT Yacht Master, Hulk Submariner, Pepsi GMT II |
|
21 June 2010, 11:55 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
|
21 June 2010, 11:57 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Singapore
Watch: APRolexPAMTudor
Posts: 57
|
I have rolex watches and my daily beater is a Tag F1 chrono. Nowhere is the tag comparable to a rolex even though the Tag is a tough watch. Have been wearing it since 2004 and it is a good sports watch. I just find it strange that a Tag is being compraed to a rolex.
|
21 June 2010, 11:58 AM | #72 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Dante
Location: New York City
Watch: Rolex What Else?
Posts: 82
|
A Tag is a Poor Man's Rolex!!! .......Anyone else agree??
|
21 June 2010, 12:05 PM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Kaya
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,575
|
Quote:
The price difference was only about $1500 between the Tag I bought and an entry level Rolex. Of course, once I added the special dial, diamonds on the dial and gold bezel to the Rolex, there was a $6000 price difference..
__________________
GMT II BLNR, Submariner, Submariner Serti, Datejust, Daytona C, TT Yacht Master, Hulk Submariner, Pepsi GMT II |
|
21 June 2010, 12:24 PM | #74 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
Quote:
Yes they are worse quality, but what you just said is a very ignorant statement and another one of the reasons why on other forums I've run into large prejudices against Rolex owners. Is a Rolex a poor mans Lange? |
|
21 June 2010, 12:27 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jim
Location: DFW, TX
Watch: Yachtmaster II YG
Posts: 276
|
or a poor mans patek?
|
21 June 2010, 12:31 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
i think she was just having some fun at your expense!!!
|
21 June 2010, 12:35 PM | #77 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: damon
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16610
Posts: 95
|
i dun really compare what is better...seems rather impossible to define 'better'..so i just buy what i like...n wear what i like...tat makes me a happier person...hahaha...cheers
|
21 June 2010, 12:37 PM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
Like both TAG and Rolex, for me TAG quality may be lesser... but it doesn't make TAG a bad watch ! the resale value is the one thing that TAG lacks.... other than that, they produce beautiful watches. I had mine for 5 years, and no complaint at all.
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
21 June 2010, 12:46 PM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
i have an 80s quartz TAG that look very much a like the dial of a sub but blue with a blue bezel and jubilee bracelet. still works! got it as a gift for high school. but now i "graduated" from wearing a TAG
|
21 June 2010, 01:20 PM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I find many of Tag's designs to be trendy looking. There are a few exceptions, the Monaco being one of them.
Rolex on the other hand, I can't think of one that I would put into the trendy design category...classic designs(perhaps even too conservative for some) that will stand the test of time IMO. |
21 June 2010, 01:36 PM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: GMT Master IIc SS
Posts: 318
|
i enjoy both, but i wear my rolex a lot more
|
21 June 2010, 01:39 PM | #82 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: fernando
Location: barcelona
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 285
|
I think that if I am going to expend 4000 euros in a watch, I will buy a rolex SS, not a tag or any watch with standard machine, I want a home-made machine for that money
but if I am going expend 1500 euros on a nice watch, I can buy many watches for that price, I will buy fortis, tudor, tag, corum...very well made watches at good prices, but for me is not logical buy a watch with an standard movement at the price of one manufactured |
21 June 2010, 01:51 PM | #83 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
Quote:
|
|
21 June 2010, 01:54 PM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
That would also draw a good comparison, Lange came to my head immediately though, because I've recently been trying a few on at my AD, and they are STUNNING. (Albeit priced at $60,000+)
Think I should sell part of my collection to help fund one? |
21 June 2010, 01:55 PM | #85 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: fernando
Location: barcelona
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 285
|
|
21 June 2010, 01:58 PM | #86 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: fernando
Location: barcelona
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 285
|
|
21 June 2010, 02:02 PM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
|
Wow. I have purchased my wife two tags, one dating back to the 80s, and they have been faultless, loyal servants with great looks. In fact, she prefers the look to anything else I've shown her, and hs enjoyed her tags.
To read a Rolex forum bashing another brand reeks of insecurity. If you bought a Rolex, and you love it, then it IS the best watch for you. But if you think Rolex is the top of the food chain in movement 'manufacture" then you are fooling yourself. This isn't a game of "who's better" it's a game of "what do I enjoy wearing?" When I'm running I like my Garmin heart monitor, GPS, the best. Seiko is making some of the best lume on the planet, perhaps as good as Girard Perregaux, although you wouldn't find advocates of one brand likely wearing the other (I do, but I'm lume driven). I think it degrades Rolex ownership to feel the need to call it "better" than any other brand. |
21 June 2010, 02:07 PM | #88 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: fernando
Location: barcelona
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 285
|
Quote:
|
|
21 June 2010, 08:52 PM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 248
|
|
21 June 2010, 09:25 PM | #90 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
|
What is the point or need to say X brand is better than Y or Z brand?? These threads sound "insecure and needy" like a high school pissing match. Just an observation.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.