The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 July 2010, 12:58 PM   #61
16610v
"TRF" Member
 
16610v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: YL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 701
although the ceramic is very scratch-resistant but it does not cover the platimum numbers. Meaning that the numbers still very easy been scratched.
Anyway, wear with health!
__________________
Instagram: litwing23
16610v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 01:02 PM   #62
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
I'm sorry to hear it, I hope they pick up the tab for you.

This whole ceramic vs aluminum debate makes me wonder if there was a similar debate when watchmakers switched from acrylic to sapphire. Just like the ceramic dial, sapphire is much more scratch resistant, but will explode if hit just right....
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 01:03 PM   #63
t e x
"TRF" Member
 
t e x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Joel
Location: Renton, WA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 2,990
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2th DR View Post
Back in the day, I had a few Rados. I actually took one of the extra links I wasn't using and put it to the test. I hit it with a hammer. I torched it with a high temp torch we use in dentistry to melt gold. I took a diamond dental handpiece bur to it. Nothing happened to it. Consider though, the Rado link is much thicker than the Rolex ceramic insert, and with bulk comes strength.
The torture test....pretty cool.

Sorry to hear thw news Vince.
__________________
___/ /_/ /_____ 16610LV; Ball Diver EMT II
\:::::::::::::::/
~~~~~~~~~~
t e x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 01:59 PM   #64
Green Arrow
"TRF" Member
 
Green Arrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
Would you mind posting photos of the broken bezel insert?

And the bezel itself?
Green Arrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 03:29 PM   #65
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Brian View Post
God, don't tell JJ! He'll have a stroke!
Rado > Rolex?
The nurse is just giving me mouth to mouth!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 10:36 PM   #66
rolexdeepsea
"TRF" Member
 
rolexdeepsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: england
Posts: 251
Can someone tell me if the ceramic is place on top of a steel bezel or it made of all ceramic and the steel is placed on the edge of the the cermaic.

If ceramic placed in the steelbezal the surly the bezal is stronger then just ceramic...point is it shouldn't break the easy right!
rolexdeepsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:21 PM   #67
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
I would LOVE to se Pics!!!
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2010, 11:43 PM   #68
mcubed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
Not sure this really is a huge issue, I doubt that the ceramic is more likely than sapphire to break when hit, and we all accept that risk just fine.


Also, from what I understand, the ceramic insert is not THAT expensive, the quotes of thousands for a new one include a new bezel (often on TT models) because the watch got dropped and the bezel got bent. The insert alone, I don't believe is that expensive.
__________________
The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist
2002 Rolex Submariner 14060
1963 Omega Automatic LL6304
1953 Wittnauer Revue
2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500
mcubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 12:33 AM   #69
Casey VP-26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 2,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcubed View Post
Not sure this really is a huge issue, I doubt that the ceramic is more likely than sapphire to break when hit, and we all accept that risk just fine.


Also, from what I understand, the ceramic insert is not THAT expensive, the quotes of thousands for a new one include a new bezel (often on TT models) because the watch got dropped and the bezel got bent. The insert alone, I don't believe is that expensive.
I Don't believe ceramic to sapphire is a fair comparison , I dont remember hearing of any shattered sapphire crystal unless it was driven over by a vehicle. As far as cost is for the ceramic insert , the discussions on this forum have been the cost of bezel alone replaced was around $500.00. I know to alot of folks thats not a lot of money, but to myself, THATS A LOT OF MONEY. Hopefully these reports of Chipped and Shattered bezel's will not become a major problem.
Casey VP-26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 12:35 AM   #70
Hooper
"TRF" Member
 
Hooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
Sorry Bro !! That would make me sick !! I feel for yeah, unfortunately you will probably be on the hook for payment. I think this is going to be a regular occurrence foe ALL ceramic bezels im afraid !
Hooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 12:37 AM   #71
The Waddler
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: Back in London
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The nurse is just giving me mouth to mouth!!
Stop showing off !!!!
The Waddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 12:43 AM   #72
DRAWTOOL
"TRF" Member
 
DRAWTOOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The nurse is just giving me mouth to mouth!!
It's too easy...
__________________
Dances with Dogs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
And you call that a nightmare, ya tosser?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
You just made it into the Tosser Hall of Fame, ya bastid tosser!!
Inducted 3/25/10
DRAWTOOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 12:54 AM   #73
Bullyterrier
"TRF" Member
 
Bullyterrier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
That is bad news, I would be gutted as well.

However I am really surprised that so many here are shocked, it has been said before about the ceramic inserts being scratch resistant but brittle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vince211 View Post

Am I wrong here - what do you guys think??? p.
Would you take a car back to the dealers if a stone flew up and chipped or cracked your windshield and expected them to sort it free of charge?
__________________
So Mote it be.

Last edited by Bullyterrier; 29 July 2010 at 01:07 AM.. Reason: added "and expected them to sort it free of charge"
Bullyterrier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 01:04 AM   #74
mcubed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey VP-26 View Post
I Don't believe ceramic to sapphire is a fair comparison , I dont remember hearing of any shattered sapphire crystal unless it was driven over by a vehicle. As far as cost is for the ceramic insert , the discussions on this forum have been the cost of bezel alone replaced was around $500.00. I know to alot of folks thats not a lot of money, but to myself, THATS A LOT OF MONEY. Hopefully these reports of Chipped and Shattered bezel's will not become a major problem.
Plenty of sapphire crystals get shattered after low height drops or falls, so it's more common than you might think. As far as cost, yes if the ceramic insert alone costs 500, then that is a lot of money, but I have heard it is closer to 250 or so. Still a lot, but not the same as some of the higher estimates
__________________
The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist
2002 Rolex Submariner 14060
1963 Omega Automatic LL6304
1953 Wittnauer Revue
2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500
mcubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 01:10 AM   #75
Mikefxd
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Vancouver BC
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 147
Cost of being first. Anytime a manufacture changes a product there are usually issues. Cars being the biggest offender. It nice to have the newest model but you may paid the price of being a beta tester.

If Rolex see's this happening a lot they will have to change something or word if get out and sales in those models will drop.
Mikefxd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 July 2010, 06:05 AM   #76
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Good luck with the repair.
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 08:41 AM   #77
vince211
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by DS_Obsessed View Post
Do car manufacturers warranty vehicles when you get into an everyday accidents. Under normal circumstances, no. Bumpers crack when hit just right, with just the perfect amount of pressure.

Sorry to hear about the gmt. Bad luck. Maybe rolex will come through. Keep us updated.

Just a question, if you know you can recoup decent money selling a gmtc with a cracked bezel, why so quick to give up on it. Consider getting it fixed and call it bad luck. S&$t happens.

Good points! I guess deep down, I really don't want to get rid of it. I thought if a preloved one in good condition was fetching only $5000, that I would only get $3500 or so for mine with a broken bezel. Also, I am hoping for a repair under warranty at no cost even if the chances are slim.
vince211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 08:42 AM   #78
vince211
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSts View Post
I'd be sad too!

Can you recall if you accidentally hit the watch face, or side, against something hard or is this a case of a 'suddenly shattering ceramic' event?

I hit it at an angle, but can't really recall if it hit the watch face or from the side. The contact was with a pole.
vince211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 08:46 AM   #79
vince211
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Very sorry to hear about your mishap, Vince. I'm actually quite surprised that the bezel should shatter so easily.

I wish you had a picture for us to have an idea of the extent of the damage.

Anyway, good luck with having it replaced asap.

Cheers - JJ


JJ, Et. al; you guys are right - I should've snapped a pic. The whole point of TRF is to share knowledge and I now realize I missed a chance to do just that by not taking a picture.

I contacted the AD just now, but they've already sent the watch off. I do apologize. The best way to describe it is the bezel cracked and snapped as my wrist hit a pole when I was walking in my warehouse. The contact was not harsh at all, but obviously at the right angle and pressure.

So there is nothing actually missing from the bezel but it popped off. If you hold the bezel and flex it in opposite directions it comes apart at the "10." However, if the bezel is sitting concave on my desk and there is no pressure then the bezel comes together absolutely perfectly at the "10." Visually until you touch the bezel it looks perfect.

There are no chips, no scuff marks, no pieces missing, etc. It literally snapped and I could feel it "spring" off my wrist.

Again, I do apologize for not taking pics. It is flat out a mistake that I didn't do it - no excuses. Sorry TRF.
vince211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 09:03 AM   #80
TSts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by vince211 View Post
JJ, Et. al; you guys are right - I should've snapped a pic. The whole point of TRF is to share knowledge and I now realize I missed a chance to do just that by not taking a picture.

I contacted the AD just now, but they've already sent the watch off. I do apologize. The best way to describe it is the bezel cracked and snapped as my wrist hit a pole when I was walking in my warehouse. The contact was not harsh at all, but obviously at the right angle and pressure.

So there is nothing actually missing from the bezel but it popped off. If you hold the bezel and flex it in opposite directions it comes apart at the "10." However, if the bezel is sitting concave on my desk and there is no pressure then the bezel comes together absolutely perfectly at the "10." Visually until you touch the bezel it looks perfect.

There are no chips, no scuff marks, no pieces missing, etc. It literally snapped and I could feel it "spring" off my wrist.

Again, I do apologize for not taking pics. It is flat out a mistake that I didn't do it - no excuses. Sorry TRF.
Damn poles just jump right out and get in the way - especially if you're wearing a fine timepiece! Bad luck, sorry.
__________________

116710LN
116300blro
TSts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 09:09 AM   #81
jrssv
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
That's a good reason why not to buy the new Sub.
jrssv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 09:45 AM   #82
Sose
"TRF" Member
 
Sose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOVA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexdeepsea View Post
You might can claim with your insurance company if you have it insured.

Do you have it insured?
Sose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 01:02 PM   #83
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by swatty View Post
Curious, the ceramic shattered and you didn't strike it against anything ?
On the other I can't believe the brittle bezel shattered with such a light tap (I was in a warehouse and hit my wrist on a pole at apparently Just the right angle and pressure).

__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 01:15 PM   #84
cajunron
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
cajunron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
I'm sorry about your watch and hope you have a favorable out come. But if it were me, and I had hit my watch against a (steel?) pole in a warehouse, and the bezel cracked, I wouldn't exactly expect Rolex to fix it under warranty any more than if I had dropped it on a tile floor and shattered the crystal. I'm sorry if our opinions differ, just my. Good luck!
cajunron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 July 2010, 01:43 PM   #85
newmedia
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
I own TT GMT2C "Z" serial, I have hit walls, doors, falling down 12 steps of stairs in Mexico while being drunk, it has scratches all over the watch inc on the crystal.
So far the bezel looks great. any thing can be broken if hit on the right spot so far I have not done it yet, on the other hand just pick up "V" serial sub date , I been told this is last model serial for Sub Date., very light compare to newer models.
newmedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2010, 06:00 AM   #86
vince211
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgdejong View Post
I'm sorry about your watch and hope you have a favorable out come. But if it were me, and I had hit my watch against a (steel?) pole in a warehouse, and the bezel cracked, I wouldn't exactly expect Rolex to fix it under warranty any more than if I had dropped it on a tile floor and shattered the crystal. I'm sorry if our opinions differ, just my. Good luck!

No insurance on my watch - will look into it now!


Hi ronnie, thanks for the post. I certainly understand your opinion. Please allow me to retort. I'll take the car analogy from one of the earlier posts - if you buy a car and crack the bumper because you hit something would you expect the manufacturer to fix it free? No I would not.

However, my opinion is that this situation is more like me buying a Range Rover after testing it at the Dealership on their obstacle course. Kind of like buying a tool watch that I am told is robust and to quote the AD when I bought it "I could go diving with it and when I come out of the water just throw the watch on the floor of the boat while I get my wetsuit off." I'm told this Range Rover can literally travel across the Sahara and survive. It can travel up and down mountains in rough terrain, etc, etc eventhough I will never take it offroad. So I take the Range Rover home and after less than a year of ownership and zero abuse to the car I bump into my own garage door at 2 mph in the driveway and the entire bumper falls off. I'd accept cracks in the paint, scuff marks, a dent, chips etc but not the whole assembly falling off from a light tap! Just like I accept desk dive marks on my watch and scratches etc. But the whole bumper falling off a Range Rover would make me question if there is a quality issue or if it was installed with subpar quality parts.

I don't know maybe the analogy works for you maybe it doesn't. Just telling you how I felt when I saw my ceramic bezel laying on the floor. The tap was so light the coworkers that were with me were conviced the watch was fake. Don't care what they think, just pointing out how light the tap was.

-Up.
vince211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2010, 06:11 AM   #87
wilfreb
"TRF" Member
 
wilfreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 537
still no pics?
still waiting for them.
wilfreb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2010, 06:14 AM   #88
Sose
"TRF" Member
 
Sose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOVA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 1,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilfreb View Post
still no pics?
still waiting for them.
There are none! He sent it in before starting the thread.
Sose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2010, 06:19 AM   #89
Sixxgrand1
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: EXP I & II
Posts: 825
Another reason...

Another reason I went with the EXPII. Truly a take anything-you-can-throw at it Rolex. I hope that you get a fair deal from your AD on the replacement.
Sixxgrand1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 July 2010, 07:00 AM   #90
Mikefxd
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Vancouver BC
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 147
I know that just walking around the house I am always bumping my new watch. No marks so far, but the bump on the corner of the granite counter scared to crap out of me. You expect a watch you pay this much money for to stand up to everyday wear and tear which includes the occasional accidental bump on something.
Mikefxd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.