ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 July 2010, 12:58 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: YL
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 701
|
although the ceramic is very scratch-resistant but it does not cover the platimum numbers. Meaning that the numbers still very easy been scratched.
Anyway, wear with health!
__________________
Instagram: litwing23 |
28 July 2010, 01:02 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
|
I'm sorry to hear it, I hope they pick up the tab for you.
This whole ceramic vs aluminum debate makes me wonder if there was a similar debate when watchmakers switched from acrylic to sapphire. Just like the ceramic dial, sapphire is much more scratch resistant, but will explode if hit just right.... |
28 July 2010, 01:03 PM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Joel
Location: Renton, WA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 2,990
|
Quote:
Sorry to hear thw news Vince.
__________________
___/ /_/ /_____ 16610LV; Ball Diver EMT II \:::::::::::::::/ ~~~~~~~~~~ |
|
28 July 2010, 01:59 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
|
Would you mind posting photos of the broken bezel insert?
And the bezel itself?
|
28 July 2010, 03:29 PM | #65 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
The nurse is just giving me mouth to mouth!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 July 2010, 10:36 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: england
Posts: 251
|
Can someone tell me if the ceramic is place on top of a steel bezel or it made of all ceramic and the steel is placed on the edge of the the cermaic.
If ceramic placed in the steelbezal the surly the bezal is stronger then just ceramic...point is it shouldn't break the easy right! |
28 July 2010, 11:21 PM | #67 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
|
I would LOVE to se Pics!!!
|
28 July 2010, 11:43 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
Not sure this really is a huge issue, I doubt that the ceramic is more likely than sapphire to break when hit, and we all accept that risk just fine.
Also, from what I understand, the ceramic insert is not THAT expensive, the quotes of thousands for a new one include a new bezel (often on TT models) because the watch got dropped and the bezel got bent. The insert alone, I don't believe is that expensive.
__________________
The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist 2002 Rolex Submariner 14060 1963 Omega Automatic LL6304 1953 Wittnauer Revue 2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500 |
29 July 2010, 12:33 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 2,721
|
Quote:
|
|
29 July 2010, 12:35 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: 16610
Posts: 3,290
|
Sorry Bro !! That would make me sick !! I feel for yeah, unfortunately you will probably be on the hook for payment. I think this is going to be a regular occurrence foe ALL ceramic bezels im afraid !
|
29 July 2010, 12:37 AM | #71 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Alex
Location: Back in London
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 380
|
|
29 July 2010, 12:43 AM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Mikey Uí Néill
Location: Olden Texas
Watch: 14060M & 16570
Posts: 1,941
|
|
29 July 2010, 12:54 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
That is bad news, I would be gutted as well.
However I am really surprised that so many here are shocked, it has been said before about the ceramic inserts being scratch resistant but brittle. Would you take a car back to the dealers if a stone flew up and chipped or cracked your windshield and expected them to sort it free of charge?
__________________
So Mote it be. Last edited by Bullyterrier; 29 July 2010 at 01:07 AM.. Reason: added "and expected them to sort it free of charge" |
29 July 2010, 01:04 AM | #74 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
__________________
The safest place for Your Rolex is on Your wrist 2002 Rolex Submariner 14060 1963 Omega Automatic LL6304 1953 Wittnauer Revue 2009 Swiss Army Divemaster 500 |
|
29 July 2010, 01:10 AM | #75 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Vancouver BC
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 147
|
Cost of being first. Anytime a manufacture changes a product there are usually issues. Cars being the biggest offender. It nice to have the newest model but you may paid the price of being a beta tester.
If Rolex see's this happening a lot they will have to change something or word if get out and sales in those models will drop. |
29 July 2010, 06:05 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
Good luck with the repair.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
30 July 2010, 08:41 AM | #77 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
Good points! I guess deep down, I really don't want to get rid of it. I thought if a preloved one in good condition was fetching only $5000, that I would only get $3500 or so for mine with a broken bezel. Also, I am hoping for a repair under warranty at no cost even if the chances are slim. |
|
30 July 2010, 08:42 AM | #78 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
I hit it at an angle, but can't really recall if it hit the watch face or from the side. The contact was with a pole. |
|
30 July 2010, 08:46 AM | #79 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
JJ, Et. al; you guys are right - I should've snapped a pic. The whole point of TRF is to share knowledge and I now realize I missed a chance to do just that by not taking a picture. I contacted the AD just now, but they've already sent the watch off. I do apologize. The best way to describe it is the bezel cracked and snapped as my wrist hit a pole when I was walking in my warehouse. The contact was not harsh at all, but obviously at the right angle and pressure. So there is nothing actually missing from the bezel but it popped off. If you hold the bezel and flex it in opposite directions it comes apart at the "10." However, if the bezel is sitting concave on my desk and there is no pressure then the bezel comes together absolutely perfectly at the "10." Visually until you touch the bezel it looks perfect. There are no chips, no scuff marks, no pieces missing, etc. It literally snapped and I could feel it "spring" off my wrist. Again, I do apologize for not taking pics. It is flat out a mistake that I didn't do it - no excuses. Sorry TRF. |
|
30 July 2010, 09:03 AM | #80 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
|
Quote:
__________________
116710LN 116300blro |
|
30 July 2010, 09:09 AM | #81 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
|
That's a good reason why not to buy the new Sub.
|
30 July 2010, 09:45 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOVA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 1,174
|
|
30 July 2010, 01:02 PM | #83 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
Quote:
__________________
E |
|
30 July 2010, 01:15 PM | #84 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
I'm sorry about your watch and hope you have a favorable out come. But if it were me, and I had hit my watch against a (steel?) pole in a warehouse, and the bezel cracked, I wouldn't exactly expect Rolex to fix it under warranty any more than if I had dropped it on a tile floor and shattered the crystal. I'm sorry if our opinions differ, just my. Good luck!
|
30 July 2010, 01:43 PM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 526
|
I own TT GMT2C "Z" serial, I have hit walls, doors, falling down 12 steps of stairs in Mexico while being drunk, it has scratches all over the watch inc on the crystal.
So far the bezel looks great. any thing can be broken if hit on the right spot so far I have not done it yet, on the other hand just pick up "V" serial sub date , I been told this is last model serial for Sub Date., very light compare to newer models. |
31 July 2010, 06:00 AM | #86 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Watch: Sub-c
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
No insurance on my watch - will look into it now! Hi ronnie, thanks for the post. I certainly understand your opinion. Please allow me to retort. I'll take the car analogy from one of the earlier posts - if you buy a car and crack the bumper because you hit something would you expect the manufacturer to fix it free? No I would not. However, my opinion is that this situation is more like me buying a Range Rover after testing it at the Dealership on their obstacle course. Kind of like buying a tool watch that I am told is robust and to quote the AD when I bought it "I could go diving with it and when I come out of the water just throw the watch on the floor of the boat while I get my wetsuit off." I'm told this Range Rover can literally travel across the Sahara and survive. It can travel up and down mountains in rough terrain, etc, etc eventhough I will never take it offroad. So I take the Range Rover home and after less than a year of ownership and zero abuse to the car I bump into my own garage door at 2 mph in the driveway and the entire bumper falls off. I'd accept cracks in the paint, scuff marks, a dent, chips etc but not the whole assembly falling off from a light tap! Just like I accept desk dive marks on my watch and scratches etc. But the whole bumper falling off a Range Rover would make me question if there is a quality issue or if it was installed with subpar quality parts. I don't know maybe the analogy works for you maybe it doesn't. Just telling you how I felt when I saw my ceramic bezel laying on the floor. The tap was so light the coworkers that were with me were conviced the watch was fake. Don't care what they think, just pointing out how light the tap was. -Up. |
|
31 July 2010, 06:11 AM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 537
|
still no pics?
still waiting for them. |
31 July 2010, 06:14 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOVA
Watch: GMT IIc
Posts: 1,174
|
|
31 July 2010, 06:19 AM | #89 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: EXP I & II
Posts: 825
|
Another reason...
Another reason I went with the EXPII. Truly a take anything-you-can-throw at it Rolex. I hope that you get a fair deal from your AD on the replacement.
|
31 July 2010, 07:00 AM | #90 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mike
Location: Vancouver BC
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 147
|
I know that just walking around the house I am always bumping my new watch. No marks so far, but the bump on the corner of the granite counter scared to crap out of me. You expect a watch you pay this much money for to stand up to everyday wear and tear which includes the occasional accidental bump on something.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.