ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

nickriebe · 4 August 2010, 01:30 AM

Sub C... the DSSD is huge! I would only wear it when needed... like diving in the antarctic or something.

Puffy · 4 August 2010, 01:34 AM

Def Sub C.

DSSD is too chunky and its height/depth is disproportionate to the bracelet and your wrist

Lagunatic · 4 August 2010, 01:54 AM

buy the deepsea

autofiend · 4 August 2010, 03:22 AM

Sub C, but--

I saw a DSSD on a gentleman at the grocery store a few days ago--skinny guy with a skinny wrist, and it looked completely ridiculous. However, you can pull off the DSSD. Go with the one that speaks to you.

brady · 4 August 2010, 03:48 AM

SubC all the way. That thing has grown in its presence so much I mistook some of the first group of pics for the DSSD.

rad87gn · 4 August 2010, 04:07 AM

I vote Sub C.

i5475p · 4 August 2010, 05:32 AM

Go with DSSD:

1. Because it looks good on you and
2. EVERYONE in the world will be wearing the Sub-C. (Just look at this thread.)

I know its #1 for a reason and I will probably end up with a Sub-C myself but Im still in honeymoon phase with my DSSD.

Stand out from the crowd. I had the 16610 and every work function or business trip I was on it seemed that we all had the same watch on. Since I stepped up to the Deep Sea, I havent seen another one yet. Kind of a cool feeling actually.

malaplace · 4 August 2010, 10:19 AM

Deepsea for sure. While touring around Spain this summer, the sub appeared to basically be a woman's watch. Embrace the size of the Deepsea and don't look back.

andrew79 · 4 August 2010, 10:19 AM

sub gets my vote

WatchnRoll · 4 August 2010, 10:21 AM

No surprises from me....Deep Seal all the way.

The Sub C is a great watch but I don't like the case and to me it just looks like any other sub...

The DS is a whole different animal.

My vote is DS

B. Doggy · 4 August 2010, 10:36 AM

Sub c IMHO...

Ebruner · 4 August 2010, 11:50 AM

DSSD 7 days a week. The new sub is a hige disappointment for me.

-Eddie

sea-dweller · 4 August 2010, 12:11 PM

My vote is for the Sub !

ckcspice · 4 August 2010, 12:13 PM

sub c

psv · 4 August 2010, 12:31 PM

Here is the thing, I actually think the DSSD is better looking with the domed crystal - sans cyclops - and slightly larger case, but the thickness of the case is a killer.

If I can revise my statement, as only/everyday watch I'd go for the Sub-C. If you got plenty on rotation and want something extra superlative/unique - go for the DSSD.

eteokles · 4 August 2010, 01:15 PM

The submariner looks great on your wrist - It's a good fit.

Dylan Wade · 4 August 2010, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

Here is the thing, I actually think the DSSD is better looking with the domed crystal - sans cyclops - and slightly larger case, but the thickness of the case is a killer.

If I can revise my statement, as only/everyday watch I'd go for the Sub-C. If you got plenty on rotation and want something extra superlative/unique - go for the DSSD.

Now you're talking more sense, thats what I said too.

m3mike · 2 September 2010, 10:21 AM

this will really depend on your wrist size...its SDDS all the way for those with a 7.5"/+... a subc is way too thin imho.

mkw · 2 September 2010, 10:39 AM

DSSD

ingoodtime · 2 September 2010, 10:47 AM

They both look good. For me, (and I have some big watches) I prefer the smaller sub as it is more comfortable.

z32turbo · 2 September 2010, 10:55 AM

Sub-C gets my vote.

acadianl79 · 2 September 2010, 11:04 AM

DSSD.

Sub C

Michael M. · 2 September 2010, 11:21 AM

Sub-c all the way

Art 1 · 2 September 2010, 11:39 AM

Sub.

tulsaokusa · 2 September 2010, 01:45 PM

DSSD is too much.
Sub-c is balanced.

Sub-c all the way.

tulsaokusa · 2 September 2010, 01:47 PM

DSSD is like hanging a clock on your arm.
Sub-c is a true wrist watch, IMO.

Tijssan · 2 September 2010, 02:04 PM

Sub...

dligg72 · 2 September 2010, 02:07 PM

I don't like how thick the DS looks. SUB-C gets my vote. But wear what you like

gold canyon · 2 September 2010, 02:45 PM

I think the lower profile Sub C looks/is more complimentary on your wrist.

MagedMS · 2 September 2010, 04:50 PM

They both look perfect on your wrist..

4 August 2010, 01:30 AM	#61
nickriebe "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Nick Location: 3026'23N 8638'41W Watch: out for pirates! Posts: 692	Sub C... the DSSD is huge! I would only wear it when needed... like diving in the antarctic or something. __________________ ~Nick Riebe~

4 August 2010, 01:34 AM	#62
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	Def Sub C. DSSD is too chunky and its height/depth is disproportionate to the bracelet and your wrist __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

4 August 2010, 04:07 AM	#66
rad87gn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chad Location: Des Moines, Iowa Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega Posts: 1,607	I vote Sub C. __________________ Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52

4 August 2010, 05:32 AM	#67
i5475p "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: US Watch: 116600 Posts: 68	Go with DSSD: 1. Because it looks good on you and 2. EVERYONE in the world will be wearing the Sub-C. (Just look at this thread.) I know its #1 for a reason and I will probably end up with a Sub-C myself but Im still in honeymoon phase with my DSSD. Stand out from the crowd. I had the 16610 and every work function or business trip I was on it seemed that we all had the same watch on. Since I stepped up to the Deep Sea, I havent seen another one yet. Kind of a cool feeling actually. __________________ _____________________________________________ 116610 116660

4 August 2010, 10:19 AM	#69
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	sub gets my vote __________________ Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232

4 August 2010, 01:54 AM	#63
Lagunatic Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Ron Location: Laguna Niguel, Ca Watch: Rolex 116613LN Posts: 1,724	buy the deepsea

4 August 2010, 03:22 AM	#64
autofiend "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 276	Sub C, but-- I saw a DSSD on a gentleman at the grocery store a few days ago--skinny guy with a skinny wrist, and it looked completely ridiculous. However, you can pull off the DSSD. Go with the one that speaks to you.

4 August 2010, 03:48 AM	#65
brady "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Brady Location: San Antonio Watch: yes please Posts: 525	SubC all the way. That thing has grown in its presence so much I mistook some of the first group of pics for the DSSD.

4 August 2010, 10:19 AM	#68
malaplace "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: CA Posts: 36	Deepsea for sure. While touring around Spain this summer, the sub appeared to basically be a woman's watch. Embrace the size of the Deepsea and don't look back.

4 August 2010, 10:21 AM	#70
WatchnRoll "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 538	No surprises from me....Deep Seal all the way. The Sub C is a great watch but I don't like the case and to me it just looks like any other sub... The DS is a whole different animal. My vote is DS __________________ Navitimer 01 on Black Leather Strap

4 August 2010, 10:36 AM	#71
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Sub c IMHO... __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

4 August 2010, 11:50 AM	#72
Ebruner "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Eddie Location: Kentucky Watch: 118208 Posts: 2,510	DSSD 7 days a week. The new sub is a hige disappointment for me. -Eddie __________________

4 August 2010, 12:11 PM	#73
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	My vote is for the Sub ! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

4 August 2010, 12:13 PM	#74
ckcspice Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: damon Location: Malaysia Watch: 16610 Posts: 95	sub c

4 August 2010, 12:31 PM	#75
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	Here is the thing, I actually think the DSSD is better looking with the domed crystal - sans cyclops - and slightly larger case, but the thickness of the case is a killer. If I can revise my statement, as only/everyday watch I'd go for the Sub-C. If you got plenty on rotation and want something extra superlative/unique - go for the DSSD.

4 August 2010, 01:15 PM	#76
eteokles "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Matt Location: California Posts: 162	The submariner looks great on your wrist - It's a good fit.

2 September 2010, 10:21 AM	#78
m3mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: philippines Posts: 46	this will really depend on your wrist size...its SDDS all the way for those with a 7.5"/+... a subc is way too thin imho.

2 September 2010, 10:39 AM	#79
mkw "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: SF Bay and Tahoe Watch: RB GMT II 3186 Posts: 272	DSSD

2 September 2010, 10:47 AM	#80
ingoodtime "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 2,834	They both look good. For me, (and I have some big watches) I prefer the smaller sub as it is more comfortable. __________________ Lee

2 September 2010, 10:55 AM	#81
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	Sub-C gets my vote. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

2 September 2010, 11:04 AM	#82
acadianl79 Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Canada Watch: Rolex Deep sea Posts: 238	DSSD. Sub C

2 September 2010, 11:21 AM	#83
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	Sub-c all the way

2 September 2010, 11:39 AM	#84
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	Sub.

2 September 2010, 01:45 PM	#85
tulsaokusa Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: N/A Location: N/A Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC Posts: 773	DSSD is too much. Sub-c is balanced. Sub-c all the way.

2 September 2010, 01:47 PM	#86
tulsaokusa Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: N/A Location: N/A Watch: 2010 SS/Black SubC Posts: 773	DSSD is like hanging a clock on your arm. Sub-c is a true wrist watch, IMO.

2 September 2010, 02:04 PM	#87
Tijssan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: GMT+8 Watch: this... Posts: 770	Sub...

2 September 2010, 02:07 PM	#88
dligg72 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: california Posts: 138	I don't like how thick the DS looks. SUB-C gets my vote. But wear what you like

2 September 2010, 02:45 PM	#89
gold canyon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Southwest Watch: R O L E X Posts: 1,188	I think the lower profile Sub C looks/is more complimentary on your wrist.

2 September 2010, 04:50 PM	#90
MagedMS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Maged Location: Egypt Watch: SUBMARINER 114060 Posts: 514	SubC/DSSD They both look perfect on your wrist.. __________________ ROLEX SUBMARINER-114060/116610 LN/116613 LB ROLEX DEEPSEA-116660/116660 DBL/SD43-126600 ROLEX GMT II C-116710 LN/EXPLORER II-216570 BK ROLEX DAYTONA-116503 BLABR ROLEX MILLGAUSS-116400 GV

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)