ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Sixxgrand1 · 17 February 2011, 03:24 PM

Again,.....

IF only Rolex would make the effort to create a decent size date wheel/window like the majority of ALL the other decent manufacturers - this would be a non-issue. I neither care for the cyclops or the miniature date window without it..maybe this year at Basel they will wake up in this regard....it is LONG overdue....and leads to threads like this...

Rolex - r u listening??

duckdown · 17 February 2011, 03:42 PM

I could do without the cyclops as well.

SC11 · 17 February 2011, 06:30 PM

Out of interest what crystal was used on the Sub-C ?

And does anyone know if there is a white on black date wheel that will cross over to the Sub-C ?

Sam

jatco · 18 February 2011, 11:59 AM

I do like the look of the sans-cyclops ...under the perfect photographic shots.. but for us 'seniors' with failing eyesight, I need to see as much as possible... without having to put on glasses...and the glare is often a challenge to deal with....!!!

Wincap · 22 February 2011, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jannal

That LV looks amazing!

Jolu · 23 February 2011, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quattrogeek

I removed the cyclops on my 16710 GMT Master. It took all of about 30 seconds. I used one of the really small pencil-flame torches and positioned the flame tip on the center of the cyclops for maybe 2 seconds, then used a razor blade and it came right off. I cleaned up the little bit of the adhesive residue left with some acetone. It really was simple.

It came right off? Really simple? Hm. Well allow me to retort.

I decided to give it a go. I've had success with brutal force before, but if this way to perform a cyclopsectomy really is as easy and sophisticated as some claim, then there's no need for violence. I even added alcohol to reduce the chance of failure to a minimum.

Did it work? You be the judge:

Johny · 23 February 2011, 11:50 PM

nice one jo.

apeogre · 23 February 2011, 11:54 PM

Great video Jolu

cgjane · 24 February 2011, 12:22 AM

Jolu! I am going to try this today. Thanks for the video.

Jolu · 24 February 2011, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cgjane

Jolu! I am going to try this today. Thanks for the video.

Eeeehm...at your own risk!

cgjane · 24 February 2011, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jolu

Eeeehm...at your own risk!

How long did you wait to use brute force from heating it up last?

I think heating it up helped.

Barryboy · 24 February 2011, 12:51 AM

I seem to remember that someone over here used a soldering iron and (apparently) very easily removed the cyclops.

Rob

sullycape · 24 February 2011, 01:13 AM

Seems like a good way to ruin a fine piece of art.

Wincap · 24 February 2011, 02:02 AM

Great video, I just sent out my BNIB GMTIIC to get a new crystal without a cyclops. Will post pics when it returns.

uhmeebuh · 24 February 2011, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wincap

Great video, I just sent out my BNIB GMTIIC to get a new crystal without a cyclops. Will post pics when it returns.

Congrats! Who did you send it to?

Looking forward to the pics...

Foxglove · 24 February 2011, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wincap

Can this really be done?

http://www.newturfers.com/vb/showthread.php?t=4477

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzhYm...e_gdata_player

Just saw this thread. Since I'm the guy who made that youtube video on my cheapy Invicta -- I feel like I should respond.

My heat method does NOT work for Rolex crystals. However, a fellow WIS just sent me a video reply to my video on how he did it on his Rolex Explorer II. Worked like a charm for him.

And now for a disclaimer: Proceed with caution -- you could ruin your watch.

here's his video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8-33UbhuyE

Cheers,
Ross

EDIT: I see that this video has been posted in the thread already -- woops! It's now linked from my video, so hopefully more people will see it, too.

GeorgeK · 24 February 2011, 05:28 AM

Okay, my turn.
The idea of putting a torch to my watch did not appeal.

I placed it flat on the workbench, and aligned it against a soft wood plank at 9 o'clock.
The with a *sharp* wood chisel applied to the outer edge of the cyclops (at 3 o'clock), one quick small hit with a hammer and it was gone. Cyclops flew away (found it on the floor, not one mark on it)
The tiny glue residue went with some generic paint thinner and a cloth.

I am happier now:

Medtech · 24 February 2011, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jolu

It came right off? Really simple? Hm. Well allow me to retort.

I decided to give it a go. I've had success with brutal force before, but if this way to perform a cyclopsectomy really is as easy and sophisticated as some claim, then there's no need for violence. I even added alcohol to reduce the chance of failure to a minimum.

Did it work? You be the judge:

Thanks Jolu!
Looks like I need to get brutal with this thing....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxglove

Just saw this thread. Since I'm the guy who made that youtube video on my cheapy Invicta -- I feel like I should respond.

My heat method does NOT work for Rolex crystals. However, a fellow WIS just sent me a video reply to my video on how he did it on his Rolex Explorer II. Worked like a charm for him.

And now for a disclaimer: Proceed with caution -- you could ruin your watch.

here's his video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8-33UbhuyE

Cheers,
Ross

EDIT: I see that this video has been posted in the thread already -- woops! It's now linked from my video, so hopefully more people will see it, too.

Ross,
Your vid inspired me to try. I heated it up w/ a hairdryer, then put a soldering iron tip to it....nothing....tried it some more...nothing....then went to the micro torch....didn't budge.

I'm currently soaking an aftermarket crystal in acetone for 2 days, but so far no luck there either.

It's time to get the hammer!!

Jannal · 24 February 2011, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medtech

Thanks Jolu!
Looks like I need to get brutal with this thing....

Ross,
Your vid inspired me to try. I heated it up w/ a hairdryer, then put a soldering iron tip to it....nothing....tried it some more...nothing....then went to the micro torch....didn't budge.

I'm currently soaking an aftermarket crystal in acetone for 2 days, but so far no luck there either.

It's time to get the hammer!!

Heat (mini torch lighter) the cyclops for at least 10 secs.

jmsrolls · 24 February 2011, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Medtech

I'm currently soaking an aftermarket crystal in acetone for 2 days, but so far no luck there either.

As I recall, on the third day in the acetone, I was able to flick the "bubble" off with my thumbnail.

Fr. John†

apeogre · 24 February 2011, 11:00 AM

Took mine off my boschett last night with a hammer and screwdriver. I figure I should try it on something less expensive first.

Medtech · 24 February 2011, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmsrolls

As I recall, on the third day in the acetone, I was able to flick the "bubble" off with my thumbnail.

Fr. John†

Evidently I'm gonna have to wait til day three then, cause right now, even a chisel isn't working.

Evergreen · 24 February 2011, 02:43 PM

Well, the " chisel " and hammer method worked well for me. Hard to smack such a beautiful watch. The crystal cleaned up well with " easy off " oven cleaner.

Wincap · 24 February 2011, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uhmeebuh

Congrats! Who did you send it to?

Looking forward to the pics...

I sent it to your good friend on the west coast. Thanks again, I'll post some pics when I get it back.

karmatp · 24 February 2011, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uhmeebuh

Fr John is the inspiration here. I love the look of my new Sub without the cyclops...

Wow Brandon, I love it. I am not a fan of the cyclops on my Sub C and was already thinking that the only way I would flip this one is if they come of with a no date with all the same features. Now you have me considering removing mine or getting a new crystal.

I think the cyclops screams Rolex which is the last thing I want my watch to do. Your Sub C is amazing, nice work. I did not think the Sub C could get any better, you proved me wrong. I think the new subs are the best subs ever, huge improvements over the previous models, now I just need to see what happens at Basel to see if I will remove mine or buy a no date sub.

quattrogeek · 25 February 2011, 04:00 AM

see, and I was more afraid of taking a Hammer and Filet knife to my Rolex. I suppose to each his own!

Mike1066 · 25 February 2011, 05:53 AM

Of course its easy... it's called purchasing a Sea-Dweller!

uhmeebuh · 25 February 2011, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karmatp

Wow Brandon, I love it. I am not a fan of the cyclops on my Sub C and was already thinking that the only way I would flip this one is if they come of with a no date with all the same features. Now you have me considering removing mine or getting a new crystal.

I think the cyclops screams Rolex which is the last thing I want my watch to do. Your Sub C is amazing, nice work. I did not think the Sub C could get any better, you proved me wrong. I think the new subs are the best subs ever, huge improvements over the previous models, now I just need to see what happens at Basel to see if I will remove mine or buy a no date sub.

Thanks! I'm a big fan of it (as the SubC is my daily wearer) and I do like the date function (mostly out of habit as my phone tells the same info). A no-date Sub-C would be awesome and I hope they debut it at Basel. I'm also hoping for a new Explorer II with a maxi case AND a GMT II with a ceramix Pepsi besel...but now I'm being greedy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike1066

Of course its easy... it's called purchasing a Sea-Dweller!

So true! But what about the maxi dial, updated case, and glide clasp? I think we need a new Sea-Dweller...or maybe it's just a Sub-C without a cyclops

17 February 2011, 03:42 PM	#62
duckdown "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: R Location: Toronto, Canada Watch: d a t e j u s t 2 Posts: 462	I could do without the cyclops as well. __________________ My current "Rolex Fund" savings status: ~$15,000 CAD What am I buying next? I want a solid 18k gold Rolex. Got a great deal I should know about within my budget? Tell me!!

18 February 2011, 11:59 AM	#64
jatco 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Thomas Location: YVR Watch: 116233/79190 Posts: 50,551	I do like the look of the sans-cyclops ...under the perfect photographic shots.. but for us 'seniors' with failing eyesight, I need to see as much as possible... without having to put on glasses...and the glare is often a challenge to deal with....!!! __________________ . ..- ' A Crown for every achievement '

23 February 2011, 11:50 PM	#67
Johny "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: john Location: Scotland Watch: sub 16610Lv Posts: 13,523	nice one jo. __________________ "AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.

24 February 2011, 12:22 AM	#69
cgjane "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Houston Watch: 116509 BlackArabic Posts: 1,176	Jolu! I am going to try this today. Thanks for the video. __________________ Life is an adventure or nothing at all.

24 February 2011, 12:51 AM	#72
Barryboy "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Rob Location: South Wales Watch: 2002 16600 Seadwel Posts: 35	I seem to remember that someone over here used a soldering iron and (apparently) very easily removed the cyclops. Rob __________________ Machines were mice and men were lions once upon a time... but now it's just the opposite, it's twice upon a time.

17 February 2011, 03:24 PM	#61
Sixxgrand1 Banned Join Date: May 2010 Location: Canada Watch: EXP I & II Posts: 825	Again,..... IF only Rolex would make the effort to create a decent size date wheel/window like the majority of ALL the other decent manufacturers - this would be a non-issue. I neither care for the cyclops or the miniature date window without it..maybe this year at Basel they will wake up in this regard....it is LONG overdue....and leads to threads like this... Rolex - r u listening??

17 February 2011, 06:30 PM	#63
SC11 Banned Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Sam Location: UK Watch: AP ☠️ Posts: 6,151	Out of interest what crystal was used on the Sub-C ? And does anyone know if there is a white on black date wheel that will cross over to the Sub-C ? Sam

23 February 2011, 11:54 PM	#68
apeogre "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: No Clue Posts: 586	Great video Jolu

24 February 2011, 01:13 AM	#73
sullycape Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Brian Location: Bass River Watch: OYSTER DATE Posts: 32	Seems like a good way to ruin a fine piece of art.

24 February 2011, 02:02 AM	#74
Wincap Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Victor Location: Long Island (NY) Watch: Rolex Daytona SS Posts: 170	Great video, I just sent out my BNIB GMTIIC to get a new crystal without a cyclops. Will post pics when it returns.

24 February 2011, 05:28 AM	#77
GeorgeK "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: The Alps Posts: 408	Okay, my turn. The idea of putting a torch to my watch did not appeal. I placed it flat on the workbench, and aligned it against a soft wood plank at 9 o'clock. The with a sharp wood chisel applied to the outer edge of the cyclops (at 3 o'clock), one quick small hit with a hammer and it was gone. Cyclops flew away (found it on the floor, not one mark on it) The tiny glue residue went with some generic paint thinner and a cloth. I am happier now: Attached Images

24 February 2011, 11:00 AM	#81
apeogre "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: No Clue Posts: 586	Took mine off my boschett last night with a hammer and screwdriver. I figure I should try it on something less expensive first.

24 February 2011, 02:43 PM	#83
Evergreen Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: W. Washington Watch: Blancpain FF norad Posts: 203	WTB: new crystal for submariner Well, the " chisel " and hammer method worked well for me. Hard to smack such a beautiful watch. The crystal cleaned up well with " easy off " oven cleaner. Attached Images

25 February 2011, 04:00 AM	#86
quattrogeek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Tom Location: Plattsburgh, NY Watch: 16710 GMT II Posts: 11	see, and I was more afraid of taking a Hammer and Filet knife to my Rolex. I suppose to each his own!

25 February 2011, 05:53 AM	#87
Mike1066 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: San Diego, CA Watch: 16600 Posts: 728	Of course its easy... it's called purchasing a Sea-Dweller! __________________ V/R Mike

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)