ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Do you like or dislike the supercase on the stainless steel ceramic submariner? | |||
- I like the SS sub with the maxicase. | 194 | 53.74% | |
- I would like a ceramic sub without the maxicase. | 167 | 46.26% | |
Voters: 361. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
6 April 2011, 12:33 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Batman
Posts: 452
|
The lugs are what turn me off. I prefer the old case. Since Rolex has changed the case size, I am now only limited on buying old case style Rolex watches. I'm trying to like the new case style, but so far, can't.
|
6 April 2011, 12:36 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan USA
Watch: Rolex & Omega 4 Me
Posts: 1,685
|
Quote:
Well put! |
|
6 April 2011, 01:55 AM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Quote:
|
|
6 April 2011, 02:21 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
|
well... probably...
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons. |
6 April 2011, 02:51 AM | #65 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Dr. Chang
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16610, 16622
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Didn't. |
|
6 April 2011, 03:59 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Real Name: Nick
Location: Boston
Watch: Sky-Dweller
Posts: 37
|
Love it!
|
6 April 2011, 04:16 AM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
cop-out, ditto!
Quote:
|
|
6 April 2011, 04:19 AM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
brilliant
|
6 April 2011, 04:22 AM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
then...
|
6 April 2011, 06:52 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
I like the wide lugs, since it makes the Sub-C look bigger, without sacrificing comfort. I've recently had a chance to try on a 41mm Hublot Big Bang, and it looked and felt actually smaller than my Sub-C. Even when I put them both on my wrist, I couldn't believe how bigger the smaller Sub-C looked than the technically bigger Hublot.
Currently the vote result stands at almost 50-50. It would be interesting to repeat this poll 10 years from now. I bet the ratio would then be more like 75-25, in favor of the supercase. |
6 April 2011, 06:54 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,776
|
|
6 April 2011, 08:57 AM | #72 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
I think the new style is great. Heck, I'm getting ready to pull the trigger on a DSSD.
The main thing, in my view, is that many of us did not have a long time to get to love the traditional sub, as we either got into Rolex a little before the new models came around or we arrived here when they were already out. This being the case, it is probably much easier to accept the changes and only look on their bright side. When a brand changes something that you had loved for years, that's a whole different impact, IMO. |
6 April 2011, 09:02 AM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
Quote:
Nicely put! I'm all about Old Skool, despite being reasonably young at 32, but I think what you say makes a lot of sense! But Bah Humbug, all the same! Bring back lug holes!
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
|
7 April 2011, 08:15 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
|
well... I think that the new case "wins" , long life to the maxicase!
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons. |
7 April 2011, 09:00 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne
Watch: AP Diver/SD/GMTIIc
Posts: 228
|
I love the maxi case.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 16600, Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN, Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Offshore Diver, Omega Seamaster Professional, Tudor Pelagos 25600TB, Tudor Black Bay Dark, Zenith Defy Classic IG: @idighorology |
7 April 2011, 09:02 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Har
Location: Tukwila, WA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,571
|
I finally bought the Sub because of the ceramic bezel and the maxi case.
|
7 April 2011, 10:09 PM | #77 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
|
Quote:
|
|
7 April 2011, 10:14 PM | #78 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,533
|
I voted for the maxi. I have both but think the maxi is the future and with the maxi case we get the new clasp.
__________________
E |
8 April 2011, 04:25 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
|
I really don't like it
it is too fat and not at all elegant |
8 April 2011, 05:53 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Not as elegant as a watch with a green insert?
__________________
My grails: |
8 April 2011, 05:59 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
|
Love it!!!
__________________
Always working...by choice |
9 April 2011, 01:57 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 206
|
|
9 April 2011, 02:02 AM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
|
I liked it enough to purchase a brand new one yesterday.
|
9 April 2011, 02:19 AM | #84 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Dr. Chang
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16610, 16622
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Rolex have learned they made a mistake and introduced the new exp2 42mm...naturally without the supercase |
|
9 April 2011, 02:32 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Just curious but why would you think rolex would make all of their watches with exactly the same case? The sub and many others have not had the same case as for instance the daytona. The supercase is likely around for quite some time, I suspect more than the ten years you refer to. I find it very interesting that a small number of people on a forum feel that they know better than a successful watch company what they will or should do. If the sub c (in all of it's versions) and GMTII C were not selling well then I could see rolex making a change earlier, but they seem to still be good sellers.
|
9 April 2011, 04:59 AM | #86 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Quote:
When I am exasperated with a post or thread I try to be civil. Sorry to all if I offend. |
|
9 April 2011, 05:51 AM | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
|
|
9 April 2011, 05:53 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scandinavia
Watch: ♛
Posts: 1,330
|
I like the supercase, but rather buy the old case subs since they fit me better and are a dying breed
|
9 April 2011, 05:54 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
|
9 April 2011, 05:55 AM | #90 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
Looks like pretty close results..
Personally, I LOVE the super cases.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.