ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 September 2012, 05:50 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 6
|
I already saw My friends gs... Amazingly... Thats watch is very2 good in finishing... Very smooth... And very perfect in every detail...
Now i am understand why this watch have a high price... Very artistic... This watch will be my next wishlist... |
7 September 2012, 02:38 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
|
i think that the gs seikos are great, and i definatly have one on my wishlist.
|
14 September 2012, 01:49 PM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
I got to handle a few, a high beat, dual time, and a normal auto. I couldn't see the finish because it was covered in plastic but I could tell that the watches are of an extremely high caliber (no pun intended). Definitely better than Rolex. Arguably, the best value to quality ratio available today. It's just a huge shame that Seiko made a name for itself in the extreme low end and 99% of the consumers still see them as a low end company and not the innovative giants they really are. I wonder how it would've been if Seiko went the Lexus > Toyota or Infinity > Nissan route? I suspect that if they had rebranded the GS, they would've sold better outside Japan. Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
14 September 2012, 09:12 PM | #64 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: Breitling
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
I gotta admit all these grand seiko pictures everyone is posting is turning me on... |
|
14 September 2012, 09:16 PM | #65 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: Breitling
Posts: 27
|
Now if we are asking Rolex or Grand Seiko... which is the question, I'd still say Rolex all the way, in every way. That's my opinion. Not that the seiko isn't as good, it is, and it's an amazing watch, and better value.. But Rolex has the name which matters to some people, not to others. I still like how Rolex looks better, and the crown logo is just boss (lol). But you say you already have a rolex, so there ya go, add a seiko to the collection and be happy, great watch. I love everything japanese, especially the women! I may grab a GS... one day! But I gotta save for a breitling navitimer or montbrillant first
|
3 October 2012, 09:08 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Actually, Rolex beats everybody in those two categories, so its no surprise. As for quality, pricing and innovation, Grand Seiko hands down. If GS was from a known Swiss brand, it would sell upwards of $10,000 for their basic auto. If Rolex was a Japanese brand, it would sell for less than GS now. Won't talk about style because that's subjective. But, if I were to pick between the two, I would still go with Rolex. Servicing is very important to me and I understand GS service is costly. Rolex, on the other hand charges very reasonably and they're quick. Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
3 October 2012, 09:44 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Grand Seiko's are an awesome watch, but it would be highly unlikely they'd be anyone's first nice watch. People looking to get into a luxury watch would go for a luxury brand first. ie Rolex. Then another Rolex. And another. Then they might consider an AP, a PP, perhaps a VC or a Lange. At that stage, they're mature enough to appreciate a Grand Seiko.
Just my opinion :-) |
3 October 2012, 01:48 PM | #68 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 673
|
Re:
I wouldn't say Rolex beats everyone in service (nor PP or ALS for resale) but in the service field, they won't service watches over 50 years old. This can be a major concern if you want to pass down or were passed down a watch from one generation to the next.
The service is top notch, but I wouldn't go so far as to say it has everybody beat. Quote:
|
|
3 October 2012, 03:18 PM | #69 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Honitel
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 148
|
I like strap that blends and make the watch even attractive like yours Ran.
|
3 October 2012, 05:12 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
But, you're right about the 50 year limit. It blows. Hopefully, a good parts manufacturer will start making viable parts for old Rolexes. In terms of resale, again, I'm talking about the Rolex resale market in those countries mentioned and it has always been great. Even 2nd hand shops (in HK at least) are willing to buy any Rolex for 85% market value. Even AP gets a little less at about 80%. That's in second hand shops, if you sell on your own, you can get better deals. Of course, PP/ALS are better watches overall, but they're at a price that not everyone can afford here, and if there aren't that many takers to begin with, resale can and does suffer. (though I can't say with absolute certainty cause I've never had an ALS or PP).
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
4 October 2012, 05:38 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 673
|
"(though I can't say with absolute certainty cause I've never had an ALS or PP)"
Me either - ah some day! (Though actually probably wouldn't get a PP, at that price I prefer the look of most of the ALS's more) |
4 October 2012, 08:30 AM | #72 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
4 October 2012, 09:28 AM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
4 October 2012, 11:16 AM | #74 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
|
Quote:
|
|
4 October 2012, 03:39 PM | #75 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
Awesome, congrats!!
Kinda late to the GS party but now that I'm here, sure am enjoying myself. Great pieces, outstanding value . . . .
|
4 October 2012, 04:15 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
DRHR, which model is that in your second photo??? I really like that one!!
|
5 October 2012, 05:55 PM | #77 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
|
5 October 2012, 08:14 PM | #78 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
Quote:
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
|
5 October 2012, 08:16 PM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,199
|
I like the first one, the SBGR019. I've never seen that kind of bracelet, is that new or is it an older model?
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
Rolex TT Datejust, Panerai PAM 312, Omega Connie C-Shape, Anonimo D-Date II, Squale 20 Atmos Blue Ray, Concord Impresario Triple Date Chrono Seiko SKX007, Monster Tuna |
6 October 2012, 02:23 AM | #80 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Is there some logic to how they name watches? It seems like a random set of letters, followed by a random set of numbers, but I've never tried to figure it out. That's the only thing I dislike about Grand Seiko.
|
6 October 2012, 02:25 AM | #81 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Because different markets have different levels of price elasticity. Any revenue maximizing firm will price different in different markets.
|
6 October 2012, 02:59 AM | #82 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
It's an older, discontinued model. Of the 3 that I own, it is the one that feels the most substantial from a heft/weight perspective, which I love. And the bracelet is awesome in terms of quality. Again, just feels heavier/more substantial, especially on the wrist. The SBGW041 came with both bracelet and strap, and while the bracelet is fine/comfortabale, it does not feel as good as the one on the 019. I use the black strap because it offsets/highlights the dial better in my opinion. . . .
|
6 October 2012, 03:04 AM | #83 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
I'm not quite sure myself, being fairly new to the Seiko fan club. Never tried to figure it out either but seems to be very accurate when seeking information. As I was corresponding with the retailers/sellers, mentioning the piece by it's respective codes gets immediate/correct info (perhaps that can be said for every other manufacturer, I'm sure).
|
6 October 2012, 03:10 AM | #84 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
They are lovely watches, and I hope they become more widely recognized (though not more expensive). |
|
6 October 2012, 03:47 AM | #85 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
|
|
7 October 2012, 01:54 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pacifica, CA
Watch: Double Red SD
Posts: 308
|
Having model numbers instead of names seems common to a lot of Japanese products, and I guess German for that matter too. Look at electronics. It's only a recent phenomenon that we are finally getting names for things. I guess it's a lot easier to find a number rather than pay a marketing dept for a name.
|
19 January 2013, 10:04 PM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oman
Posts: 1
|
Amazing watch!!! I didn't have the balls to buy a Seiko and bought a Rolex for selling value but the Seiko movements are just superior! Congratz!
I might buy one soon too. And btw the Japanese are also well known for there excellent cars... Nissan GTR, Lexus LFA. Would be more then happy to own a GTR, it beats a Porsche 911 Turbo on all aspects in performance. |
24 February 2013, 12:03 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brooklyn ny
Watch: Rolex sub
Posts: 504
|
Im a Rolex fan but ill take that in titanium over any rolex dd any day. Any doubts, just put it on your wrist for a day for yourself, not to show how in fashion you are for others.
|
10 March 2013, 01:56 PM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 65
|
The GS is a fantastic timepiece, compared to a Rolex Datejust its a better built watch. The GS has a solid feel to it. The dial, the markers are polished to a brilliant shine. IMHO you can't go wrong with a GS for a watch, but if you want recognition go Rolex.
|
10 March 2013, 11:22 PM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Shah alam
Posts: 17
|
I will said GS quality is on the top notch for that price point, I personally own a GS sbge001, rolex 216570 and 116660, I will said in term of quality it is better than my 2 rolex in some aspect, in fact the GS is on my wrist most of the time. This is just my own opinion.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.