ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cajunron · 8 April 2012, 01:55 PM

Maybe we should stop pointing out what the counterfeiters are doing wrong? It seems like they are trying to find out the fakes' weak spots.

dbphotos · 8 April 2012, 02:57 PM

Amazing! Simply amazing!

cedargrove · 9 April 2012, 12:09 AM

(again)

slipperman · 9 April 2012, 02:30 PM

Very humorous read here, but some of you better give your heads a shake.
The watch is real.

GradyPhilpott · 10 April 2012, 02:18 AM

The hands give it away also.

The real one has the wider hands.

simonmcc · 10 April 2012, 02:30 AM

If this is a rep then it's a very good one. The Rolex engraving looks spot on and the SEL's look tight. The pearl looks flawless too.

T-Rip · 10 April 2012, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexfan11

THIS WATCH IS NOT FAKE.....you guys dont know crap, I am sorry

You must be friend....nice try

T-Rip · 10 April 2012, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue rocket

agreed, not sure why you all think this is fake...it's completely gen. I guarantee it sports a authentic Rolex movement when it's opened up.

How do you know that?

Besides being his friend and trying to pass this fake POS watch here on TRF...

robertneville · 10 April 2012, 06:58 AM

Devil is in the detail. IBTL.

BOA · 10 April 2012, 10:53 AM

There's a lot of fakes in this thread. Easy to tell them apart too.

scocope · 10 April 2012, 02:48 PM

"There's a lot of fakes in this thread. Easy to tell them apart too."

I'm sure you are not just referring to watches, are you?

mailman · 10 April 2012, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue rocket

One, you're an idiot --

Good for you... you're wrong,

One, take five points for insulting another member.

Think it's OK to treat people like this on TRF? Good for you...you're wrong

Andelain · 10 April 2012, 07:41 PM

Wonder what his next username will be...........

TattooedGQ · 10 April 2012, 11:09 PM

This keeps getting better and better.

subtona · 10 April 2012, 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexfan11

THIS WATCH IS NOT FAKE.....you guys dont know crap, I am sorry

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipperman

Very humorous read here, but some of you better give your heads a shake.
The watch is real.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue rocket

agreed, not sure why you all think this is fake...it's completely gen. I guarantee it sports a authentic Rolex movement when it's opened up.

3 guys with the least time on the forum are convinced that the watch is real and siding with a guy who was in fact banned under another name for trying to vet a fake watch through the forum members vs all others that have spent significant time here and have demonstrated they are genuine individuals.

:dummy :

going to have to assume the worst here.

Blong · 11 April 2012, 12:44 AM

He is banned...as odie2355 and also banned as rolexresearch so he cant respond under one of those names. The OP will have to come up with a new alias to post more pics....

You should buy it from him....buy the one he said was from his fiancé...that one looked more real than this one....

T-Rip · 11 April 2012, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blue rocket

last thing i'm going to say... it is odd that the OP hasn't responded here... is he a troll, who knows. there's only one way to end this...have him open the case and post photos of the movement...that will end it once and for all.

The reason the op hasn't responded is because he's been BANNED for posting fake watches...you're so quick to call names but why don't you read the entire thread before you run your mouth...

floater156 · 11 April 2012, 12:47 AM

What are these guys hoping to accomplish by getting fake watches verified as real on this forum?

Kevin B · 11 April 2012, 12:48 AM

Quote:

The reason the op hasn't responded is because he's been BANNED for posting fake watches

You beat me to that one before I could hit the "post" tab

ratae1950 · 11 April 2012, 12:50 AM

Interesting thread

I am not a Rolex authority, but I do a lot of highly detailed design work. Upon review of the watch in question the differences between it and verifiable Rolex to me are in order of clarity:

The 3 of 300m is not directly below the R in MARINER above.
the f in ft is too short.
The = between ft and 300m is off and the space it sits in too large.
The cyclops appears to be off center with the horizontal axis of the dial.

Thank you every one for making me look more carefully. Keep up the good work!

scocope · 11 April 2012, 01:30 AM

If Mr. Blue Rocket is not a troll why has he gone off line before he has responded to Ratae 1950's post, which was up while Blue Rocket was on line? A very simple way to dissuade all of us from believing he is a troll, is to apologize for the use of the term "idiot" and acknowlege the demonstrated fact the watch is a fake. I will then apologize for the use of the term troll because he will have demonstrated he is not one. I, however, am not holding my breath for this to happen.

T-Rip · 11 April 2012, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scocope

If Mr. Blue Rocket is not a troll why has he gone off line before he has responded to Ratae 1950's post which was up while Blue Rocket was on line? A very simple way to dissuade all of us from believing he is a troll, is to apologize for the use of the term "idiot" and acknowlege the demonstrated fact the watch is a fake. I will then apologize for the use of the term troll because he will have demonstrated he is not one. I, however, am not holding my breath for this to happen.

Well put...

subtona · 11 April 2012, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floater156

What are these guys hoping to accomplish by getting fake watches verified as real on this forum?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mosco

IMHO, this guy is doing research. Stop helping him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleddog

100% right Greg!

In fact, the previous alias of this 'user' (I'd like to politely say fakester), was rolexresearch.....How's that for coincidence?!?!?

The watch is fake, as is the poster!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=226719

These goons are only posting here to see how well they can pass a fake to the legitimate members who appreciate the REAL thing!!
Be aware......Very aware~

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratae1950

Interesting thread

I am not a Rolex authority, but I do a lot of highly detailed design work. Upon review of the watch in question the differences between it and verifiable Rolex to me are in order of clarity:

The 3 of 300m is not directly below the R in MARINER above.
the f in ft is too short.
The = between ft and 300m is off and the space it sits in too large.
The cyclops appears to be off center with the horizontal axis of the dial.

Thank you every one for making me look more carefully. Keep up the good work!

T-Rip · 11 April 2012, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floater156

What are these guys hoping to accomplish by getting fake watches verified as real on this forum?

If the watch passes the "sniff" test then its easier for them to either sell it on ebay or craigslist... also if they are in cahoots with the manufacturer of fake watches (most likely not the reason here) they can use the feedback from us and adjust the watch details accordingly to make it better.

I think its funny when other "members" go to bat for TROLLS.....

Kevin B · 11 April 2012, 02:22 AM

Quote:

What are these guys hoping to accomplish by getting fake watches verified as real on this forum?

Quote:

I am not a Rolex authority, but I do a lot of highly detailed design work. Upon review of the watch in question the differences between it and verifiable Rolex to me are in order of clarity:

The 3 of 300m is not directly below the R in MARINER above.
the f in ft is too short.
The = between ft and 300m is off and the space it sits in too large.
The cyclops appears to be off center with the horizontal axis of the dial.

Thank you every one for making me look more carefully. Keep up the good work!

There's your answer

. Like many others have said in the "watch out" area, stop doing thier homework for them! This is information that some day may come back to bite you or someone you know in the rear end. How much more clearly can it be stated?

HORNBLOWER · 11 April 2012, 02:33 AM

oyster perpetual text on dial looks very dodgy also the = is in the wrong position, way out!

ratae1950 · 11 April 2012, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin B

There's your answer

. Like many others have said in the "watch out" area, stop doing thier homework for them! This is information that some day may come back to bite you or someone you know in the rear end. How much more clearly can it be stated?

Nice to know I have a use in life.......

I think the moral of the 'story' is that if you intend parting with $$$$ for a watch, you buy from a trusted vendor. I would assume the purpose of a Watch Out section is to help prevent criminals selling fake watches to uninformed people [me before TRF].

The issue of aiding and abetting the fraudsters is an interesting one and worthy of a calm and rational debate vis a vis the pros and cons of Watch Out.. Maybe the 'fishing posts' need to be closed early on.

slipperman · 11 April 2012, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subtona

3 guys with the least time on the forum are convinced that the watch is real and siding with a guy who was in fact banned under another name for trying to vet a fake watch through the forum members vs all others that have spent significant time here and have demonstrated they are genuine individuals.

:dummy :

going to have to assume the worst here.

dude, i have been here longer than you, just because i don't post often does not diminish my knowledge thank you.

Kevin B · 11 April 2012, 04:03 AM

Quote:

I would assume the purpose of a Watch Out section is to help prevent criminals selling fake watches to uninformed people [me before TRF].

True, but unfortunately the bad guys don't always use it for it's intended purposes.

Quote:

The issue of aiding and abetting the fraudsters is an interesting one and worthy of a calm and rational debate vis a vis the pros and cons of Watch Out.. Maybe the 'fishing posts' need to be closed early on.

If I came across as agitated or irrational I sincerely apologize as that was not my intention. Sometimes these threads take a little while to show their true intentions and therefore are able to progress. There is a fine line between just spouting "FAKE" and pointing out every little detail. Again, if I came across rudely, please accept my apology.

subtona · 11 April 2012, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipperman

Very humorous read here, but some of you better give your heads a shake.
The watch is real.

Quote:

Originally Posted by slipperman

dude, i have been here longer than you, just because i don't post often does not diminish my knowledge thank you.

yes you have been a member longer than me, but you are bolstering up the OP who has been banned on at least 2 occasions with specific regard to counterfeit watches.

if you have been participating even passively, imho your willingness to bet on a someone with that history is surprising?

for me, if the watch is real or fake has taken a back seat to what seems to have started directly as an inauthentic thread from the OP.

8 April 2012, 01:55 PM	#61
cajunron 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Southeastern USA Watch: Omega Seamaster PO Posts: 3,872	Maybe we should stop pointing out what the counterfeiters are doing wrong? It seems like they are trying to find out the fakes' weak spots. __________________

8 April 2012, 02:57 PM	#62
dbphotos "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: David Location: Texas Watch: your 6! Posts: 898	Amazing! Simply amazing! __________________ www.DavidBailey.com Rolex DD YG 18238 \| Rolex 1675 Pepsi \| Rolex 14060 \| Rolex Vintage 6694 \| Rolex TT 16013 \| Tudor Tiger 79280P on Shark strap \| a whole bunch of misc watches

10 April 2012, 02:18 AM	#65
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	The hands give it away also. The real one has the wider hands. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

10 April 2012, 06:58 AM	#69
robertneville "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Greg Location: PA Watch: me burn Posts: 1,435	Devil is in the detail. IBTL. __________________ Motocross is life! Last edited by robertneville; 10 April 2012 at 06:58 AM.. Reason: Tyop

10 April 2012, 02:48 PM	#71
scocope Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Iowa Posts: 108	"There's a lot of fakes in this thread. Easy to tell them apart too." I'm sure you are not just referring to watches, are you? Last edited by scocope; 10 April 2012 at 02:49 PM.. Reason: words

9 April 2012, 12:09 AM	#63
cedargrove "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: Canada Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc Posts: 3,013	(again)

9 April 2012, 02:30 PM	#64
slipperman "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: westcoast Posts: 134	Very humorous read here, but some of you better give your heads a shake. The watch is real.

10 April 2012, 02:30 AM	#66
simonmcc "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: UK Posts: 180	If this is a rep then it's a very good one. The Rolex engraving looks spot on and the SEL's look tight. The pearl looks flawless too.

10 April 2012, 10:53 AM	#70
BOA "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Bruce Location: Chicago, IL Watch: Meteorite DD Posts: 2,410	There's a lot of fakes in this thread. Easy to tell them apart too.

10 April 2012, 07:41 PM	#73
Andelain "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: The Sandbox Watch: ing your 6...... Posts: 1,379	Wonder what his next username will be........... __________________ .

10 April 2012, 11:09 PM	#74
TattooedGQ "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Justin Location: NY, USA Watch: yo self! Posts: 2,686	This keeps getting better and better. __________________ That boy's got the Devil in him. Rolex: I think I'm up to 9?? Omega: Got a few of those too. Breitling: And some of these.

11 April 2012, 12:44 AM	#76
Blong "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Brian Location: Manhattan Watch: 116520 Black Posts: 287	He is banned...as odie2355 and also banned as rolexresearch so he cant respond under one of those names. The OP will have to come up with a new alias to post more pics.... You should buy it from him....buy the one he said was from his fiancé...that one looked more real than this one....

11 April 2012, 12:47 AM	#78
floater156 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Chris Location: Wisconsin Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,984	What are these guys hoping to accomplish by getting fake watches verified as real on this forum? __________________ Lead by example through production.

11 April 2012, 12:50 AM	#80
ratae1950 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Cambridge Ma Posts: 2,331	Interesting thread I am not a Rolex authority, but I do a lot of highly detailed design work. Upon review of the watch in question the differences between it and verifiable Rolex to me are in order of clarity: The 3 of 300m is not directly below the R in MARINER above. the f in ft is too short. The = between ft and 300m is off and the space it sits in too large. The cyclops appears to be off center with the horizontal axis of the dial. Thank you every one for making me look more carefully. Keep up the good work! Attached Images __________________ Yunnoworameenmiduck

11 April 2012, 01:30 AM	#81
scocope Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Iowa Posts: 108	If Mr. Blue Rocket is not a troll why has he gone off line before he has responded to Ratae 1950's post, which was up while Blue Rocket was on line? A very simple way to dissuade all of us from believing he is a troll, is to apologize for the use of the term "idiot" and acknowlege the demonstrated fact the watch is a fake. I will then apologize for the use of the term troll because he will have demonstrated he is not one. I, however, am not holding my breath for this to happen. Last edited by scocope; 11 April 2012 at 01:33 AM.. Reason: words

11 April 2012, 02:33 AM	#86
HORNBLOWER "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Real Name: Ben Location: Ireland Watch: 1 OR 2 Posts: 2,640	oyster perpetual text on dial looks very dodgy also the = is in the wrong position, way out!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)