ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

GradyPhilpott · 14 May 2012, 09:11 PM

It is of course your choice and you have many opinions already, so I will take the road less traveled and suggest either 14060M, your original choice, or the 114060, when it hits the market.

I'm not knocking either the SD or the DSSD.

I just happen to like the two I suggested better.

big972 · 14 May 2012, 09:14 PM

DSSD for me...

Daniel Tan · 15 May 2012, 08:45 PM

Go all out for DSSD... Satisfaction Guarantee... 100% No regret....

d6194m · 15 May 2012, 10:55 PM

Get the one that fits you best and sings to you, since you have to be happy with it.

Seadweller 16600's time has come and gone (no pund intended). It has been replaced by the 116660. The 16600 is inferior to the 116660 in every which way you chose to compare. For a few thousand more you can hve one of the mightiest dive watches, which is the DSSD so I say go with the DSSD.

A person can always find beauty in the 16600 but when you pick both of them up at the same time, you know the DSSD is the undisputed king. by a mile.

datejust24 · 15 May 2012, 11:05 PM

16600 Sea Dweller for me...classic.

wardman · 15 May 2012, 11:25 PM

Just chose the Subc myself. Looked long and hard at the SeaDweller but it wore smaller and without the new bracelet/clasp, I thought it was not the right watch as my only Rolex and everyday wear.

Good luck!

Tri-National-Man · 16 May 2012, 05:48 AM

I tried on the DSSD and found it too monstrous...I love my 14060M and am rapidly falling in love with my SD - Feels really solid and rarer than the Sub date - If that's what you like..

h999r · 16 May 2012, 12:36 PM

If you like modern look go DSSD, if you prefer classic look SD.

gwalker · 16 May 2012, 02:01 PM

My dream Rolex would be an updated SD4000 with new clasp and ceramic bezel. I have a DSSD but the original SD really is an iconic watch. If my only watch I'd go with the SD. The DSSD is best as part of a collection.

Lagunatic · 16 May 2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gwalker

My dream Rolex would be an updated SD4000 with new clasp and ceramic bezel. I have a DSSD but the original SD really is an iconic watch. If my only watch I'd go with the SD. The DSSD is best as part of a collection.

polarinda · 16 May 2012, 02:36 PM

the sd is like a jewel.
the dssd is like a machine.

the 14060 is the beater
the 16610 is the beater with a date.

View Poll Results: Your pick.
Dweller	119	51.07%
Deep Sea	88	37.77%
Something else	26	11.16%
Voters: 233. You may not vote on this poll

14 May 2012, 09:11 PM	#61
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,460	It is of course your choice and you have many opinions already, so I will take the road less traveled and suggest either 14060M, your original choice, or the 114060, when it hits the market. I'm not knocking either the SD or the DSSD. I just happen to like the two I suggested better. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

14 May 2012, 09:14 PM	#62
big972 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Australia Watch: 16613LN & 126660 Posts: 74	DSSD for me... __________________ 1500 SS Date\|16233 TT Datejust\|116333 TT Datejust II\|16613LN TT Submariner\|126660 Rolex Sea-Dweller Deapsea \|CAN1010 SS AquaRacer Grande Date Chrono\|CAC1110 SS TAG Heuer Formula 1 Chrono\|51-2273 Citizen Divers Automatic -Dubium Sapientiae Initium-

15 May 2012, 08:45 PM	#63
Daniel Tan Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: daniel tan Location: Malaysia Watch: DSSD DJ EXPII PAM Posts: 210	Go all out for DSSD... Satisfaction Guarantee... 100% No regret....

15 May 2012, 10:55 PM	#64
d6194m Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Palm Springs Posts: 32	Get the one that fits you best and sings to you, since you have to be happy with it. Seadweller 16600's time has come and gone (no pund intended). It has been replaced by the 116660. The 16600 is inferior to the 116660 in every which way you chose to compare. For a few thousand more you can hve one of the mightiest dive watches, which is the DSSD so I say go with the DSSD. A person can always find beauty in the 16600 but when you pick both of them up at the same time, you know the DSSD is the undisputed king. by a mile.

15 May 2012, 11:05 PM	#65
datejust24 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: Cincinnati,Ohio Watch: Rolexssss Posts: 3,504	16600 Sea Dweller for me...classic.

15 May 2012, 11:25 PM	#66
wardman "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: PA Watch: Sub-c date Posts: 192	Just chose the Subc myself. Looked long and hard at the SeaDweller but it wore smaller and without the new bracelet/clasp, I thought it was not the right watch as my only Rolex and everyday wear. Good luck!

16 May 2012, 05:48 AM	#67
Tri-National-Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Shaun Location: Devonshire Watch: SubND/D/LV Posts: 651	I tried on the DSSD and found it too monstrous...I love my 14060M and am rapidly falling in love with my SD - Feels really solid and rarer than the Sub date - If that's what you like..

16 May 2012, 12:36 PM	#68
h999r Banned Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: HR Location: Planet Earth Watch: -ing Barts. Posts: 4,244	If you like modern look go DSSD, if you prefer classic look SD.

16 May 2012, 02:01 PM	#69
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	My dream Rolex would be an updated SD4000 with new clasp and ceramic bezel. I have a DSSD but the original SD really is an iconic watch. If my only watch I'd go with the SD. The DSSD is best as part of a collection.

16 May 2012, 02:36 PM	#71
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	the sd is like a jewel. the dssd is like a machine. the 14060 is the beater the 16610 is the beater with a date.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)