ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Eulogy · 10 May 2012, 02:37 AM

Maybe if I did something like that to my Sub D I could muffle my desire for a SeaDweller. At least for awhile...

Hesh · 10 May 2012, 03:14 AM

Would love to see how the 42EII 216570 looks without the cyclops!

joesephcho · 10 May 2012, 03:28 AM

With or without, still looks great!

AWS · 10 May 2012, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jolu

Here are a few (black, white, with cyclop and without):

http://s91.photobucket.com/albums/k3...es/ExplorerII/

Jolu, your pictures are always amazing. Thanks for sharing!

Linzjnr · 10 May 2012, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

As a fan of the iconic cyclops can't say I like that. However, since I'm a true believer in wearing what you want, how you want, if it frosts your flakes then go for it!
dP

I'm with Dan, it's something that makes a Rolex stand apart from others, iconic indeed.

10 May 2012, 02:37 AM	#61
Eulogy "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Mark Location: Florida Watch: 1803 and 16610 Posts: 170	Maybe if I did something like that to my Sub D I could muffle my desire for a SeaDweller. At least for awhile...

10 May 2012, 03:14 AM	#62
Hesh "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Andy Location: NJ Watch: SUBc Posts: 34	Would love to see how the 42EII 216570 looks without the cyclops!

10 May 2012, 03:28 AM	#63
joesephcho "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Submariner ND Posts: 188	With or without, still looks great!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)