ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 July 2012, 05:10 PM | #61 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
Have you thought of daydate 2
|
5 July 2012, 05:13 PM | #62 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: sweden
Watch: Deep Sea Dweller
Posts: 52
|
well i got a the Omega Seamaster Diver and the Rolex DSSD.. I only use the Omega when the cuff is to tight 4 the rolex.. they are not even close..
|
5 July 2012, 05:26 PM | #63 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
|
5 July 2012, 05:33 PM | #64 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: thailand
Posts: 23
|
DSSD....all the way !
you want presence ? dssd! you are a big guy? dssd! you want people to know what you are about? dssd nuff said- |
5 July 2012, 06:20 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 107
|
One of my favourite features of the Rolex is the triple lock crown. The crown on the Omega feels flimsy in comparison. Rolex has a superior bracelet and clasp. No micro adjustment on the Omega and despite now using end screws the bracelet links still ride on pins. Both movements are COSC. The Rolex is tried and tested. Not pretty but very robust. The Omega 8500 is technically superior but time will tell whether it is more durable and reliable.
|
5 July 2012, 06:50 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Louisville KY
Watch: crazy
Posts: 634
|
It took me all night to find this.
__________________
Instagram is jackw3bb https://www.instagram.com/jackw3bb/ |
5 July 2012, 07:08 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: London
Watch: 114060LB
Posts: 3,986
|
Looking at the wrist shots I would have to say that, as much as I love Omegas, the DSSD simply screams 'quality'.
I have an old Seamaster and it's my everyday watch but the hands on the new PO look clunky to me whereas the Rolex hands ooze class. I have a new SubC LV and when I'm going out for the evening the Omega stays at home I'm afraid. |
5 July 2012, 07:32 PM | #68 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
Rolex Submariner
|
5 July 2012, 07:44 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 1,944
|
I'm going to say get the PO first, then save for the DSSD. The alternative would be only to speed the process by flipping the PO, if you don't love it.
Forget the DJ, doesn't sound like your thing. |
5 July 2012, 08:00 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: South Central
Watch: PO 2200.50
Posts: 37
|
Yachtmaster. Looks like a sub, it's somewhat blingy, but you don't see them everywhere.
|
5 July 2012, 08:26 PM | #71 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Boston
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 63
|
I appreciate OP's honesty, but the gals he's looking for probably can't even tell time nevermind recognize a high-end watch.
OP: Get the watch that you like best. The models you are looking at are all great and, in the end, when you find out that watches are not the key to a woman's fun parts, you'll at least have a great timepiece. |
5 July 2012, 08:48 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
You'd do fine with either DSSD or PO/8500 in 45mm for no other reason than having a fine time piece. Buy the one that sings to you the most. Period.
Happy hunting! |
5 July 2012, 09:33 PM | #73 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Watch: DSSD, TT sub
Posts: 532
|
Another vote for the DSSD. Everything already said about the size, heft & presence holds true. That said, I love the PO and gave it serious consideration. Eventually I decided I like the DSSD more and will add a PO somewhere down the line. Both are awesome to me--good luck with your decision.
|
5 July 2012, 09:35 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 40
|
Surely this would be perfect: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=242109
|
5 July 2012, 09:38 PM | #75 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CT
Posts: 134
|
The deep sea, then followed by a Ferrari parked out front. :)
|
5 July 2012, 10:59 PM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Have you still not tried on the 41mm DJ II (2) like everyone suggested? Because in your pics, that is still just the standard 36mm.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
5 July 2012, 11:09 PM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
|
5 July 2012, 11:16 PM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
|
5 July 2012, 11:19 PM | #79 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Quote:
|
|
5 July 2012, 11:24 PM | #80 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
Finding a watch that appeals to, probably dumb, certainly materialistic , woman and watch enthusiasts will be hard. Many watch enthusiasts are turned off of Rolex due to many of the sentiments expressed in your post. With that said, the Deep Sea probably comes the closest. |
|
5 July 2012, 11:30 PM | #81 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
6 July 2012, 12:19 AM | #82 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
Quote:
Get something that looks great on you. Enjoy. |
|
6 July 2012, 01:31 AM | #83 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
|
Shouldn't even be a choice, Rolex all the way.i got the sub and I'm a 6'2" 265 lb bodybuilder and it fits my size perfectly and everywhere I go someone mentions the watch.so if you want it to be noticed go rolex.i tried the deep sea on and found it a bit to big for my taste but a beautiful watch.
|
6 July 2012, 03:18 AM | #84 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
Not playing the race card but you get a different reaction when doing something that's not stereotypical. I get plenty of compliments about the cars I drive. I like the respect I get. People are shocked when they see a mid 20 year old with the mindset of knowing quality. I wear Louie and Gucci and fitted suits. I need a watch that goes with that. It appears a Rolex or Omega will fit my style. It seems their both watches that someone "uptown" will look and give you that nod or look of respect. That's what I'm about. I have confidence. But to say that a watch or other things you wear doesn't symbolize your confidence or that people who see you walking past won't look at you and judge you by, in this case the watch you wear is a lie, we all know that. With the right watch you could literally be a bum but someone sees the kind of watch you have on and they'll think twice about you. I feel a watch is the most essential part of your look. Rather it's a suit and tie or even hoop shorts with a fitted tee the watch you wear is more likely to define the person you are in someone else mind which may lead them to be more open to say something to you or approach you in a certain manner. Now to go along with one member said, I'm going for a day and night watch as well. Now plenty of you have said they feel I'm buying a watch for the wrong reasons or that the girls I'm looking for won't even notice the watch or brand is untrue. Now I said the reason for wanting the watch for night time wear is because like I said, I do like attention especially if I'm at the club. I give women plenty of credit in that they know a good watch from the swap shop watch. I get plenty of attention with ladies but I have seen straight losers (speaking cause I know them, not on appearance) get girls as well, but a lot have had a nice watch. I'm not saying I'd go to bed with any woman who notices my watch, I'm just saying I want to play mind games with women more. Make them think that cause they notice my watch I'm leaving with them. It's just an attention thing. I weed out the good from the bad on my own. This I know I will admit I originally was going with a DJ because I assumed that it was THE ROLEX but after joining these sites and reading through threads that the bling of the DJ wasn't it, It's the style and prestige of the Subs, DSSD, GMT that are the real Rolex. The style of them grew on me to wear a DJ doesn't even appear in the equation anymore. The Omega PO is. And I like them equally. I'm just trying to get as much insight on these watches as possible before I make a choice which is why I stated my reasoning for wanting a watch. But a good watch is the most essential piece of a man's daily wear. I'm just trying to decide if Rolex Sub, DSSD (sorry DJ) are the way to go, or should I go Omega PO. |
|
6 July 2012, 03:33 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
i am doing this wrong... selling all of my watches for Rolex-es
|
6 July 2012, 03:37 AM | #86 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex and Omega
Posts: 564
|
How about an Omega Seamaster Pro and a Rolex GMT?
My first nice watch was a SMP 2254.50. I've always wanted a Rolex and so I went straight to the Sub because it was what I perceived as the "standard" sport Rolex. I was just never quite happy with the 16610 (never owned a Sub-C) and I always thought there was too much duplication between my SMP and the sub. I finally decided that for me, the best combo is the 2254.50 and a Rolex GMT IIc. Now I have a very nice dive watch and an iconic GMT watch without having "duplication" in my collection. The PO is also a great watch, especially the new 8500 version. If you want to save a few bucks, that might be a great option.
__________________
Regards, Steve |
6 July 2012, 04:03 AM | #87 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Ari
Location: Florida
Watch: ...me go broke
Posts: 2,428
|
Quote:
It sounds like you're going for a classy look. Unfortunately it seems like what you're actually looking like, is arrogant, immature, low self esteem (masquerading as confidence), and in general, un-classy. True class goes hand in hand with humility and kindness, traits you're perhaps hiding very well from us. :) A classy person treats others with respect, whether they're wearing a Rolex or a Timex. A person who has class doesn't really care what watch another person wears, because he's interested in assessing the quality of the person, not his stuff. You're trying rather desperately to impress with "stuff", which is a telltale sign deep down you feel it's all you have that's impressive. Trust me, there's more to you than your stuff, in fact your stuff has almost nothing to do with who you are or what you have to offer. These are things you'll hopefully learn as you get a little older. I also have some bad news, very few normal people will know what your watch is, let alone judge you by it, those who do aren't people you should want to be with. Some extremely smart and successful people wear a $50 watch, and conversely, many wear a nice watch, or drive a flashy car while they're drowning in debt. Appearances are just that, appearances. There's a word for judging people based on appearances and not substance. But, I wouldn't worry too much about all this, in 20 years you'll look back at how silly it all was, trying to impress or control people with material things. And if not, then you weren't paying attention for those 20 years. |
|
6 July 2012, 04:15 AM | #88 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
|
|
6 July 2012, 04:25 AM | #89 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Not Mars
Posts: 1,004
|
Quote:
|
|
6 July 2012, 04:52 AM | #90 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.