ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rags · 20 September 2012, 07:18 PM

It would be a DJ for me.

penfold · 20 September 2012, 07:38 PM

For me it'd be the Hulk. I owned a 14060M and it played second fiddle to my SD. Not a fan of nato's and the bracelet felt so cheap compared to it's modern contemporaries. The LV is just a much better quality although styling and colour may not be for everyone. I love mine although I do wear in rotation with other watches.

vette boy 52 · 20 September 2012, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masterserg

deepsea. I don't think i'd need another and i have no problems wearing it anywhere i might be at.

x2

Jsan20 · 20 September 2012, 11:51 PM

If times were tough I would keep the hulk and sell the rest. I would probably pick up a second job before I did that.

Steven79 · 21 September 2012, 12:03 AM

114060. the "NEW" SubC no date.

caryyee · 21 September 2012, 12:49 AM

The Hulk is a great 2nd watch ... but as an only watch, it's not as versatile as the 14060 due to it's green dial. The 14060 doesn't have a date though. What I'd consider doing is selling both and getting a Sub C date.

Gator08 · 21 September 2012, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJL

It's tough between those two - but I'd chose the 14060 and here's why.

I like the hulk, but I personally don't see it as a one and only piece simply because of it's coloring. It's not the most versatile color and does not go with everything. I think it's a great companion watch though.

Out of all the watches, if I were to choose and one and only, it would be a Yacht-Master, SD4000 or Pepsi GMT Master II (with additional LN insert). In my opinion, any of those watches are perfect for one and only's.

Good luck!

This!

rolio · 21 September 2012, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJL

It's tough between those two - but I'd chose the 14060 and here's why.

I like the hulk, but I personally don't see it as a one and only piece simply because of it's coloring. It's not the most versatile color and does not go with everything. I think it's a great companion watch though.

Out of all the watches, if I were to choose and one and only, it would be a Yacht-Master, SD4000 or Pepsi GMT Master II (with additional LN insert). In my opinion, any of those watches are perfect for one and only's.

Good luck!

I agree

20 September 2012, 07:18 PM	#61
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	It would be a DJ for me. __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

20 September 2012, 07:38 PM	#62
penfold "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: UK Posts: 107	For me it'd be the Hulk. I owned a 14060M and it played second fiddle to my SD. Not a fan of nato's and the bracelet felt so cheap compared to it's modern contemporaries. The LV is just a much better quality although styling and colour may not be for everyone. I love mine although I do wear in rotation with other watches.

20 September 2012, 11:51 PM	#64
Jsan20 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: James Location: Michigan Watch: 116613LB Posts: 861	If times were tough I would keep the hulk and sell the rest. I would probably pick up a second job before I did that.

21 September 2012, 12:03 AM	#65
Steven79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Steven Location: Houston Watch: Sub Posts: 1,175	114060. the "NEW" SubC no date.

21 September 2012, 12:49 AM	#66
caryyee "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: A Location: Austin, TX Posts: 2,180	The Hulk is a great 2nd watch ... but as an only watch, it's not as versatile as the 14060 due to it's green dial. The 14060 doesn't have a date though. What I'd consider doing is selling both and getting a Sub C date.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)