The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 July 2014, 02:26 AM   #61
jlc123
"TRF" Member
 
jlc123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. I was shocked by the size and found it somehow uninspiring.
jlc123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 02:57 AM   #62
watchstudent
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SW England
Watch: Sub and a Speedy
Posts: 368
This happened to me when I tried on the SubC vs the Seamaster Pro 300m Ceramic. SubC just isn't for me.

Another is the Omega Aqua Terra, looks great in pics and i think i love the teak dial and all the white gold markers but then in person i think the dial looks cluttered and untidy, much prefer the datejust or oyster perpetual in that genre.
watchstudent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 02:57 AM   #63
aaamax
"TRF" Member
 
aaamax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sweden of yore
Posts: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by flagada2009 View Post
The same could be said about online dating...>!!

She said she was model....I didn't realize she was a model of a large watery mammal...


....hmmm...I feel guilty writing that yet...can't get myself to remove it....
I lost part of my drink out the nose with this! Lol.
aaamax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 03:01 AM   #64
Time Exposure
"TRF" Member
 
Time Exposure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
Saw pictures of a red gold Daytona and bracelet with a chocolate dial. Wow!
Saw it at the AD in the showcase. OMG!
Tried it on and realized how pink my skin tone is, and decided it kinda washed out on my arm.
Bought a Nautilus instead. Traded that for a white gold Calatrava. I wonder what's next...Platona?!??
Time Exposure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 03:17 AM   #65
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
Yes, this has happened quite a few times. Both ways. Some watches I thought were beautiful in pics disappointed in person, and the opposite has happened as well.

Always pays to check out the watch model you are buying in person first, IMHO.

A great place to do that is the Rolex flagship store on 5th Avenue in NYC, if you have the chance. As wide a selection as you will find in the US. Of course, AD's also work, but I haven't found any with as wide a selection on hand as the NY store for a chance to compare models in person.

I try to visit annually to refresh my memory in comparison of models, whether I am planning on buying or not.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 03:35 AM   #66
bardm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bård
Location: Oslo - Norway
Watch: None
Posts: 1,014
Yes. Had looked at the photos here of the GMT IIc YG, and loved it. Tried it on the wrist at my AD and it was so, - well -, damn yellow!

Maybe it was the lightning at the AD.

Tried a DD II YG and did't like that either. RG DD was very nice though. Must be either my skin tone or the lightning.

They both look so amazing on the photos here
__________________
Bård
bardm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 03:39 AM   #67
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
The last was the hulk. My AD had one used (mint) last week going for 6.5k with complete set. The previous owner had small wrists like me so I was able to walk around with it, far from the "ad light" and was not ok with so much green going on. But in pics it's a killer watch that I always had my eyes on.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:33 AM   #68
bighaole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Exp II + Daytona
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjm800 View Post
I'll take flak for this...but, the Hulk looked so amazing in the prerelease photos and when I saw it, it was just OK to me.
+1. I was interested in the hulk from pictures, but in person, at an AD, it was just too much, for me.
bighaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:49 AM   #69
jcd
"TRF" Member
 
jcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Jack
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: me vector
Posts: 1,152
For me, It was pretty much any Panerai. When I tried on a PAM88, which I'd been drooling over in pics for ages, it just looked too huge on my wrist. Oh well, I'll stick to admiring them from afar.
jcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:52 AM   #70
Byrnedogs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 31
Interesting that a lot of people prefer the BLNR in pics. Im personally not a huge fan of the pics but was blown away when I saw it in person and had a walk around with it on my wrist!
Byrnedogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:53 AM   #71
1995akcoop
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
gotta be the BLNR for. i couldnt wait to purchase one until i tried it on. The blue was dull to me. its a shame you have to but under good lighting for the blue to really pop


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1995akcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:55 AM   #72
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,973
DJ fluted bezel, silver dials and batons

Absolutely adore this watch in the photos, super jubilee is stunning and the baton dial looks beautifully simple.

On my wrist, at the time in a t-shirt and jeans under shop lights it looks very sparkly, small and not as nice as I thought it would.

That aside I bought it because my heart says I love it, looks great dressed up and to me a classic rolex.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:56 AM   #73
Joearch
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,852
Same here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrnedogs View Post
Interesting that a lot of people prefer the BLNR in pics. Im personally not a huge fan of the pics but was blown away when I saw it in person and had a walk around with it on my wrist!
I liked it in photos, but really like how dynamic it is in person. Most YG gold look a bit too much for me in person. Maybe a DD will be in my future but to much $$$$
Joearch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:20 AM   #74
usmc93
"TRF" Member
 
usmc93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Brent
Location: Huntsvegas, AL
Watch: SS/Black Daytona
Posts: 1,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Bolan View Post
What happened to me was I was amazed by the BLNR in many of the beautiful pics here on the forum...I went to AD and was ready to try on the BATMAN! When handed, I actually thought I was looking at the wrong watch...
Agreed, had the same thing happen to me with the BLNR. Had the opposite happen to me with the Explorer II, I liked the Polar one better in pics, until I saw the Black one side by side at the AD, to me it was not competition, Black blew it out of the water.
__________________
"Some people live an entire lifetime and wonder if they have made a difference in the world. Marines don't have that problem." - Ronald Reagan

--Rolex 116610LV, Rolex 116710LN BLNR, Bremont MBII, Rolex 216570, Omega Speedmaster 3572.50, Zenith Class Elite 680, 1993 Tag Heuer 2000 Chrono--
usmc93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 06:20 AM   #75
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
I have had the Sky-dweller do the opposite. Pictures were just OK, but then I tried one on.....Stunning
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 07:02 AM   #76
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annan View Post
Have to admit I was a little less thrilled with the GMTIIC LN and BLNR in person than I expected. Both are beautiful watches, I would be OK with owning either, both sang to me but just not loudly. I had the completely opposite experience, however when I first saw the EXPII 216570 in person. Once again, all a matter of personal preference and taste.

I agree, I could never get over the shiny unpractical PCL and the flashy bezel of theGMT. My next watch will be a white explorer with brushed links. I have an lvc and a black SS Daytona


Nidal
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 07:09 AM   #77
StaceeJaxx
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Just Fly Casual
Posts: 698
116718 Green
StaceeJaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 07:13 AM   #78
sportsmaven20
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sportsmaven20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Randy
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,925
SD4000...I really liked the tapered lugs, however the bezel was just too busy and the end links protruding above the lugs was very unappealing to me.
sportsmaven20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 08:12 AM   #79
Charles1977
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Charles
Location: Mass
Watch: Daytona 116300
Posts: 126
I really thought I would like the 216570 cause I loved the pics then when I went to the ad and saw them I was immediately turned off.Just not for me.
Charles1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 09:00 AM   #80
KINGROLESAR
"TRF" Member
 
KINGROLESAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Drew
Location: PHILADELPHIA
Watch: CROWN MARKED
Posts: 2,158
Very common. We all stare at these perfect pictures every detail is blown up and artfully shot. A good reverse example is the Milgauss and its Lightning Bolt Hand that so many are concerned about. When on the wrist a minor feature if you love the glass IMO you make a big mistake by passing it up exclusively due to that hand.
__________________
"Raise your glass high, those here for those not with but a sigh; for enjoy each day, it comes but once, then quickly to the past as it must" - King Rolesar 03
KINGROLESAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 09:01 AM   #81
luvsub
2024 Pledge Member
 
luvsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
I may have to say LVC. Even though I love subs.
luvsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 02:50 PM   #82
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by KINGROLESAR View Post
Very common. We all stare at these perfect pictures every detail is blown up and artfully shot. A good reverse example is the Milgauss and its Lightning Bolt Hand that so many are concerned about. When on the wrist a minor feature if you love the glass IMO you make a big mistake by passing it up exclusively due to that hand.
That's a great point. I think it's the same with the writing on the ring lock on the DSSD. In photos it's very prominent and turns people off, but on the wrist you don't even notice it.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 03:31 PM   #83
Vishy26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
I was underwhelmed as I tried on 116613LB at the local AD. I thought it would be fantastic but the blue became too much for me. May be, if I had it on for a week I would have liked it, never would know that.
Vishy26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:31 PM   #84
leicashot
"TRF" Member
 
leicashot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Watch: SEIKO SLA033
Posts: 665
For me, definitely the BLNR. I really wanted to love it but wasn't feeling it. Maybe its one of those watches that 'needs' to be seen in natural light but to me the blue was too 'purplish-blue' than I expected.

leicashot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:38 PM   #85
Stan_sg
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 32
Yes the 116613LB "smurf" dial...it fell flat for me.
Stan_sg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 04:54 PM   #86
Flex368
"TRF" Member
 
Flex368's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaceeJaxx View Post
116718 Green
Same here. It´s one of the most beautiful watches around - at least on pictures. When I tried it on at the AD I was very disappointed.

When I see all the votes for the green dial on the other thread I wonder how many actually tried it on themselves?
Flex368 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:19 PM   #87
style88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byrnedogs View Post
Interesting that a lot of people prefer the BLNR in pics. Im personally not a huge fan of the pics but was blown away when I saw it in person and had a walk around with it on my wrist!
I was underwhelmed as well the first time I saw the BLNR in person. But it was the first watch that make me consider Rolex, so I thought what the heck, just buy it.

The more I wear it then, the more I start liking it. After 4 months, it's hard not to pick up this watch as my daily wear. It goes very well with business clothes, it's pretty bling, and I haven't seen anyone else wearing this watch. And it's often a conversational piece with friends, bosses and ADs.

Opposite for me is the YM Blue. It didn't do very much for me on pics, but when I saw it at the AD, I was blown away. It's simply gorgeous.
style88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:38 PM   #88
lipjin
"TRF" Member
 
lipjin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: HK
Watch: AP ROC, Nautilus
Posts: 1,657
The 116515 was a huge disappointment for me in the flesh. Kept wanting to get it for months and then when I decided to pull the trigger, it just didn't click for me when on the wrist. I bought a Patek instead :p
__________________
"We must use time wisely and forever realize that the time is always ripe to do right" -Nelson Mandela

"It is not our abilities that show what we truly are. It is our choices" -Dumbledore

Instagram: horolj_
lipjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:46 PM   #89
bighaole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Exp II + Daytona
Posts: 452
I have to add the Daytona to this list, even though I own one and love it. But, the fact remains, by the time I could afford to buy one, my eyes got so old I couldn't easily read the sub dials!
bighaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 July 2014, 05:46 PM   #90
drfaulkner
"TRF" Member
 
drfaulkner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Malaysia
Watch: Expl II, TT DJII
Posts: 420
after researching on the internet, I was fully ready to pull the trigger on a JLC master Ultra Thin....until I saw it in person.
drfaulkner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.