ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Sam Philip · 14 June 2014, 11:14 AM

I wouldn't sell a Sub for that

The_Walrus · 14 June 2014, 11:17 AM

I don't think you posted your question in the correct forum.
A slight bias for one over the other.
I too vote for the sub

Rolextraderflorida · 14 June 2014, 12:05 PM

I wouldn't even consider that.

CWIN · 14 June 2014, 12:13 PM

Save for the PO and keep the sub.

JayAK · 15 June 2014, 03:41 AM

No

roklee · 15 June 2014, 03:52 AM

Nope.

Ector495 · 15 June 2014, 04:30 AM

How dare you!

JK, obviously I would not. But, it's your wrist, you have to do what calls to you.

dcl84 · 15 June 2014, 04:39 AM

rolex > omega IMHO

HogwldFLTR · 15 June 2014, 04:48 AM

Surely you jest trading a venerable Sub for a flash in the pan PO. I guess one must follow their heart.

never2late · 15 June 2014, 04:58 AM

That PO is beautiful and I'd like to own one but not at the expense of losing a sub.

fabio1965 · 15 June 2014, 05:01 AM

Keep the Sub!

GermanyMatt · 15 June 2014, 05:02 AM

It's a Rolex forum. What do you expect?

Gerardus · 15 June 2014, 05:55 AM

Never.

adamlea · 15 June 2014, 05:57 AM

Um, no. Bad idea.

submariner123 · 15 June 2014, 06:03 AM

Nein!!

venom43 · 15 June 2014, 06:32 AM

No.....just save up for one.

Rashid.bk · 15 June 2014, 07:51 AM

It is a nice watch and lots of value. Per the stats, it is the clear winner, but there's more to it.
I'd keep the Submariner if it's a ceramic model.

roklee · 16 June 2014, 07:46 AM

No way.

Charliedog001 · 16 June 2014, 07:55 AM

It not the same though is it

luvsub · 16 June 2014, 08:09 AM

I will keep Sub.

Dr DRW · 16 June 2014, 10:41 AM

sub all the way, I've bnever had a stainless rolex lose value , doubt you could say that with most other watches including even patek
but if theres an Omega forum somewhere they might think differently

Brucie D · 16 June 2014, 10:54 AM

Um... sell a Rolex Submariner to get an Omega? I suppose James Bond sold out...

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

aeon888 · 16 June 2014, 11:11 AM

I'll say Sub C, afterall this is the rolexforums. If you want a different answer, try asking the same question to the omega forums.

Pattyb69 · 16 June 2014, 01:48 PM

I never really considered selling my Sub C. I love it too much and still find myself mesmerized by it multiple times a day. The PO GMT would just be a nice piece to add into the rotation. That or the PAM 233. Looks like I got some saving to do.

Perrinyanna · 16 June 2014, 02:10 PM

Keep the sub C u will not regret it 20 years or more from now

alubin · 16 June 2014, 03:13 PM

Please don't

DreambreaX · 16 June 2014, 04:39 PM

nope

bayerische · 16 June 2014, 06:08 PM

If you like it, then do it.

Tombstone · 16 June 2014, 06:21 PM

Pick the PO up on the gray market and keep your sub.

masterkiller · 16 June 2014, 06:26 PM

Love it, but love the SubC alot more...

14 June 2014, 12:13 PM	#64
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	Save for the PO and keep the sub. __________________ *Instagram* @cwin

15 June 2014, 04:30 AM	#67
Ector495 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: North Carolina Watch: 16622 Posts: 1,097	How dare you! JK, obviously I would not. But, it's your wrist, you have to do what calls to you. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear. - Ambrose Redmoon

15 June 2014, 04:48 AM	#69
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,695	Surely you jest trading a venerable Sub for a flash in the pan PO. I guess one must follow their heart. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

15 June 2014, 04:58 AM	#70
never2late "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Jerry Location: Cleveland, Ohio Watch: 116610LN Posts: 827	That PO is beautiful and I'd like to own one but not at the expense of losing a sub. __________________ "You, you and you, panic . . . the rest of you follow me!" Unknown Gunnery Sergeant, Vietnam 1966. Rolex, Sub 126610LN Omega Seamaster 300M Diver, Doxa Sub 200 Tudor Black Bay Bronze, Tudor Pelagos, (Blue).

15 June 2014, 05:55 AM	#73
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	Never. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

14 June 2014, 11:14 AM	#61
Sam Philip Banned Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: UK Posts: 4,345	I wouldn't sell a Sub for that

14 June 2014, 11:17 AM	#62
The_Walrus "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Real Name: George Location: Sydney Watch: 5513 Posts: 1,104	I don't think you posted your question in the correct forum. A slight bias for one over the other. I too vote for the sub

14 June 2014, 12:05 PM	#63
Rolextraderflorida "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Real Name: Brett Location: Florida Watch: 228238 Posts: 1,408	I wouldn't even consider that.

15 June 2014, 03:41 AM	#65
JayAK "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Watch: 116618LN Posts: 609	No

15 June 2014, 03:52 AM	#66
roklee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: canada Watch: rolex explorer ii Posts: 493	Nope.

15 June 2014, 04:39 AM	#68
dcl84 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: world Posts: 14	rolex > omega IMHO

15 June 2014, 05:01 AM	#71
fabio1965 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Milano Posts: 120	Keep the Sub!

15 June 2014, 05:02 AM	#72
GermanyMatt "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Matt Location: Northern VA Watch: 126711, 126610 Posts: 1,803	It's a Rolex forum. What do you expect?

15 June 2014, 05:57 AM	#74
adamlea "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Great Plains Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk Posts: 1,190	Um, no. Bad idea.

15 June 2014, 06:03 AM	#75
submariner123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Thomas Location: England Watch: 116610LN Posts: 643	Nein!!

15 June 2014, 06:32 AM	#76
venom43 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: NOR-CAL Watch: Grail Daytona Posts: 1,306	No.....just save up for one. __________________ ROLEX:(116200)SS DATEJUST,(216570)SS EXPLORER II "POLAR",(116518-0073)YG DAYTONA,(116718)YG GMT MASTER IIc,(16610)SS SUBMARINER 50th LV,(16623)TT YACHT-MASTER ~BREITLING:SUPER OCEAN 44 ~JLC:NAVY SEALs ~OMEGA:PLANET OCEAN "LIQUIDMETAL LE" & (2201.51),SPEEEDMASTER PRO "METEORITE DIAL",SEAMASTER PRO GMT "GREAT WHITE" ~TUDOR:BLACK BAY(R)

15 June 2014, 07:51 AM	#77
Rashid.bk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas Watch: 12800ft = 3900m Posts: 11,173	It is a nice watch and lots of value. Per the stats, it is the clear winner, but there's more to it. I'd keep the Submariner if it's a ceramic model.

16 June 2014, 07:46 AM	#78
roklee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: canada Watch: rolex explorer ii Posts: 493	No way.

16 June 2014, 07:55 AM	#79
Charliedog001 Banned Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Florida Posts: 29	It not the same though is it

16 June 2014, 08:09 AM	#80
luvsub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: SF, south bay Posts: 5,222	I will keep Sub.

16 June 2014, 10:41 AM	#81
Dr DRW "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: David Location: Dallas, Tx Watch: Divers Posts: 323	sub all the way, I've bnever had a stainless rolex lose value , doubt you could say that with most other watches including even patek but if theres an Omega forum somewhere they might think differently __________________ Rolex 1665, 1675, 1680, 5513, 16600, 16610, 14060

16 June 2014, 10:54 AM	#82
Brucie D "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Bruce Location: Saskatoon SK CAN Watch: DJ / BLNR / SUBCLV Posts: 1,381	Um... sell a Rolex Submariner to get an Omega? I suppose James Bond sold out... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

16 June 2014, 11:11 AM	#83
aeon888 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Midwest Posts: 746	I'll say Sub C, afterall this is the rolexforums. If you want a different answer, try asking the same question to the omega forums.

16 June 2014, 01:48 PM	#84
Pattyb69 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: CT Watch: BLNR\|LVC\|PAM 911 Posts: 1,085	I never really considered selling my Sub C. I love it too much and still find myself mesmerized by it multiple times a day. The PO GMT would just be a nice piece to add into the rotation. That or the PAM 233. Looks like I got some saving to do.

16 June 2014, 02:10 PM	#85
Perrinyanna "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Philippines Posts: 262	Keep the sub C u will not regret it 20 years or more from now

16 June 2014, 03:13 PM	#86
alubin "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: USA Watch: All please! Posts: 1,042	Please don't

16 June 2014, 04:39 PM	#87
DreambreaX Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Rolex Estate Posts: 1,304	nope

16 June 2014, 06:08 PM	#88
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	If you like it, then do it. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

16 June 2014, 06:21 PM	#89
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	Pick the PO up on the gray market and keep your sub. __________________ Always working...by choice

16 June 2014, 06:26 PM	#90
masterkiller "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Sweden Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM... Posts: 1,403	Love it, but love the SubC alot more... __________________ Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)