The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 August 2014, 02:11 AM   #61
EEParker
"TRF" Member
 
EEParker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Parker
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 337
I don't mind that people think they are so expensive. Means they are less likely to try and buy one, so the chance of me seeing the same watch on someones wrist goes down just a bit.
EEParker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 02:48 AM   #62
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
£2k is what most people think my subc cost. I usually say close, not treble.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 02:52 AM   #63
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolexPrince View Post
I definitely agree that the stigma with Rolex is that they are REALLY expensive.
Well to most people, the idea of spending $5,000+ for a watch made of steel is REALLY expensive. My step-father, who owns one of those gold coin, solid gold watches, things I'm insane to spend what I did on a steel watch.

Now I think his watch is gawdy as hell and most likely isn't worth more than the value of the gold it's made out of, but he does have a point. Rolex watches cost what they do because WE are willing to pay that price - not because they are really "worth" that much in terms of materials or cost to build
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 03:00 AM   #64
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
I think if there was a number it would be $5,000. And I have a friend that says he likes nothing but the best, can't/won't spend over $500 on a watch. There are a lot of good watches under $500 depending on your needs. G-shock, ecozilla, Hamilton, some shinola etc. in the end it is all a matter of value in the eye of the beholder (of the cash).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 03:13 AM   #65
vman
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
Why would you care?
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 03:16 AM   #66
steptoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london, uk.
Posts: 250
Lets be honest.......it's not much different from the average man estimating the cost of a wifes new handbag, you ask and she replies "£75/$100", and you think, "jesus, how much".

And your wife thinks, "phew, i got away with that one, he'd explode if he knew the real price"..
__________________
Rolex 1665 DRSD
Rolex 1680 Red sub.
steptoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 06:39 AM   #67
MrTito
"TRF" Member
 
MrTito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Watch: BLNR, JLC Deep Sea
Posts: 164
I work for a head-hunting firm (which makes it almost sound glamorous). I would guesstimate I 'interview' maybe a couple of hundred exec level guys and gals each year in the UK and Europe and have done for the last ten years. I have some lovely watches that I'm very proud of and certainly don't make any real effort to hide. In all that time and with all those people only two have ever commented on a watch (both times it was a Pam). Really, truthfully, I think we love our watches and frankly 90% of society couldn't care less!

All this talk of perceived value... really?... I'd love to have a chat with someone who shares my interest (that's why I'm here), the only people I'm aware of who look at a guys wrist and assess a value are thieves and Thai hookers.

I've fortunately avoided one and am yet to meet the other
MrTito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 06:52 AM   #68
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus49 View Post
I'm drawing up the papers now and sending them to fellow TRF member Headshrinker. Any asylum preferences?
All of them please and quick as I am eyeing up the RG version of that PP
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 09:10 AM   #69
rfknauss
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
rfknauss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Richard
Location: Macungie, PA
Watch: 5513 Sub, LV Sub
Posts: 14,497
I have found that the best way to answer the question when someone asks you how much your Rolex costs is to say ...... a lot less than the really expensive watch brands.
__________________


"Few things in life give man as great a pleasure as wearing a Rolex!"

TRF's "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron
rfknauss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 09:44 AM   #70
scrappy
"TRF" Member
 
scrappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
All of them please and quick as I am eyeing up the RG version of that PP

Dooooo it!
scrappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 09:55 AM   #71
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
My 20 year old Sub is worth more than I paid for it, so if I was wearing that watch and got asked the question, at this point I suppose my answer would be "It was free."

Interestingly, since Rolex designs are so consistent over the years a person could ask one guy how much his Sub was and be told $2,000 while the next guy could tell him almost $10,000. The average person would think the 2nd guy got screwed on the same watch.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 10:04 AM   #72
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrappy View Post
Dooooo it!
OK, checking in right now...
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 03:51 PM   #73
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
I think people generally have no idea how many different Rolex models there are, the variation within model ranges, and the fact that there is a huge second-hand market where prices vary enormously.
I do think that a lot of people may not like the idea of buying a piece of very personal 'jewellery' second-hand, whereas it's not an issue for WIS.
I think most of my friends would say A$10K as the likely cost of "a Rolex".
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 05:39 PM   #74
jctrolex
"TRF" Member
 
jctrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Watch: 1675
Posts: 1,163
I was once at a camera store and the sales guy looked at my TT GMT and said "Wow a Rolex, knowing you it must a real one. I bet that must have cost over a thousand bucks!"
I said you are close.
jctrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 05:43 PM   #75
Showcall
"TRF" Member
 
Showcall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Australia
Watch: SS Skydweller
Posts: 659
Rolex Prices

In Australia most people assume they are fake's from Thailand? unless they are in the Know!
Showcall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2014, 06:04 PM   #76
Nobody.Move
"TRF" Member
 
Nobody.Move's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 266
We live in a world of knock-offs...fake luxury goods are the norm. Even if one isn't wearing a garish, blingy-style type Rolex, a tool watch let's say, the common assumption is that it's a fake simply because it says, "Rolex." People are more prone to believe in the simulation (fake/knockoff) than the real (authentic Rolex). Blame it on Jean Baudrillard!
Nobody.Move is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.