If you had to sell one... New Sub or Tudor Vintage.

[osamu]

Wow nice snowflake. I understand if it's not seeing wrist time, or if you're just looking to downsize to just something you can wear daily, maybe I could see it on the block.... But I have to agree with most people here... The snowflake looks great and would be much harder to replace.

[Mr. K]

Originally Posted by Submariner2015

It really depends on what you hold more dear and whether you are keeping for value. The sub looks cleaner, has a more upgraded and modern movement, bezel and bracelet while the Tudor is more vintage and may have sentimental value...as others have said, if you're going to possibly have sellers remorse down the road then sell the Sub; otherwise I'd keep the Sub :)

Agreed, do what you feel is right. I would keep the sub, it is to me a great watch.

But if you think you will rebuy later, then everyone is correct, keep the Tudor. But if you were going to rebuy the sub or the Tudor in the future, I'd keep both.

I have yet to rebuy the same watch. I've gone through 30-40 watches. Many were Rolex. Never re-bought, the same model, when I was done, ready to sell, there was no looking back for me. I have bought back many of the same models, SMP when it went ceramic, subs when they went ceramic, DJs with the newer bracelets, but to me they were different watches.

I'll tell you a couple watches I do miss are my UN MMCs and the Cartier Roadster, but always looking forward and never back.

Follow your gut instinct.

[sgmgolf]

Originally Posted by travisb

Snowflake stays without a doubt!
The Sub can be easily replaced if and when that time comes.

This ^^^^^^...........X2.

I also have a Tudor Blue Snowflake Sub 9411/0.....they are becoming quite rare to find in nice condition.

[Blackdog]

Modern Subs are everywhere. Snowflakes in good shape nare not. Keep the vintage Tudor.

[Abdullasaif]

Sub


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Superlativo]

Keep the Snowflake.

[dysondiver]

yep , another keep the tudor.

[mui.richard]

Keep the Tudor, the SubC can be easily replaced.

Sent from my SGP771 using Tapatalk

[Racerdj]

My advise and what I do is to send the least worn and least enjoyed piece to a new owner. The reason I included the least enjoyed, is my 5070 is not worn very much but when I do, it is really enjoyed. My prior Lange was a beautiful piece with a stunning dial, but I just could not bond with it.

[nick c]

Tudor snowflake they are a keeper

[Brisman]

Thanks for all the input guys, I've decided to keep the SF. 👍

[JohnAndrew]

Keep the snowflake.
Great looking watch!

[lsettle]

Great to hear that you will keep the SF!

Lawrence

[1995akcoop]

keep the sub!!! not a tudor fan at all


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NYCREBROKER]

What made you come to that decision?

[eco8gator]

Smart choice and in my opinion a much cooler watch.

[vette boy 52]

Sell the Rolex Sub it is much easier to replace.

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by Brisman

Thanks for all the input guys, I've decided to keep the SF. ��

Great choice! Looks great; now you've got me looking at them!!!

[Brisman]

Originally Posted by NYCREBROKER

What made you come to that decision?

I think it was the fact, as many said, I can easily buy a Sub C again, but the SF would be hard to source.

[ncstate1201]

Bah keep whichever you like more...I have had many tudor subs including a minty blue sf...I sold it...it just wasn't that versatile in my opinion. Plus I liked the no date version better. I would keep the sub c...but then again I tire of my watches and sell them.. sub c is the latest flavor for me

[AK797]

Originally Posted by Brisman

I think it was the fact, as many said, I can easily buy a Sub C again, but the SF would be hard to source.

[SLS]

Great choice! And if you decide to get the Sub again, they are easily found!