The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 October 2016, 04:21 PM   #61
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeTee View Post
I wouldn't go that far. Cosmetically it makes it look a lot nicer and more modern. Sometimes you have to pay to play.
The Luddites will always be critical of anything regarding new technology.

On many occasions I have barked my Ceramic bezel on the DSSD up against and along things that would've very seriously damaged any Aluminum bezel possibly triggering a replacement.
I can state categorically that there is absolutely no visible damage to the Ceramic insert itself
In contrast the SS bezel is certainly showing a few minor battle scars as a result

As with everything there are advantages and disadvantages.
For now, on balance I'll personally take a Ceramic bezel over an Aluminum one based on my experience.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 04:24 PM   #62
Bruins7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: LA
Watch: Rolex(4),15400
Posts: 1,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
Wearing this in the meantime. Not a Rolex... but definitely this bezel won't crack


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nice rimowa luggage in the back, I have the same one
Bruins7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 04:28 PM   #63
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
I think there is a premium to the Pepsi bezel. If a $9k watch has a $750 bezel cost. It's a deal when a $37k watch has a $1200 bezel cost.

Thanks everyone for their comments. It just sucks because the watch is only 2 weeks old and now it's gone for months. It is what it is, things can always be worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I had a similar experience with my first Rolex watch.
After purchasing it second hand I immediately sent it in for a full service and as expected it came back like a new watch.
Not long afterward I dropped it onto the concrete workshop floor causing a lot of damage and heartache.

Thanks for taking the time to show us the result of the accident
I assume there is another piece missing from the pics which is still firmly attached to the bezel?
It's also notable the strength of the individual broken pieces
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 04:58 PM   #64
BawlaDK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Morten
Location: Denmark
Watch: 16800 Submariner
Posts: 265
Ouch ouch ouch... I feel so bad for you. This has got to suck....

But this is the main reason I wont touch the ceramic Rolexes at all.... To me the ceramic unfortunately aint no improvement at all
BawlaDK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 05:20 PM   #65
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
I hit my hand into a door handle pretty hard and it cracked and just spilled on the ground. It must have caught it just right. RSC inspected the bezel to see if that was damaged as they said if it is the ceramic insert will not fit back in right. Luckily the bezel was fine. The impact was strictly on the ceramic. The crystal was fine.

$1200 to replace insert. If I needed to change the bezel the cost would have been an additional $4,000 (half the cost of a submariner) lol

What kills me is the time. Bezel has to come from Geneva. They get their shipments once per month. So they will place the order and hope it comes in beginning of November. The gal told me it likely won't and the last Pepsi bezel that broke took them 3 months to get.

Oh ya, watch is 2 weeks old. What can you do but just chuckle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Very sorry this has happened to your new watch,but like most things hit it hard enough it will break.IMHO the $1200 cost just to replace the insert is a crazy price. And IMHO there should be some sort of warning in the Rolex literature about how ceramic can shatter.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 05:31 PM   #66
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
The Luddites will always be critical of anything regarding new technology.

On many occasions I have barked my Ceramic bezel on the DSSD up against and along things that would've very seriously damaged any Aluminum bezel possibly triggering a replacement.
I can state categorically that there is absolutely no visible damage to the Ceramic insert itself
In contrast the SS bezel is certai ceramic in watchesnly showing a few minor battle scars as a result

As with everything there are advantages and disadvantages.
For now, on balance I'll personally take a Ceramic bezel over an Aluminum one based on my experience.
First its not new technology ceramic in watches have been around since the 1960s. And yes the aluminum ones can scratch so can the ceramic, but from experience and using my own 1990s SD for many years as a working tool .Yet only one replacement insert cost then just £27 and a DIY fit even then it was not really badly scratched.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 05:41 PM   #67
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
.... ....I'll stick with my 16710. A lifetime supply of shiny new inserts would cost less.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 06:06 PM   #68
Amiricanmade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: NONYA
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: Many
Posts: 252
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
I think there is a premium to the Pepsi bezel. If a $9k watch has a $750 bezel cost. It's a deal when a $37k watch has a $1200 bezel cost.

Thanks everyone for their comments. It just sucks because the watch is only 2 weeks old and now it's gone for months. It is what it is, things can always be worse.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Things CAN always be worse man.
Amiricanmade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 06:21 PM   #69
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttnpb View Post
For that price I would seriously consider aftermarket insert replacement.
LOL. On a white gold GMT for close to 40K retail?
SURE.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 06:45 PM   #70
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Unlucky but worse things can happen, nice ap


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 07:03 PM   #71
Evad3
"TRF" Member
 
Evad3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Dave
Location: Portsmouth, UK
Watch: 14060m/216570
Posts: 773
Ouch sorry to see this, hope it doesn't take too long for the replacement to be produced.

Don't see many of these threads too often either and by the sounds of it the bezel took a pretty intense direct hit, if it wasn't the bezel it could have been the crystal.
__________________
Current: NOS 14060m , 216570 Polar
Previous: 116710BLNR, 114060, 2x NOS 14060m
Evad3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 07:26 PM   #72
heisse
"TRF" Member
 
heisse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: EU
Posts: 39
Sorry to hear that
The cost don't surprise me, the BLRO insert is a technical feat and has cost expensive in R&D (not to mention production losses).
That said, for a watch at +/- 40k$ retail ... old weeks ... charge 1200$ for an insert ... just lol this is not correct and commercial
just my 2 cents
delays seem ok
heisse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 07:27 PM   #73
Brunik
"TRF" Member
 
Brunik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Spain
Posts: 232
sorry to hear that...
Brunik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 07:30 PM   #74
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
I hit my hand into a door handle pretty hard and it cracked and just spilled on the ground. It must have caught it just right. RSC inspected the bezel to see if that was damaged as they said if it is the ceramic insert will not fit back in right. Luckily the bezel was fine. The impact was strictly on the ceramic. The crystal was fine.

$1200 to replace insert. If I needed to change the bezel the cost would have been an additional $4,000 (half the cost of a submariner) lol

What kills me is the time. Bezel has to come from Geneva. They get their shipments once per month. So they will place the order and hope it comes in beginning of November. The gal told me it likely won't and the last Pepsi bezel that broke took them 3 months to get.

Oh ya, watch is 2 weeks old. What can you do but just chuckle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 07:41 PM   #75
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,549
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
Sorry to hear of your misfortune, but I think your attitude toward the mishap is quite healthy.

Good luck on the replacement.
X2.
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 08:06 PM   #76
Roll the Lex
"TRF" Member
 
Roll the Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
Uh-oh... blro is my daily watch. Wonder if it is the blue/red insert itself. Or if it is just ceramic. Or something else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roll the Lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 08:14 PM   #77
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
It was $375 for an SS insert so $1200 still seems high, even tho it is in proportion to the watch prices.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Muzz View Post
It is a lot more brittle John!! I cracked mine on a seat belt I believe (can't say for certain). Never had an issue with any other ceramic insert before.

There has been an alarming amount of BLRO bezel inserts breaking!!

I think the RSC is being very optimistic on the time frame. They had mine for at least 5 months and broke 2 insert trying to repair it. The third insert worked.

Steve, was the price of your PepC insert similar?
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 11:13 PM   #78
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
First its not new technology ceramic in watches have been around since the 1960s. And yes the aluminum ones can scratch so can the ceramic, but from experience and using my own 1990s SD for many years as a working tool .Yet only one replacement insert cost then just £27 and a DIY fit even then it was not really badly scratched.
Certainly true enough.

If I recall correctly the last Aluminum bezel I replaced cost about $35.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 11:17 PM   #79
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,064
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roll the Lex View Post
Uh-oh... blro is my daily watch. Wonder if it is the blue/red insert itself. Or if it is just ceramic. Or something else.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's just the nature of this type of Ceramic.
Of course it doesn't help if you get unlucky as well
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2016, 11:59 PM   #80
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Given the replacement Ceramic bezels have previously been reportedly as priced at about the $750 mark, I wonder if the $1200 costing is to also allow for potential breakages in the replacement process
I'd bet it does. It also seems...if what I read around the internet is true...the insert was expensive to develop to begin with due to challenges with the red. Further, if only a smaller % make it onto a watch than the standard ceramics, I'd think any smart business would factor the lost insert costs into the ones that sell.

But all we can do is speculate.
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 12:09 AM   #81
Flstfirider
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Flstfirider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Auburn, AL
Watch: Rolex, Tudor
Posts: 1,139
Was that price quote from RUSA directly or through an AD working with RUSA? I sometimes wounded if AD's take advantage of customers and inflate service cost.
Flstfirider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 12:13 AM   #82
Colina19
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cooper City, FL
Posts: 158
I would not have expected to break by just hitting the door, I hit my watches all the time so I'm paranoid of getting the BLRO now (just kidding).
Colina19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 12:27 AM   #83
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312
5 months is a while ....
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 12:48 AM   #84
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Thank you for the post though. Rolex claims about the toughness of the ceramics are patent false advertising to generate more markup.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 12:56 AM   #85
Juantxo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Utopia
Posts: 2,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Very sorry this has happened to your new watch,but like most things hit it hard enough it will break.IMHO the $1200 cost just to replace the insert is a crazy price. And IMHO there should be some sort of warning in the Rolex literature about how ceramic can shatter.
The voice of reason.
Juantxo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 02:31 AM   #86
Jim Smyth
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Jim Smyth
Location: Florida
Watch: DD
Posts: 1,842
Wearing the AP should take the sting out of it..........
Jim Smyth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 02:36 AM   #87
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
makes sense, they make limited production of this watch. a blrn insert is probably cheaper.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 02:40 AM   #88
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884


this is worse.

some guy here cracked his black shield tudor pretty bad.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 02:49 AM   #89
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyMD View Post
Out of curiosity, how deep is the "blue" pigmentation? It doesn't appear to be all the way through the material. Can you take a close up of the broken edge of the blue part?
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 02:52 AM   #90
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Out of curiosity, how deep is the "blue" pigmentation? It doesn't appear to be all the way through the material. Can you take a close up of the broken edge of the blue part?
his 2nd picture (left piece) shows that it in fact does not go all the way through, it is an overlay blended.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.