ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 December 2016, 12:27 PM | #61 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
No watch unless he specifically stated he wanted that.
|
7 December 2016, 12:29 PM | #62 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
My condolences to your family. However id prefer not to be displayed with my watches if it was me.
|
7 December 2016, 12:31 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Austin
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Watch: Steel Professional
Posts: 82
|
|
7 December 2016, 01:00 PM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,674
|
Quote:
My thoughts exactly. It's more important what he wore in life and not in death. I see no issues either way. But, memories are built with pieces in good times and bad. Having close family wear his pieces is a great idea. Sorry for your loss, OP. |
|
7 December 2016, 01:04 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
|
Will Eddie van Halen be buried with his guitar..sorry but I think it's dumb to present a body with stuff
|
7 December 2016, 01:23 PM | #66 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,259
|
I agree with no watch at the viewing--unless in some way it was truly inseparable from his persona in all circumstances while living. I am thinking of those who always wore glasses being presented with glasses, for example.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
7 December 2016, 01:29 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 1,003
|
I would say a watch (pres would get my vote) for the viewing but removed before burial and given to a family member. These watches should be passed down to future generations.
I would never think of it being stolen during the viewing, I can't imagine that's truly a big enough issue to worry about. If it is....some tape around the clasp that would be unseen but make it difficult to remove descreetly could solve the issue. |
7 December 2016, 02:43 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
|
Personally I'd like to have my watches passed down to my children rather than go with me. If your uncle's family are determined the should be buried with one of his favourite watches then I'd say the G-shock. Drop a new battery in it for him and it should still be running when he's long turned to bones. Just remember to check there isn't an alarm set (apparently they last as much as 10 years if you don't use the alarm or light). Alternatively, if your uncle had a sense of humour maybe set the daily alarm so he can give visitors to the crypt a shock.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 December 2016, 03:17 PM | #69 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
7 December 2016, 03:26 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 302
|
You get the jewelry back before they are entered. I say, if this was his normal look (wearing a Rolex) then let him wear it for the final viewing.
|
7 December 2016, 03:58 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
|
Sorry for your loss. Was there anything in his will regarding dispensation of the watches?
I'd definitely lean towards no watch or G Shock. This could have been one crazy "is it safe" thread. |
8 December 2016, 01:15 AM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Orleans
Watch: Bluesy, Hulk, DJ
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
http://www.vhnd.com/2014/12/08/dime-...mebag-darrell/ As to the original question - I'd say go with the G-Shock or no watch at all. As much as we'd like to think the best of folks and give benefit of doubt, there will always be those who go astray. Seeing a Rolex on the deceased could easily be too much temptation on not only fellow family members and guests but also the funeral home staff members, etc. I knew a guy in college that worked nights at a funeral home. He would hear stories of jewelry going missing on a very regular basis. Remove it from the equation and it's a non issue. |
|
8 December 2016, 02:38 AM | #73 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 1,070
|
OK to Wear Rolex at a Funeral?
To balance things out, the most annoying person of the family should be enterred with him.
Just saying |
8 December 2016, 04:59 AM | #74 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
|
Responses were very insightful. Fortunately the final decision(s) are not up to me. A neighbor down the street recalled that when he was living in upstate NY, there was a funeral home that offered what they called 'The King Tut Experience'. It was a silver (or gold painted) casket with a special compartment to hold valuables for the next phase/journey. According to him, people often included items like gold coins, jewelry, old photos, achievement trophies, Hasselblad/Leica cameras, a Sony Walkman and just about any anything else that might be of personal importance or significance. Hopefully they were of use to the deceased as the mortician charged an additional $2500-$3000 for this feature. As far as sporting a Rolex on the way out, it's a judgement call. Incidentally and in lieu of the watch, his local AD (they served on the local school board together) has offered to loan the family a green/gold Rolex banner for the services providing he can leave a few store business cards near the entrance. *L*
|
8 December 2016, 05:11 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
No watch. Also why would you put a g-shock on him. The reason the OP is asking because he was a huge Rolex fan. You're acting like the deceased needs a watch to tell time or something.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
8 December 2016, 05:29 AM | #76 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
Quote:
|
|
8 December 2016, 07:36 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: midwest
Watch: sea dweller
Posts: 120
|
can absolutely guarantee you when the first shovel full of dirt hits the top of the lid that there will not be a Rolex in that box.
|
8 December 2016, 08:18 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: uk
Posts: 1,050
|
Emotions will be high, but common sence needs to take over. I am sure you have a nice photo with him enjoying life and wearing his Rolex. This should be on show next to him and then no need for the watch to be worn. The picture will be remembered. R.I.P.
|
8 December 2016, 02:13 PM | #79 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
wow...some of these comments are bewildering...
as someone who worked in the funeral industry for for 4 years as a funeral director assistant at the largest family owned funeral home(s) in Canada..I can assure you that many people wore watches, jewellery etc in the casket.....many wore sports team jerseys(NFL,NHL etc)....some wore their 'hunting' gear.....what I'm getting at is funerals are a celebration of life for loved ones and during a viewing anything go's dress code wise depending on the individual or families preference.... as for the jewellery and rolex.....OF COURSE ITS NOT BURIED the family takes all the jewellery and watches or anything of value just BEFORE the final closing of the casket which is done after all the guests leave the viewing..... I've participated in visitations that were downright sad to basically a 'party'..... everything is determined by age, cause of death, culture etc etc.....you can imagine how many ways their are to die...... im ranting but YES OF COURSE its ok for the deceased to wear a rolex in the casket......just make sure it is removed before casket closed for final time.... |
8 December 2016, 02:55 PM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
|
No watch.
|
8 December 2016, 04:08 PM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Scotland
Watch: 116333
Posts: 415
|
Funeral is not a show. For me it seems really silly when people put jewelry, expensive watches on corpse. Also, I heard stories when bodies were dug up by burglars in order to steal such jewelry.
I would suggest to have normal funeral and not to include such show elements. Putting G-Shock is even more ridiculous suggestion. |
8 December 2016, 04:39 PM | #82 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Butterfly
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 637
|
Quote:
If his watches can't be given to a family member, they could be sold with the proceeds going to charity (in his name). Sorry but I just can't imagine leaving one on him (even his Sub) as it could easily be taken by family, the funeral or burial staff. |
|
8 December 2016, 05:00 PM | #83 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I would remind people that "replicas" are not appropriate for anyone, including the dead.
The counterfeit trade is illegal and is in fact organized crime. Moreover, we don't discuss these matters on TRF, except in "Watch Out."
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
9 December 2016, 12:48 AM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
|
No watch at all. Pass the watch down to someone who would appreciate it... any watch aficionado would want that
|
9 December 2016, 02:17 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Vermont
Watch: SS Sub TT Sub
Posts: 13
|
Set the date and time he passed, keep the crown pulled out. Boom.
|
9 December 2016, 05:40 AM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,678
|
no watch
|
9 December 2016, 05:56 AM | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
|
|
9 December 2016, 06:18 AM | #88 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: United States
Posts: 1,864
|
I wear my Submariner pretty much 24/7 (exclusive of showers) so I have no idea what the self-winding reserve time is on the internal movement. Watch still running (in the casket) might raise some curiosity amongst various Rolex WIS' (if any). A stopped movement would be downright creepy.
|
9 December 2016, 10:32 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: São Paulo
Watch: dd40 228235
Posts: 214
|
No watch.. Rolex is just something material which he doesn't need anymore. He needs peace and rest!
R.I.P
__________________
_______________________________ "So I live each day, like I know that is my last" RS |
9 December 2016, 10:44 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
|
I have been ignoring this thread as I thought it was a question about whether someone attending a funeral can wear his/her watch, didn't know it was about the deceased.
Would be such a waste of a good watch that could serve a family member well, and keep the deceased's memory alive.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.