ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 November 2017, 01:21 PM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ellijay, GA
Posts: 1,504
|
Do we have to bench race AWD vs RWD? I mean, I think everyone understands why on the street a car with a couple hundred HP less with AWD will leave a more powerful car. Doesn't really make one car "better" than the other. It's all subjective. The Demon is an incredible car. So is an AWD R8 or an R35.
|
16 November 2017, 01:25 PM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eawOtLnMgo8 |
|
16 November 2017, 02:38 PM | #63 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Quote:
So when you gonna slap a couple turbos on your Audi??
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
|
16 November 2017, 03:00 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,611
|
I love the idea of a car that can do wheelies bone stock and is designed to have that kind of super aggressive weight transfer to the rear wheels from the factory.
I'd never buy one but that doesn't mean I don't appreciate it for what it is. |
16 November 2017, 04:42 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 374
|
I love the difference in car culture as when I read "Worlds fastest..." I pictured a Nurburgring fastest lap with active aero and when the link opened, it was 800bhp in a Dodge Charger body!
Yep, dragstrip worthy but race track? Have they put it round a track to see what it's capable of? |
16 November 2017, 05:34 PM | #66 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
I had a Mustang Cobra for a while; it was a great car for accelerating into traffic. There's no way I'd consider such a beast as the Demon although I've been following it since it was first announced. I'll stick with my cute little Mini S which can get me in more than enough trouble if I'd let it. It a lot of fun to commute in. Nothing like the Demon makes sense to me any more even if it is the fastest production car for 0 to 100 mph and it will pop wheelies.
https://www.dodge.com/demon.html |
16 November 2017, 05:51 PM | #67 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
|
I'd rather have 2 of these for the price of the demon.
https://youtu.be/mbsYPXAJhxU Just saying. The owner of this one is wearing a nice two tone steri dial Sub! (Skip to 8:25) https://youtu.be/kSteNPIC-qk
__________________
|
16 November 2017, 08:46 PM | #68 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
|
Quote:
I see it all the time on the car forums. Instead of appreciating the incredible beast that is the Demon, your reaction is to poo poo it and explain why your car is better. Your Audi also is a work of art. An incredible machine that has earned its status as a super car. That doesn’t mean you can’t appreciate the DD for what it is. The Audi and the Demon are two incredibly different cars. Both are something special in my book.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
|
16 November 2017, 11:46 PM | #69 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Gone
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
I’ll just leave this here. https://youtu.be/Y5Sb-A_EX0g |
|
16 November 2017, 11:46 PM | #70 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 138
|
Quote:
|
|
16 November 2017, 11:48 PM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
straight line speed is over rated. a motorcycle can do it faster....
perhaps i dont get it but id rather have a vehicle that can turn at speed. very cool that they were able to make this for the price but it is what it is - a gimmick car.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
16 November 2017, 11:51 PM | #72 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
|
Quote:
Well, your cars are pretty damned incredible. I would love drive an R8, let alone have one.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
|
16 November 2017, 11:57 PM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 138
|
I think i'm over that now. Back when I was playing the game mostly in 2014-15 I could still be competitive at least in the middle ground. Now the middle ground runs high 7's in the 1/4 and 220+ in the half. Contrary to what anybody says those cars break pretty often at that level and require tons of maintenance.
The only ideal build I would like to do would be maybe a UGR stg 3. But that build is like $140k now. Mostly money i'd never get back. I really don't drive the car that much as it is and probably would drive it less as a monster. 1250 whp doesn't get you far in competition and would probably just threaten my livelihood on the street. I sunk enough $ into the GT-R for a lifetime. I wanted to have a true 1000+ street car for a while and did that. Growing up sucks LOL. |
17 November 2017, 12:01 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 138
|
I would rather have a ZR1 or even a new Z06 at the same money as a Demon but I think its awesome that they even made the Demon, gimmick or not. Many people that are getting a Demon i'm sure will already have a full stable of cars that can turn.
|
17 November 2017, 12:59 AM | #75 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Gone
Posts: 448
|
Quote:
I’ll just leave this here. https://youtu.be/Y5Sb-A_EX0g |
|
17 November 2017, 01:07 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
lol @ the track comments.
This is why I stopped posting on car forums. Too frustrating. |
17 November 2017, 01:21 AM | #77 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: .
Posts: 668
|
Such cars should be prohibited from street use.
|
17 November 2017, 03:40 AM | #78 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ellijay, GA
Posts: 1,504
|
Quote:
It'll out brake a Viper ACR from 60 as well. |
|
17 November 2017, 03:40 AM | #79 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Ellijay, GA
Posts: 1,504
|
|
17 November 2017, 04:11 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Poker Table
Watch: Rolex, AP
Posts: 491
|
|
17 November 2017, 05:07 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 138
|
Once again just saying that the numbers that everyone is quoting won't be easily repeatable by most people on the track much less the street. That is all. Yes the Demon is an awesome fast car that will be a handful to drive and will get beat by many cars with much less power. Cars like GT-Rs, R8s , Huracans and Porsche turbos have easily repeatable results by anyone and will be much faster in your average stoplight showdown. That is all. Yes the Demon is 2.3xx or whatever to 60 but I bet its a good bit slower on an unprepared surface where the other cars will do their 2.6-2.9 or whatever all day long. A few people who think horsepower is everything around here think their Demons on order will be the fastest things around just because they have 840 hp.
|
17 November 2017, 05:18 AM | #82 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
Part of me thinks almost every car should be offered at 500-600hp but there is a point where you can overpower the chassis. The Jaguar F-type V8 they made 4 wheel drive because it was almost impossible to drive as 2-wheel drive. Anyway looking forward to how this car performs.
|
17 November 2017, 05:23 AM | #83 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
|
|
17 November 2017, 06:33 AM | #84 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Quote:
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
|
17 November 2017, 07:24 PM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Any luck? I can't imagine there's a lot of Demons in Canada.
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
18 November 2017, 02:02 AM | #86 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 10,410
|
Well, my dealer whom we have a very good business relationship and outside of business relationship showed me the email from the Chrysler head of distribution in canada and said all cars are spoken for and nothing available. He is going to have a sit down next week and see if he can work something out, but no promises. Wow, this car is going to get some big bucks further down the line.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 November 2017, 06:37 PM | #87 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Quote:
I would imagine if you could pick up one of the few imported to Canada, it would be worth big bucks 40 years from now
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
|
19 November 2017, 09:25 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 36
|
Not anymore... Tesla roadster 2 goes 0-60 in 1.9 second.... 1/4 mile in 8.8.
|
19 November 2017, 07:18 PM | #89 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Quote:
Well that's not actually a real car just yet and I get the feeling Musk can't afford to put it into production since he's selling seats for it at $50k without a deliverable car. Sounds like a sucker bet to me considering how many people got hosed on their model 3 reservations. Good way to tie up 50k for x amount of years without interest.
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
|
23 November 2017, 07:08 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Dodge Demon
Due to the friction coefficient of tires reportedly on that car Issac Newton would be calling BS. The only reason cars like modern F1 and LMP don’t even approach that. The amount of downforce required to over come the friction coefficient is staggering. Look at the fastest F1 cars with engines maxed out and downforce maxed average 3-2.5a and maybe a little better 1.9 i believe is the record. Line that Tesla up against a bottom marker Sauber and I’ll bet the sauber takes it to 60 and won’t look back and I’m talking straight line. The tires just can’t get the traction. Unless Tesla has used some kind of sticky substance to cheat there is no way. It breaks the laws of physics. That Tesla will probably accelerate faster once it gets up to speed but the lack of downforce simply will not allow the power to be laid to the road. There is a reason F1 and race cars need to go asFastAs Possible in turns otherwise the tires won’t hold. I want to see it on true tires. Yes a top fuel car can do it in under a second but the physics still apply to that and look at those tires. Acceleration is faster at 100-150 than off the line simply due to downforce. If any of you are interested Adrien Newey has a wonderful explanation how we are reaching the limit of just how fast a car can accelerate. It’s similar to Moore’s laws with computers. There is a threshold and we are rapidly aproaching it if not there. How can cars 10 years ago with less than half the HP be only a few tenths off thousand HP cars. Simple. Traction.
And if you think a GP motorbike has a chance against a F1 f2 or even a F3000. Google it. They are quick but no where near the most technological cars in the world. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.