The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 May 2018, 03:57 AM   #61
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rolex addict View Post
I have never seen any such reference chart. Please provide a website or link and I will be more than happy to.
Here's one: https://www.watchclub.com/curated-by...ry-sub-decoded

VRF also has one: https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/vint...nn-t11697.html

Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2018, 04:10 AM   #62
Rolex addict
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Very cool. Thanks. This is why I love TRF. Get to learn new stuff.
Rolex addict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 May 2018, 09:55 AM   #63
gbmarq88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Greg
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Watch: OWC snowflake
Posts: 6
Thanks guys - good info.

However, I just thought of something...

Doesn't Rolex engrave the serial number between the lugs at 6:00, and the MODEL number between the lugs at 12:00? (Pre-rehaut engraving of course)

Therefore, the model number would be either 16610 -or- 16610LV.

Wouldn't that verify that the original watch is, in fact, a "Kermit"? (LV = Lunette Verte)
gbmarq88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 12:24 AM   #64
Polowu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: amsterdam
Watch: Rolex Milgauss
Posts: 18
Imho Fat 4 are just a hype. Soon there will be more of them than pointed ones on the market and that sub bubble will pop.
A friend has a mark 1 dial with pointed 4 bezel. The whatch has never left his wrist and I always remember him wearing it.....
Polowu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:51 AM   #65
onshow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbmarq88 View Post
Thanks guys - good info.

However, I just thought of something...

Doesn't Rolex engrave the serial number between the lugs at 6:00, and the MODEL number between the lugs at 12:00? (Pre-rehaut engraving of course)

Therefore, the model number would be either 16610 -or- 16610LV.

Wouldn't that verify that the original watch is, in fact, a "Kermit"? (LV = Lunette Verte)
Rolex engraved 16610 T on one side and the serial number on the other side. No where will you find LV engraved on any of the anniversary watches.
onshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:55 AM   #66
onshow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polowu View Post
Imho Fat 4 are just a hype. Soon there will be more of them than pointed ones on the market and that sub bubble will pop.
A friend has a mark 1 dial with pointed 4 bezel. The whatch has never left his wrist and I always remember him wearing it.....
Hi Polowu, the 16610LV FAT 4's were only made for a very short period of time
from sep 2003 to Oct 2004 and are now obviously discontinued so i am confussed how there will be more Fat 4's than pointed 4's (which were in production for approx 6 years) as you stated above????

Care to share how you came to this conclusion?
onshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:56 AM   #67
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
LV non engraved rehaut are the true anniversary models
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:37 PM   #68
fleabag
"TRF" Member
 
fleabag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,212
Quote:
Originally Posted by onshow View Post
Hi Polowu, the 16610LV FAT 4's were only made for a very short period of time

from sep 2003 to Oct 2004 and are now obviously discontinued so i am confussed how there will be more Fat 4's than pointed 4's (which were in production for approx 6 years) as you stated above????



Care to share how you came to this conclusion?


I would like to see what answer he comes back with


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
fleabag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 09:24 PM   #69
Polowu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: amsterdam
Watch: Rolex Milgauss
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by onshow View Post
Hi Polowu, the 16610LV FAT 4's were only made for a very short period of time
from sep 2003 to Oct 2004 and are now obviously discontinued so i am confussed how there will be more Fat 4's than pointed 4's (which were in production for approx 6 years) as you stated above????

Care to share how you came to this conclusion?


Based on the fact in 2008 only 4-5% of the kermit for sale were fat 4s, when I look around nowadays we are already around 7-8% of them. Based on the possible profit you will see there number rising only more and more.
Polowu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2019, 12:26 AM   #70
onshow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polowu View Post
Based on the fact in 2008 only 4-5% of the kermit for sale were fat 4s, when I look around nowadays we are already around 7-8% of them. Based on the possible profit you will see there number rising only more and more.
Interesting conclusion, would love to see the source of those percentages.

Did you take into consideration all those fat 4 Kermit’s that have been lost/damaged, serviced with non genuine parts, bezel changes, lost warranty papers etc.??

My opinion stands, these rare 50th anniversary 16610LV Fat4’s continue to gain attention from collectors and are getting harder and harder to find in “original genuine” condition with papers. There will always be demand for these unique, discontinued models.
onshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2019, 12:48 AM   #71
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
It’s flat 4 not fat 4......
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 07:26 PM   #72
onshow
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 148
Elephant, Lion, Same......
onshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 08:12 PM   #73
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,573
Does anyone know how many of each year were produced out of curiosity? I have the more common of the run which is an early Z with paper/cert (not the card). I could have sworn I had seen another Z listed for sale on TRF months back in which the seller stated in his LV for sale headline 1/18XX were produced.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 08:21 PM   #74
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by onshow View Post
Hi all,

With the price of these beautiful watches increasing and in high demand it's interesting to see the price variance between the flat 4 and pointed 4.

The big question is which year is the genuine 50th Anniversary watch?

The first 16610LV's were sold in 2003 but the first sub was released in 1954 at Baselworld so a 2003 16610LV would make it 49 years since the first sub so it begs the question are the 2004 model/purchased 16610LV's the genuine 50th Anniversary models and the ones that are most desirable?

This would make the F series the genuine 50th Anniversary watches???

Thoughts???
All 16610LV are anniversary subs its only in internet land that the so called true anniversary subs exits.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 08:52 PM   #75
HappyFish
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Monaco
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
All 16610LV are anniversary subs its only in internet land that the so called true anniversary subs exits.
No, no and 1000 times no! It`s not internet land - 50 years are 50 years and so the "real" anniversary models are only the ones from 2003! The market is always right and so are the premiums for the 2003 models! Basta!
HappyFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 09:06 PM   #76
HappyFish
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Monaco
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by onshow View Post
Hi all,

With the price of these beautiful watches increasing and in high demand it's interesting to see the price variance between the flat 4 and pointed 4.

The big question is which year is the genuine 50th Anniversary watch?

The first 16610LV's were sold in 2003 but the first sub was released in 1954 at Baselworld so a 2003 16610LV would make it 49 years since the first sub so it begs the question are the 2004 model/purchased 16610LV's the genuine 50th Anniversary models and the ones that are most desirable?

This would make the F series the genuine 50th Anniversary watches???

Thoughts???
Yes and no! The Submariner model went into production in 1953 and was showcased at the Basel Watch Fair in 1954.

At the official Rolex Website they mention 1953 as birth year of the Submariner! So it`s 1953!
HappyFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 09:37 PM   #77
Tavli3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jim
Location: miami
Watch: GMT II 16760
Posts: 1,676
I'll go by what Mr Market says and he says that the 2003 Y serial Flat Fours are the most valuable, with it seems the 2010/11 Random serial models right behind them.
Tavli3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2019, 09:46 PM   #78
SS Oyster
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleabag View Post
2003,Flat 4


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


You need to send all of that marketing hype back to Rolex and demand a 2004 watch. Rolex made a mistake, which you must demand they correct. LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2019, 12:33 AM   #79
fleabag
"TRF" Member
 
fleabag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,212
16610LV The real 50th Anniversary sub???

Quote:
Originally Posted by SS Oyster View Post
You need to send all of that marketing hype back to Rolex and demand a 2004 watch. Rolex made a mistake, which you must demand they correct. LOL


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Your right there , I’m going to throw all this rubbish & waste of paper in the bin ..... the full lot of it, right now



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
fleabag is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
16610lv , 50th anniversary


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.