ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 October 2019, 10:55 PM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 374
|
|
24 October 2019, 12:50 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Grosseto, Italy
Posts: 1
|
You can see the two models together
Please Token74 Inviato dal mio SM-G965F utilizzando Tapatalk |
24 October 2019, 01:58 AM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
|
|
24 October 2019, 07:34 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 265
|
15400 obviously. I'd go 15202 if you are concerned about the size.
|
25 October 2019, 12:18 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
15450 is okay for a 6.8” wrist but you need to buy an extra link
|
26 October 2019, 05:04 AM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: France
Posts: 32
|
Here is my 37mm 15450 on 6,7 wrist, perfectly matching with my current expectations (... whereas 12 years ago I was wearing & enjoying a roo...) :
|
28 October 2019, 05:26 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 156
|
Advice 15400/15450 on 6.8 wrist
15400 on 7” wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 October 2019, 09:27 PM | #68 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sal
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: Patek/Rolex/GS
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
15450: way too small and dainty (bracelet in particular is too narrow/tapered). It drove me crazy. IMO, it does NOT wear like a 40mm rolex. I hear this all the time, and don't agree at all. 15400: I could pull it off, but barely. Given that white will wear bigger, you have to be especially careful on a smaller wrist. It felt like a clock after a while. I think the 15400 is ideal for any wrist that is 7" or bigger. You're right the borderline and it may look fine on you. You really need to get a hold of a 41mm RO and try it on before deciding. |
|
28 October 2019, 09:43 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
41mm is huge. Just saw one today and it’s really not for me. 6.8” wrist.
|
29 October 2019, 12:23 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: France
Posts: 32
|
With my SD4k : not yet aware that 15450 was only 37mm !
|
29 October 2019, 08:58 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
That is the enigma of AP. Suddenly dial size is a decision point. It can be quite disorienting if you are used to Rolex watches.
|
17 November 2019, 03:01 PM | #72 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12
|
For me it’s all about the lug to lug measurement. I have a 6.5 wrist size and just got the blue dial 15400. It looked and felt big at first, but after a couple of hours of wear you get use to it. The 15400 wears similar to a PAM in my opinion. My daily watch is a Rolex OP 36.
I realize I don’t like watches that are top heavy. |
17 November 2019, 06:10 PM | #73 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
That looks perfect. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
|
17 November 2019, 06:21 PM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Finland
Posts: 646
|
IMO the 15300 is the classic size, 15400 looked way to big on my wrist..bigger than C Daytona or a Nautilus..
Based on the pics on this thread, the watch cannot at least be any bigger than what's already going on.. |
17 November 2019, 06:30 PM | #75 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Niki
Location: UK
Watch: Too many
Posts: 834
|
Quote:
Wow, looks amazing on you. I truly cannot wait to get one in Blue for my approx 6.25” flat wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
17 November 2019, 09:59 PM | #76 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: Royal Oak
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
|
|
18 November 2019, 03:37 AM | #77 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Glenn
Location: Long Island, NY
Watch: AP Royal Oak 16315
Posts: 184
|
It's amazing how different angles taken of the same watch will look markedly different. Here's my 15450 on my 6.5" wrist and shown alongside a few other watches in my collection. At 37mm it looks more like the blue Datejust 41 than the adjacent 36mm gold DJ. I think the case size compensates to a great extent for a smaller dial making the 450 a viable option. Odd how a 36mm vintage piece may look appropriate while a slightly larger sports watch may appear undersized on the same wrist.
|
18 November 2019, 07:02 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: US
Posts: 384
|
i still think 37 is the goat size for AP's 3120. it fits the watch best.
|
18 November 2019, 07:03 AM | #79 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 826
|
I have 6.75” wrist and the 41mm in black dial looks great on my wrist. However, you are looking at a white dial which will make it look bigger than my black one. So perhaps a 39 mm 15300 may be better as few here has suggested. I had a 36mm datejust before with silver dial and personally felt that dial size was small for me. Good luck.
|
18 November 2019, 08:20 AM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Zurich
Posts: 7
|
I have a 6.7 in wrist. For me the 37mm looked good and felt comfortable, with 41 just too much watch, confirmed when I saw a colleague with what must have been the 41. i spotted it from across the room and despite being the grey dial it looked massive. I didn’t try a 39 as there was no chance to join the 3+ year waitlist.
I think the right size depends what you are used to and how you want to wear the watch. I will be wearing it as a dress watch with a suit in a fairly reserved company, so don’t need the extra dial area. The watch I wear the most is a 36mm King Seiko from the 70s. If I wore a Seiko diver to work then maybe the 41 would be right. |
18 November 2019, 08:28 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: USA
Watch: FPJ RQ, RM 67-02,
Posts: 54
|
I have a 6.8” wrist. Here’s a 41mm 15500 vs the new 38mm ROC. At first the 38mm seemed small but now seems perfect while the 15500 oversized. I want a Jumbo!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
18 November 2019, 10:28 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 379
|
It depends on the profile of the wrist. Flat 6.8 wrist is just nice for 15400. If round wrist, it depends again if you like the lugs to extend a little beyond the top view of the wrist.
|
18 November 2019, 09:50 PM | #83 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 383
|
6.25inch wrist and I much prefer the 41mm. 37mm is too dainty for me.
Wearing a 41mm in the pic Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk |
19 November 2019, 03:15 AM | #84 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
|
|
19 November 2019, 09:28 AM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 383
|
|
20 November 2019, 05:24 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 113
|
|
20 November 2019, 05:49 PM | #87 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 281
|
|
21 November 2019, 04:34 AM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
|
21 November 2019, 09:32 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 383
|
Oh OK I see what you guys mean. The lugs are "fixed" and it doesn't really fit the contour of my wrists? Is that it?
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk |
21 November 2019, 01:20 PM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 113
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.