ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 July 2018, 12:47 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Fountain Hills,Az
Watch: All 3 Sea-Dwellers
Posts: 975
|
[QUOTE=jstan9;8791144]This is where I am. I never thought in a million years I’d want an ‘old man’s’ yellow gold Rolex but if I can save up enough, and if my SO approves, I’d love to get a DD or the Cellini moonphase!
I never said yellow gold, but that is exactly what I am now debating. I have always said I will get WG as it flies under the radar, but now the yellow gold has been appealing to me and have been looking at the differences between yellow gold and rose gold. If I can only wrap my 30 year old brain around the idea of getting an "old mans' watch.
__________________
Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 Rolex D-blue- Rolex Hulk Rolex TT Sub- Rolex SD4000 Omega Ploprof 1200 m Panerai 510 Panerai 785 set-NIB Rolex Airking |
25 July 2018, 12:59 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,973
|
Quote:
My advise to them is don't buy things you can't afford if your other priorities are not taken care of first. There are a lot more watches I could buy if I thought they'd hold their value similar to a savings account, but I just wouldn't do that. We all should have our emergency funds in savings (6+ months), our retirement accounts funded, and debt under control before thinking about frivoulus expenses.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too |
|
25 July 2018, 10:02 AM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
|
After reading this thread I’m torn...
|
25 July 2018, 10:34 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern Ontario
Watch: 19018N OQ
Posts: 848
|
I feel a lot of people overthink value retention nowadays. I've bought a couple of watches that I would lose my shirt on today if I ever thought of selling them off. (Piaget, Movado)
But I love them and they sang to me, and thankfully, they still do to this day years later. But that is not why people typically get into the watch game today. People's budgets are stretched, but they still want nice things, and don't want to have to take a hit of thousands of dollars if things go sideways and they need to shuffle money around. I get it. But as you said, when every other thread (almost literally) is about either the SS piece shortage or "which watch will keep or increase value" in the general section, I simply don't bother to reply to any of them. One interesting side benefit to the General section being what it is the last while, I have made a point to visit several of the other non RGD forums as of late. Like this one!!! What's the solution? If the mods banned every person that started a thread of: -Which watch will retain or increase value; -Why can't I buy a SS piece at MSRP and/or with a discount; -Please explain to me why a watch isn't an investment; (that last one ) We'd lose 20-30% of our people in short order. I just hope that people can move on and re-focus on what matters - mostly, how about a love for great timepieces? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.