ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: If not Rolex then which Watch Brand? | |||
Jaeger LeCoultre | 16 | 9.09% | |
Panerai | 29 | 16.48% | |
Audemars Piguet | 7 | 3.98% | |
Patek Philippe | 23 | 13.07% | |
Breguet | 1 | 0.57% | |
IWC | 21 | 11.93% | |
Omega | 53 | 30.11% | |
Girard Perregaux | 1 | 0.57% | |
Breitling | 21 | 11.93% | |
Vacheron & Constantin | 4 | 2.27% | |
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
31 January 2009, 10:16 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Nikos
Location: Greece
Watch: Audemars Piguet
Posts: 12
|
No matter if Patek is the ultimate luxury timepiece i would go for a Lange for sure !
Been in the factory of Patek as a special guest made me more crazy about their timepieces but i still love Lange more . So thats my 2 choices after Rolex ... http://www.maitresdutemps.com/ http://www.alange-soehne.com/en/watc...tourbillon.php |
31 January 2009, 10:48 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I voted Panerai. Honestly though I'd be hard pressed to not consider Omega (the Speedmaster is so iconic) and Blancpain.
|
31 January 2009, 10:51 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Si
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,655
|
It would be Omega, mainly vintage and I also like Seiko like chenx15. Mind you saying that I have a few different brands anyway but Rolex is at the top
Si |
31 January 2009, 10:51 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Lach
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 759
|
Well I would like to say Patek, but I can't afford one. So my 2nd choice would have to be Omega
__________________
Explorer 2-Polar Omega Seamaster Quartz |
31 January 2009, 11:34 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 185
|
I love Stowa and will be purchasing 2 of their line up later in the year. I love my GMTC but also acknowledge that my pounds are also funding a big marketing budget and AD mark up. The Stowas represent the flipside of the watch making coin, offering beautifuly designed, hand finished watches direct from the watch maker.
Given that there's shysters out there who'd knowingly pay 500 GBP for an 'ultimate' rolex replica, I just don't understand why they don't spend that same money on a genuine Stowa or Sinn and support the industry rather than the parasites. |
31 January 2009, 11:41 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Earth
Watch: must be rolex
Posts: 630
|
panerAI and then AP
|
1 February 2009, 05:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
This is a very interesting thread i hope more people vote!
|
1 February 2009, 03:17 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brendan
Location: Cougar Country
Posts: 825
|
I'm still learning about watches - many of the finer brands are so expensive and i'm not even really sure what would differentiate a $9000 Daytona from a $40000 chronograph. I can certainly tell the difference between my omega chrono and my 1675 GMT movement because the GMT movement is never noticed while the omega is. However, I would imagine that the subjective comparison between Rolex movements and more expensive brands is minimal. Therefore, why the extra expense? Now I do understand watches that have more complications being more expensive, but I think that for watches with comparable capabilities, there is a ceiling effect or a point of diminishing returns in regards to amount of quality per dollar. Therefore, I am perfectly happy with my Rolex GMT, Omega Speedmaster and Seiko Black Monster.
One thing I am not happy about is the Rolex vintage service policy. Brands such as PP will stand behind their products forever, not just 35 years. |
1 February 2009, 03:29 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 186
|
I would say Tudor and if that's too close to a Rolex then I guess I would probably say a Tag. But it's a moot point since a am a Rolex guy!
__________________
"There are only two types of people in this world, those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't". Bob Wiley 16030A, 16013, 116520 |
1 February 2009, 04:02 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: CAN / SIN
Watch: Plat. Masterpiece
Posts: 1,959
|
Definitely Patek.
I didn't like Patek until I tried one on, and now I see what is so great about them. Still too young to own a Patek though. I'll give it 30 years. |
1 February 2009, 09:20 PM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Actually Rolex is not my first choice in a watch brand and truth be known, not my second or even third or . . .
For quality and value, Omega would be my first choice followed by several others "above my pay scale" such as Patek, JLC, Chopard, Brequet. Panerai and Breitling are not among my possibilities. Fr. John† |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.