The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 June 2019, 10:41 PM   #61
Batmannr1
"TRF" Member
 
Batmannr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Martijn
Location: AmsRio
Watch: On the left wrist
Posts: 733
Almost perfect, I love my Sea-Dweller 43. The reason why I go to the gym and pump up my wrists. It has some presence.
I sold my SubC LN date, that one felt redundant next to the SD43.
Batmannr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2019, 11:23 PM   #62
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
Not a fan of this one personally, but maybe that’s because it’s too big for me.

It’s funny, people were crying out for a bigger SD when the 116600 was launched, and then when the SD43 came out there was a lot of love. But over time, love for the SD43 has died down, and people now seem to really appreciate the size of the 116600.

I’ve had my 116600 since 1st May 2014 and I like it today as much, if not more, than I did five years ago.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Based on my observation of the threads on here, as well as the increased inability to get one of these from an AD I would argue that the popularity has actually increased substantially since the watch was released. I remember when I was looking to buy one in March of 2018 there wasn’t a whole lot of love on the forums about the watch, with the exception of from a few folks. Now I’ve noticed the watch seems to be more popular with people on TRF, look at some of the polls where the SD43 is included...it’s interesting for sure.
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 June 2019, 11:49 PM   #63
jimcameron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ByDawns Earlylite
Watch: 16800
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
I think you may be getting confused with the deep sea.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I stand by my opinion, but will add the Deep Sea as well as they both are less than perfect IMHO.
jimcameron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 01:34 AM   #64
BamaBoy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alabama
Watch: SD 43
Posts: 10
Got one two weeks ago. 7.5 inch wrist. Have owned several Subs, Exp IIs, GMTs, etc. it is, in my opinion, the perfect Rolex. Along with the Polar Exp II 42, it makes for the perfect two watch rotation for me.
BamaBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 03:00 AM   #65
Roli4life
"TRF" Member
 
Roli4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimcameron View Post
It is a large, heavy, thick and ridiculously over-built watch that has a silly depth rating. If that makes it perfect for someone, then that is great, and they should buy one and enjoy it for decades. It's a bit like someone buying a Hummer H1 to run to the grocery around the corner.


Now that’s just a subjective bias, and unsubstantiated profiling.
AnyWho I gotta get my ass to the grocery store

Roli4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 03:01 AM   #66
Lemonvr6
"TRF" Member
 
Lemonvr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 463
If it was 40mm it would probably be the most popular modern Rolex
__________________
116710BLNR, 116610LV, 114060, 116710LN
Lemonvr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 03:05 AM   #67
Daveclock
"TRF" Member
 
Daveclock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Dave
Location: UK
Watch: ing and waiting!
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdgadave View Post
I think so!



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
For me that picture shows why the cyclops spoils the possibility of perfection.
Daveclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 06:47 AM   #68
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by GBD View Post
Please stop with the "50th anniversary" nonsense. It's not a thing.
Eh? It’s very much a “thing”
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 06:48 AM   #69
stewester
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.Wales
Posts: 253
Certainly not perfect for me - it's absolutely enormous!
stewester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 06:49 AM   #70
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Op. No, it’s not perfect. But it’s as close to perfection as any watch which is waterproof to 4000 ft can be.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 07:35 AM   #71
stephentross
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
stephentross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 896


This is perfection. I’ve tried all. Nothing comes close to this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stephentross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:28 AM   #72
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roli4life View Post
Now that’s just a subjective bias, and unsubstantiated profiling.
AnyWho I gotta get my ass to the grocery store



watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:28 AM   #73
Fat_ninja
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by zjd168 View Post
it is called SD43 here.
Lol
Fat_ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:37 AM   #74
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
That's a beauty for sure. For me, I'd go for a SDK 4000 as it fits more like a Sub.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:51 AM   #75
MTdweller
"TRF" Member
 
MTdweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ty
Location: West Coast
Watch: the time fly!
Posts: 1,493
Best modern SD yet IMO.
MTdweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 08:58 AM   #76
TheWatchEnthusiast
2024 Pledge Member
 
TheWatchEnthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: John
Location: US
Watch: 116610LV,SD43,BLNR
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by presario View Post
No. Needs a bigger dial, thinner bezel, and no cyclops.


I would love all of these changes!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TheWatchEnthusiast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 09:14 AM   #77
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
I like it but not all the time great in a rotation
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 09:19 AM   #78
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Not perfect, but the closest watch Rolex produces to perfect. I think shaving 1mm off the diameter and 1mm off the thickness would have made it perfect. Can't think of anything else I would want changed. Dial perfect, bezel perfect, bracelet beyond perfect if there is such a thing, and yes the cyclops is also perfect in my eyes!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 09:57 AM   #79
rob
2024 Pledge Member
 
rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Ca.
Watch: SS only
Posts: 865
Impressive watch. I have a 6.5” wrist and see all the remarks of a perfect watch fit. 7” wrist. With the dive extension taken out and sized correctly it is a very nice watch. No doubt that is has a commanding presence, to big for some but perfect for me!!!
rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 10:04 AM   #80
RobearH
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Robear
Location: Come and Take It!
Watch: 126710 BLRO
Posts: 1,632
It’s the SD43 and yes, perfect in size, looks and all around usefulness!
RobearH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 10:11 AM   #81
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
Nope, Rolex ruined the SD. It’s just an inflated sub. I liked when the 116600 wasn’t popular
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 10:31 AM   #82
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
Not perfect, but the closest watch Rolex produces to perfect. I think shaving 1mm off the diameter and 1mm off the thickness would have made it perfect. Can't think of anything else I would want changed. Dial perfect, bezel perfect, bracelet beyond perfect if there is such a thing, and yes the cyclops is also perfect in my eyes!

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk
Touche
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 10:53 AM   #83
T3F
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
No, but if you scaled the case down to being 40mm and 11-12mm thick and made the bezel a bit thinner, then I think it would be pretty close.
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral
T3F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 10:56 AM   #84
Mundi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 53
Yes. Proportions are perfect for me-- slim lugs so much better than those big blocks. Love it.
Mundi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 June 2019, 11:41 PM   #85
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by T3F View Post
No, but if you scaled the case down to being 40mm and 11-12mm thick and made the bezel a bit thinner, then I think it would be pretty close.
Not sure if this was said in jest or not, but you just described a Submariner. So I guess your perfect watch does exist.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S10 using Tapatalk
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 12:30 AM   #86
PanosI
2024 Pledge Member
 
PanosI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Panos
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: 16710
Posts: 8,704
It’s perfect and that red line is to die for.
126600 is the best contemporary sport rolex.
The only watch that managed to take it of my wrist is a Panerai icon.

PanosI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 12:32 AM   #87
Coolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: US
Posts: 250
No. Way too thick and big and thick----- and did I mention big? Very Invicta like
Coolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 12:38 AM   #88
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
To me, it’s pretty fine as a dive watch; but like all such designs, it’s a touch crude against something like a DD40. Horses for courses.
I have both; covers all bases. I don’t see any dive watch as sufficient by itself. So ‘perfect’ dive watch? Pretty close. ‘Perfect’ watch....no-where near. Too big and clunky.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 01:19 AM   #89
watchmework
"TRF" Member
 
watchmework's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: DC
Watch: 126710BLRO, 116600
Posts: 7,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coolex View Post
No. Way too thick and big and thick----- and did I mention big? Very Invicta like


You can’t be serious. Invicta, really
watchmework is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 June 2019, 01:27 AM   #90
Seattle911
"TRF" Member
 
Seattle911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Seattle
Watch: SD 43, Daytona
Posts: 117
For me it's a great watch and as my first Rolex. Was shopping for a submariner but it felt small on wrist, plus I feel the bracelet is too small and tapered.

SD43 announced and it is perfect for me. Not to small, good heft and presence.

To each their own.
__________________
SD43. White ceramic Daytona.
Seattle911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.