ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 May 2020, 11:05 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
Why in the world would LVMH not develop their own products, which are all very doable and within reality, rather than promoting their competitor’s watches and adding to Patek’s bottom line? The eventual move away from the Patek partnership is all but written on the wall. Change happens. |
|
8 May 2020, 11:20 AM | #62 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,003
|
Quote:
|
|
8 May 2020, 12:29 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
|
8 May 2020, 12:29 PM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
|
Is it bad that I care more about the Patek watchbox sized Tiffany box than the stamp on the dial? :)
|
8 May 2020, 02:24 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UTC/GMT -8 hours
Watch: yes
Posts: 415
|
|
8 May 2020, 02:40 PM | #66 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
|
Exactly.
|
8 May 2020, 11:17 PM | #67 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
I’m not sure it’s a forgone conclusion. First, PP is a niche offering for Tiffany. I think it can co-exist with a more affordable Tiffany branded watch with an LVMH movement. Second, I know that the Arnaults are simpatico with the Sterns. If the Stern family is willing to maintain this historic relationship, I think the Arnaults would maintain it. This gives them at least a bit of insight into PP and (not starting any rumors here), makes them a logical acquirer if PP were to ever come up for sale. |
|
9 May 2020, 12:06 AM | #68 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
|
|
9 May 2020, 02:03 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,003
|
Quote:
|
|
9 May 2020, 02:07 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UTC/GMT -8 hours
Watch: yes
Posts: 415
|
it may all be moot....
Tiffany’s Purchase by LVMH Could Be the Next Deal Derailed by Coronavirus https://www.barrons.com/articles/why...sk-51587761572 |
9 May 2020, 12:15 PM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
They already have a good thing going and all they have to do is print some words, something that is exclusive to them even. How hard can it be to keep going? |
|
10 May 2020, 03:49 AM | #72 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
If you (LVMH) owned a business that already manufactured world-class watch movements and you acquired an iconic, premier luxury brand with an underdeveloped line of watches, and you suddenly had the capability to create a new line of highly regarded luxury watches that (if done right) could establish a new, valuable profit center within the luxury watch category, would you opt to pursue this? Or would you continue to devote significant (and valuable) square footage of your flagship store for an exclusive salon for a competitor’s watches, which serves to enhance the prestige, marketing and profits of your competitor? |
|
10 May 2020, 04:02 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
There’s no better way to answer your question than to consult the free market to accurately determine how much of a premium the added Tiffany stamp garners. The percentage premium does appear to differ from one reference to another. A quick check of Chrono24 will provide you with information about particular references.
|
Tags |
tiffany & co. , tiffany dial |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.