The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 May 2020, 11:05 AM   #61
BigAppleBill
"TRF" Member
 
BigAppleBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoraTheExplorerII View Post
That wouldn't be very smart of them. Tiffany stamped Hublot doesn't have the same ring to it at all.
Please. Have a little imagination. There are entirely new possibilities and synergies as a result of LVMH’s purchase of Tiffany that don’t lead to the stupidity of a Tiffany-signed Hublot. Change is inevitable. Aside from creating special haute horology LE pieces sold exclusively at Tiffany boutiques under some of LVMH’s existing brands, the Tiffany brand itself has incredible potential for development. Again, think of an incredible Zenith-made movement adapted exclusively for an entirely new Tiffany watch made to compete head-on with all the top watch brands.

Why in the world would LVMH not develop their own products, which are all very doable and within reality, rather than promoting their competitor’s watches and adding to Patek’s bottom line? The eventual move away from the Patek partnership is all but written on the wall. Change happens.
BigAppleBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 11:20 AM   #62
dauster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAppleBill View Post
Some interesting info here, but it’s all for naught because now that LVMH is taking over control of Tiffany, I think they will likely dissolve the Tiffany/Patek partnership. LVMH owns several other luxury watch brands that it can promote within Tiffany as well as the option of reinvigorating the mostly overlooked Tiffany brand of watches. Imagine a newly designed line of Tiffany luxury watches with Zenith movements.

One thing is for sure, if the Tiffany/Patek partnership ends, Tiffany stamped Patek models will become rarer and are sure to command even higher prices.
Is this confirmed or speculation?
dauster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:29 PM   #63
BigAppleBill
"TRF" Member
 
BigAppleBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by dauster View Post
Is this confirmed or speculation?
LVMH announced the purchase of Tiffany recently. This is merely my take on where the new LVMH-owned Tiffany is headed.
BigAppleBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 12:29 PM   #64
GreenLantern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
Is it bad that I care more about the Patek watchbox sized Tiffany box than the stamp on the dial? :)
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:24 PM   #65
d11n
"TRF" Member
 
d11n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UTC/GMT -8 hours
Watch: yes
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern View Post
Is it bad that I care more about the Patek watchbox sized Tiffany box than the stamp on the dial? :)
Attached Images
 
d11n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 02:40 PM   #66
GreenLantern
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,223
Exactly.
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2020, 11:17 PM   #67
UmichNJ
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAppleBill View Post
Some interesting info here, but it’s all for naught because now that LVMH is taking over control of Tiffany, I think they will likely dissolve the Tiffany/Patek partnership. LVMH owns several other luxury watch brands that it can promote within Tiffany as well as the option of reinvigorating the mostly overlooked Tiffany brand of watches. Imagine a newly designed line of Tiffany luxury watches with Zenith movements.

One thing is for sure, if the Tiffany/Patek partnership ends, Tiffany stamped Patek models will become rarer and are sure to command even higher prices.

I’m not sure it’s a forgone conclusion. First, PP is a niche offering for Tiffany. I think it can co-exist with a more affordable Tiffany branded watch with an LVMH movement. Second, I know that the Arnaults are simpatico with the Sterns. If the Stern family is willing to maintain this historic relationship, I think the Arnaults would maintain it. This gives them at least a bit of insight into PP and (not starting any rumors here), makes them a logical acquirer if PP were to ever come up for sale.
UmichNJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2020, 12:06 AM   #68
BigAppleBill
"TRF" Member
 
BigAppleBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmichNJ View Post
I’m not sure it’s a forgone conclusion. First, PP is a niche offering for Tiffany. I think it can co-exist with a more affordable Tiffany branded watch with an LVMH movement. Second, I know that the Arnaults are simpatico with the Sterns. If the Stern family is willing to maintain this historic relationship, I think the Arnaults would maintain it. This gives them at least a bit of insight into PP and (not starting any rumors here), makes them a logical acquirer if PP were to ever come up for sale.
Thanks for the response. I appreciate the points you make, but I’m still convinced the partnership eventually dissolves as there’s really not enough compelling reason to continue to devote such a considerable amount of Tiffany resources to market and sell an outside brand.
BigAppleBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2020, 02:03 AM   #69
dauster
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAppleBill View Post
Thanks for the response. I appreciate the points you make, but I’m still convinced the partnership eventually dissolves as there’s really not enough compelling reason to continue to devote such a considerable amount of Tiffany resources to market and sell an outside brand.
Are you sure? I think it's great tool to sell the overpriced jewelry. I am sure there are plenty of husbands that like PP but that also spend a lot of money at tiffanys for their wifes.
dauster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2020, 02:07 AM   #70
d11n
"TRF" Member
 
d11n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UTC/GMT -8 hours
Watch: yes
Posts: 415
it may all be moot....

Tiffany’s Purchase by LVMH Could Be the Next Deal Derailed by Coronavirus

https://www.barrons.com/articles/why...sk-51587761572
d11n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2020, 12:15 PM   #71
DoraTheExplorerII
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAppleBill View Post
Please. Have a little imagination. There are entirely new possibilities and synergies as a result of LVMH’s purchase of Tiffany that don’t lead to the stupidity of a Tiffany-signed Hublot. Change is inevitable. Aside from creating special haute horology LE pieces sold exclusively at Tiffany boutiques under some of LVMH’s existing brands, the Tiffany brand itself has incredible potential for development. Again, think of an incredible Zenith-made movement adapted exclusively for an entirely new Tiffany watch made to compete head-on with all the top watch brands.

Why in the world would LVMH not develop their own products, which are all very doable and within reality, rather than promoting their competitor’s watches and adding to Patek’s bottom line? The eventual move away from the Patek partnership is all but written on the wall. Change happens.
No hollow conglomerate brand venture can ever hope to usurp highly collectible Patek Phillipe watches in brand cache, marketing prowess, or selling power. It's really funny to think that a Tiffany branded watch with a nicer Zenith movement could ever possibly replace Patek in sales. So many better watches out there in the same price range couldn't compete with Patek.

They already have a good thing going and all they have to do is print some words, something that is exclusive to them even. How hard can it be to keep going?
DoraTheExplorerII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2020, 03:49 AM   #72
BigAppleBill
"TRF" Member
 
BigAppleBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoraTheExplorerII View Post
No hollow conglomerate brand venture can ever hope to usurp highly collectible Patek Phillipe watches in brand cache, marketing prowess, or selling power. It's really funny to think that a Tiffany branded watch with a nicer Zenith movement could ever possibly replace Patek in sales. So many better watches out there in the same price range couldn't compete with Patek.

They already have a good thing going and all they have to do is print some words, something that is exclusive to them even. How hard can it be to keep going?
Good points. I don’t think anybody would suggest that LVMH can instantly create a line of Tiffany watches to surpass the brand caché of Patek. Rather the issue is whether LVMH would want Tiffany to continue to promote a rival brand.

If you (LVMH) owned a business that already manufactured world-class watch movements and you acquired an iconic, premier luxury brand with an underdeveloped line of watches, and you suddenly had the capability to create a new line of highly regarded luxury watches that (if done right) could establish a new, valuable profit center within the luxury watch category, would you opt to pursue this? Or would you continue to devote significant (and valuable) square footage of your flagship store for an exclusive salon for a competitor’s watches, which serves to enhance the prestige, marketing and profits of your competitor?
BigAppleBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2020, 04:02 AM   #73
BigAppleBill
"TRF" Member
 
BigAppleBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquawart View Post
Do you think that the T stamp only really matters on certain watches i.e. Aquanaut and Nautilus and nobody would actually care if its on a 5524 / 5205 and certainly not be prepared to pay the premium.
There’s no better way to answer your question than to consult the free market to accurately determine how much of a premium the added Tiffany stamp garners. The percentage premium does appear to differ from one reference to another. A quick check of Chrono24 will provide you with information about particular references.
BigAppleBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
tiffany & co. , tiffany dial


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.