Watch to Round out Rotation

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by Jabbo84

I suggest an invicta for you

Duly noted!

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by Watcheroo

I think so, yes. They’re quite different watches on the wrist

Thanks for your response, this definitely makes the decision an interesting one.

I appreciate all of the suggestions!

[Brny11]

Originally Posted by J-rob

Grand Seiko is certainly an option, any recommendations?

Just personal issue with GS. I owned two and LOVED them. Just the bracelet is not on par with the watch. It is a real shame. Also, the finish is INCREDIBLE, but it is also easy to scratch and once the integrity of the finishing is lost, it is near impossible to get it back. I hated wearing it as I was scared of scratches (which I could care less about on my Rolex). Sold both my GS and honestly don’t miss them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by Brny11

Just personal issue with GS. I owned two and LOVED them. Just the bracelet is not on par with the watch. It is a real shame. Also, the finish is INCREDIBLE, but it is also easy to scratch and once the integrity of the finishing is lost, it is near impossible to get it back. I hated wearing it as I was scared of scratches (which I could care less about on my Rolex). Sold both my GS and honestly don’t miss them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great input, would you go OP 39 or Exp I?

[zengineer]

Originally Posted by J-rob

I love my Sub and agree that it is perfect. However I’ll have to disagree about it not being noticeable. With a polo on a casual Friday, it is certainly noticeable. There’s no mistaking that I’m wearing a Rolex.



I think the OP in white may be more nonchalant.

That's easy...start with not buying another Rolex if that's a concern. Grand Seiko, Omega Seamaster....so many options.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by zengineer

That's easy...start with not buying another Rolex if that's a concern. Grand Seiko, Omega Seamaster....so many options.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

You make a valid point.

[timepieceluvr]

214270


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JayG]

Check out the Omega 300m diver.. cool watch, great movement, really good price

[jimcameron]

You don't need another watch. You have the perfect pair. Wear accordingly, save your $$.

[Brny11]

Originally Posted by J-rob

Great input, would you go OP 39 or Exp I?

I flip flop back and forth between the two. Usually would have said Exp, but tried the OP on a few months back and it is stunning (black or white).

People say exp is more versatile, and though I can’t disagree, it is a VERY slight advantage IMO, as both are 99% as versatile as the other.

The dial appears more proportionate on OP as the bezel shape (and maybe smaller bezel size?) makes the dial look rather large on Exp.

Exp is way more interesting IMO with 369, matte finish, triangle 12 marker, etc. (not to take anything away from sunburst dial on OP).

Unpopular opinion, but the bracelet is a wash for me as easy link is useless. It’s something like 5mm which is wayyyy to much. It’s either too tight or way to loose if you actually need to use it.

Explorer seems to be more coveted as Rolex sport models are always more popular than classic models. If the forums opinion is important to you (which is not a bad thing), the Explorer is way to go.

Unpredictable, but if future value is important to you, then again, Explorer appears at this point in time, the way to go.

For same price, I’d go Explorer. With a 1200-2000$ difference, I’d be just fine with an OP.

Since you have a classic model (and a beautiful one) I’d say go Explorer.

If you want to switch it up a bit try to find below El Primero used (new, you will take a bath on resale)

https://www.osterjewelers.com/produc...steel-bracelet

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by Brny11

I flip flop back and forth between the two. Usually would have said Exp, but tried the OP on a few months back and it is stunning (black or white).

People say exp is more versatile, and though I can’t disagree, it is a VERY slight advantage IMO, as both are 99% as versatile as the other.

The dial appears more proportionate on OP as the bezel shape (and maybe smaller bezel size?) makes the dial look rather large on Exp.

Exp is way more interesting IMO with 369, matte finish, triangle 12 marker, etc. (not to take anything away from sunburst dial on OP).

Unpopular opinion, but the bracelet is a wash for me as easy link is useless. It’s something like 5mm which is wayyyy to much. It’s either too tight or way to loose if you actually need to use it.

Explorer seems to be more coveted as Rolex sport models are always more popular than classic models. If the forums opinion is important to you (which is not a bad thing), the Explorer is way to go.

Unpredictable, but if future value is important to you, then again, Explorer appears at this point in time, the way to go.

For same price, I’d go Explorer. With a 1200-2000$ difference, I’d be just fine with an OP.

Since you have a classic model (and a beautiful one) I’d say go Explorer.

If you want to switch it up a bit try to find below El Primero used (new, you will take a bath on resale)

https://www.osterjewelers.com/produc...steel-bracelet

You make some excellent points. I think I will start the hunt on an Exp I, while also still keeping my eye on the OP 39.

The only hesitation with the Exp was the overlap with the sub, but that may not be an issue.

[J-rob]

I've settled on the White OP. What do you guys think of the fit on these?

I was able to try on the black OP and the white Oyster Date in the same size.

[FLGatorM5]

That’s a Datejust isn’t it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[J-rob]

Originally Posted by FLGatorM5

That’s a Datejust isn’t it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Second one is an oyster date, just for sizing purposes with the white dial.

AD did not have a white OP.