The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2009, 03:11 AM   #61
Sdracing
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by mretzloff View Post
All of my relatives from Germany tell me that Audi is known as the poor man's Mercedes in Germany. How true that is, I don't know.

I have not heard that before. Audi has a significant racing history. All three companies entry level sedans are in the same price category with Audi being more than BMW.

Here is an article from a German review of all three cars.
http://www.germancarblog.com/2007/12...-3-series.html


All three make great cars!
Sdracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 04:23 AM   #62
vh_bu98
"TRF" Member
 
vh_bu98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by betrezra View Post
We've got a couple MB's in the family and zero reliability issues so far.

Regarding benz performance...... when I was a young punk in a z06 years ago I pulled up next to an old fella in a convert MB V-12 bi-turbo..... he was drinking a big mug of coffee at 5am ........ I eased off the light briskly as I always did in my z06..... and he nails it...... so I nailed it too..... working as hard as I could with each gear with partial traction......... well..... this old fella blew my doors off with one hand on the wheel and the other holding his coffee..... I believe he even took a sip of coffee during this pizzing-competition..... the mb had zero traction issues, zero drama, and zero effort on the part of the old-fart :)..... MB can build performance cars.

The wife is chatting more about an offwhite 400+HP BMW as he next car though..... so we'll see. I'm not sure what model would fit this description..... I'm thinking M3?
MB can build performance cars and the V-12 bi-turbo is a great car with a hefty price tag.

The only design that like is the CLS. The current C class has tail lights that remind me of the old Acura CL.

As for a 400+ HP BMW, any of the Ms will fit the bill.
vh_bu98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 04:46 AM   #63
xblk33360
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Watch: DJ II, Calibre.
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by vh_bu98 View Post
MB can build performance cars and the V-12 bi-turbo is a great car with a hefty price tag.

The only design that like is the CLS. The current C class has tail lights that remind me of the old Acura CL.

As for a 400+ HP BMW, any of the Ms will fit the bill.
well, i think most people when they talk about performance, they don't only talk about horsepower. yes, mercedes do build cars with V12 bi-turbo (ie. S65, CL65) but those cars really only have good 0-60mph performance. they have 500+ HP too but when it comes to actual performance of the car (which includes balance, weight distribution, cornering, even the feel of the drive), bmw wins.
xblk33360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 06:59 AM   #64
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by xblk33360 View Post
well, i think most people when they talk about performance, they don't only talk about horsepower. yes, mercedes do build cars with V12 bi-turbo (ie. S65, CL65) but those cars really only have good 0-60mph performance. they have 500+ HP too but when it comes to actual performance of the car (which includes balance, weight distribution, cornering, even the feel of the drive), bmw wins.
This is a gross generalization how about SLR, Black series etc. I have driven most bmws as well as mercs and comparing an m series to an e series sure I would agree but not to black series or slr.
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 07:25 AM   #65
simoesm
"TRF" Member
 
simoesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Manuel
Location: Portugal
Watch: SS Sub Date Black
Posts: 260
IMHO, I have had both and still have a BMW, the MB is more for the family and comfort, the beemer is for you, man.
Love both cars but, much more fun driving a BMW.
__________________
1999 SS Tag Heuer 1500 blue dial & bezel
2001 SS Omega Speedmaster silver dial
2008 SS "M" Subdate black dial & bezel
simoesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 08:43 AM   #66
xblk33360
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Watch: DJ II, Calibre.
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainbizz View Post
This is a gross generalization how about SLR, Black series etc. I have driven most bmws as well as mercs and comparing an m series to an e series sure I would agree but not to black series or slr.
well obviously it was a generalization concerning the V12 biturbo engine. my reply mostly regarded the V12 engine. the SLR doens't have the V12 engine, and the only reason why the SLR is what it is is because of McLaren. and BMW actually doesn't offer a car at that price range, so you can't really have the SLR compare to anything from BMW... (until BMW remakes the M1 !!)

now back to the black series, the only vehicle from mercedes that is a black series and has a V12 biturbo engine is the SL65 black series, but that car isn't even out yet, so unless you work for merc, u haven't driven that car yet. the only other black series would be the CLK63 Black Series, but the CLK63 sports a 6.2L V8, and not the V12. and the only car that BMW produce that is comparable to the CLK63 Black Series would probably be the M3 CSL, and the M3 CSL can blow the CLK63 Black Series away anyday.
xblk33360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 09:16 AM   #67
mretzloff
"TRF" Member
 
mretzloff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Submariner Date
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by xblk33360 View Post
well, i think most people when they talk about performance, they don't only talk about horsepower. yes, mercedes do build cars with V12 bi-turbo (ie. S65, CL65) but those cars really only have good 0-60mph performance. they have 500+ HP too but when it comes to actual performance of the car (which includes balance, weight distribution, cornering, even the feel of the drive), bmw wins.
Please let me know when in life you'll ever use the "actual performance of the car". In the city, you cannot even go that fast. On 99% of the highway, there is no major cornering.
__________________


"M" 16610 Submariner
"M" 16570w Explorer II
mretzloff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 09:25 AM   #68
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
I obviously have not driven a black series SL but have the CLK black and SLR. I was asked if i wanted a black series sl and passed. Quite frankly in general I think they both lack passion and lack feel the clk black series captures it to an extent. I will stick with Ferrari my wife can drive the mercs. In regards to the v12 bi turbo I have found the performance of the supercharged v8 to be very close except for noticeable torque. My wifes sl55 gave my cl65 a close race and the sl65 was not much faster. So why buy a v 12 bi turbo which will drop 20k just driving it off the lot.
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 12:55 PM   #69
vh_bu98
"TRF" Member
 
vh_bu98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by mretzloff View Post
Please let me know when in life you'll ever use the "actual performance of the car". In the city, you cannot even go that fast. On 99% of the highway, there is no major cornering.
If you ever visit Dallas, I'll introduce you to a few people who use the "actual performance of the car". Besides the 160+ MPH on the highway, they take their cars to the track as well. For some odd reason, the majority of them drive BMW M's.
vh_bu98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 01:04 PM   #70
jas55
"TRF" Member
 
jas55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Lach
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 759
I would favour a Mercedes over a BMW.
__________________

Explorer 2-Polar
Omega Seamaster Quartz
jas55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 01:47 PM   #71
simbal
"TRF" Member
 
simbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Posts: 833
I have owned several from each brand. To me they are not like watches. When I buy my watches, it is usually love at first sight. But for my cars, I have to drive it. My last comparison was Bimmer 6 versus MB CLS. After a test drive, I usually have already made up my mind!
simbal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 03:18 PM   #72
xblk33360
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Watch: DJ II, Calibre.
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainbizz View Post
So why buy a v 12 bi turbo which will drop 20k just driving it off the lot.
exactly.
xblk33360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 03:21 PM   #73
xblk33360
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Watch: DJ II, Calibre.
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by mretzloff View Post
Please let me know when in life you'll ever use the "actual performance of the car". In the city, you cannot even go that fast. On 99% of the highway, there is no major cornering.
well, we are talkign about the actual performance of the cars from each brand for the sake of this thread, and for the comparison of the two brands.

if you actually want to talk about the power and performance that you will ever need just for city drive, we might as well be talking about a nissan, a toyota, and honda, an acura, a lexus, or actually even about the new hyundai genesis if you want.
xblk33360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 03:25 PM   #74
Cato
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
Cato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 March 2009, 03:53 PM   #75
Ashley
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,967
Benz all the way!!
Ashley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2009, 01:00 AM   #76
astcell
"TRF" Member
 
astcell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cato View Post

The new "Handicapped" placard?
__________________
SS GMTII "D", TT GMTIIc "Z"
astcell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 March 2009, 07:13 AM   #77
vh_bu98
"TRF" Member
 
vh_bu98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashley View Post
Benz all the way!!
Have you driven both?
vh_bu98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 05:33 AM   #78
Soarhead2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 92
BMW 3 series e90 in jet black. Goes great with white face turn o graph
Soarhead2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 06:51 AM   #79
kzm40
"TRF" Member
 
kzm40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashley View Post
Benz all the way!!
X2 .. Have driven both... Never had a problem with Benz, I've had lots of problems with the only BMW that I had.
kzm40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 10:04 AM   #80
cowincanada
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16610
Posts: 170
for me, it depends on which year / model. In my opinion, from the 80's - 1992 MB was better than BMW. From 1993 - 2007ish, I preferred the BMW. The new C and E class though are great sedans, but 3 series if you want a coupe.

For cars though, its never a good idea to buy brand new. It depreciates the minute you take it round the block for a test drive.
cowincanada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:10 AM   #81
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieG View Post
I too have owned both. Current rides are X5 and M3. I prefer the BMW's. Overall, I like the sportier feel and handling characteristics of the BMW's.

Nice.
I have a 5 series and wife has X3.
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:15 AM   #82
djhiram
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Hiram
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: 16600 Sea Dweller
Posts: 1,233
I own 2 bmws....have driven many mb...to me it's bmw hands down. Drive one and you'll understand
djhiram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:28 AM   #83
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
Another old post from a year ago...........

Well, I still drive this one:

__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:45 AM   #84
KJacques
"TRF" Member
 
KJacques's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: USA
Watch: the skies
Posts: 1,250
They are both fine car makers that appeal to different tastes. I've had a couple of BMW's and they have decent driving feel. Mercedes feel a little more luxurious and of higher quality but also a little more mature. I think the original 635 is one of the most beautiful car designs ever. And the gull wing mercedes is an icon of classic styling.

Because BMW seems more oriented towards a sportier car, they leave me cold with their busy, generic looking designs and overweight feel in their handling. They also feel way too electronically over assisted for my taste in a "driver's car".
KJacques is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:47 AM   #85
Dr.B
"TRF" Member
 
Dr.B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Fernando
Location: North Carolina
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,944
MB=classic
Rolex=classic

BMW=sporty
Tag=sporty

sorry guys...MB takes it for me, currently E320....but looking at the new S500
Dr.B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:55 AM   #86
East Bay Rider
"TRF" Member
 
East Bay Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,073
I'm looking at used Mercedes C class 4-matic for my wife this year or next.
They seem nice.
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man
Floating down canal
It doesn't use numbers or moving hands
It always just says "now"
Now you may be thinking that I was had
But this watch is never wrong
And if I have trouble the warranty said
Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On
J. Buffett
Instagram: eastbayrider46
East Bay Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 11:58 AM   #87
shandy
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Ian
Location: canada
Posts: 1,724
Neither, it would be a Lexus for me if I were ever in the car market again, something about the quality of those cars and there is less of them as well.

Not sure what it is like everywhere else but in my city Mercs and Beemers are ten a penny, it seems to be rarer to see a ford!

Of the two if I had to though it would be the Merc, but then I am getting older and care less about handling than I do a comfy ride!
shandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:10 PM   #88
Dr.B
"TRF" Member
 
Dr.B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Fernando
Location: North Carolina
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by shandy View Post
Neither, it would be a Lexus for me if I were ever in the car market again, something about the quality of those cars and there is less of them as well.

Not sure what it is like everywhere else but in my city Mercs and Beemers are ten a penny, it seems to be rarer to see a ford!

Of the two if I had to though it would be the Merc, but then I am getting older and care less about handling than I do a comfy ride!
You are right....
The lexus LS is probably the best luxury car for the money.
MB is for class and durability
BMW for the sporty look

It's so sad that all these cars depreciate so fast.
A new MB S500 is about 95-100K, however I can buy a 4 year old one for 28-32K.....so,so sad but good(for a buyer).
Dr.B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 12:12 PM   #89
onkyo
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
Getting an X5 with the 4.8 L engine in a few days.

Can't wait to give back my Land Rover LR2.... tired of it.

onkyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2009, 01:20 PM   #90
Leasky
"TRF" Member
 
Leasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Colin Leask.
Location: Scotland, UK.
Watch: 118238 YG DD.
Posts: 723
I got my first BMW aged 21.

22 years later, I am still driving BMW's.

I had one Merc about 4 years ago for about 1 year but other then that one car, it has been all BMW.

The build quality of BMW has been very consistant, whereas Merc took their eye off the ball for several years when they moved some of their work outside Germany to save on costs.

This proved to be a false economy and I am told that the build quality is now back to what it used to be about 10 years ago.

I think that it all depends what you want from the car, what sort of driving you intend to do and how much wonga you are going to part with.

I have never bought a new car as the depreciation would break my Scottish heart.

Good luck and enjoy!
Leasky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.