ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2020, 07:06 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,587
|
I’d wait until this year’s Basel releases, just to see what changes Rolex might do to the Explorer I (i.e., present one with a while dial) or even any changes to the Oyster Perpetual.
Since you asked for our opinions, though, I’d keep the OP39. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
19 January 2020, 07:14 AM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: manchester
Posts: 162
|
Explorer 114270 is one of the best all rounders imo
I would trade ASAP. |
19 January 2020, 12:45 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,220
|
+1
__________________
Submariner 124060 Datejust 16233 |
19 January 2020, 10:48 PM | #64 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
[QUOTE=CNDguy;10301396]
Quote:
Learn how to use the quote feature so it doesn’t look like I’m the one littering it with profanity |
|
19 January 2020, 11:00 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: John
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex 114060
Posts: 658
|
Most people are right when saying get what sings to you, not what others like.
That said, since you are asking for opinions, I love the white OP and never really liked the Explorer. |
19 January 2020, 11:04 PM | #66 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 10,650
|
Get what you like. I sounds like you like the Explorer. You won't have any trouble shifting that lovely OP.
I'd keep both. But I guess that isn't an option. |
19 January 2020, 11:10 PM | #67 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,674
|
I think the OP is stellar!!! The only reason to go with the Exp imho is if you need better night legibility.
|
19 January 2020, 11:18 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 1,030
|
I would upgrade- go for it, you can always go back.
|
20 January 2020, 01:01 AM | #69 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 876
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk |
|
20 January 2020, 04:05 AM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,220
|
Just because one watch may cost more than another definitely doesn't mean it's an "upgrade". It's a matter of personal preference, that's all.
__________________
Submariner 124060 Datejust 16233 |
20 January 2020, 04:09 AM | #71 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,587
|
Quote:
Agreed- and in this particular case, I actually believe it’s a downgrade. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
|
20 January 2020, 04:14 AM | #72 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 1,144
|
I was in a similar position to yourself a little while ago. Had the OP but after trying an Explorer, yearned for one of those. A few months down the line picked one up from my AD and have recently sold the OP. Never looked back, though I think a white dial in any collection is a nice to have.
Whilst I had both I wrote up a comparison. I can’t speak about older references of the Explorer too much, but if you’re used to the current build quality, having a new watch and will appreciate elements such as the easylink then I’d go for a 214270. Here’s my write up; 214270 vs 114300 - Incoming & Follow Up Thread (Long read!) https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/top...ink_source=app |
20 January 2020, 04:32 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Arrakis
Posts: 874
|
I sold my OP39 white dial and it was purchased to mark an occasion. With that being said, it is a wonderful watch that didn't beg for attention. It has classy detail and an every day "wear feel" about it. Having owned one I can certainly see why it is becoming a watch collectors favorite that seems to escape the Rolex love/hate brand debate.
Another watched called out to me and it sounds like that is the same for you as well. You have to do what you want. I already have too many watches so I am trying to keep to a reasonable number that I will actually wear. They are luxury goods and we buy them for how they make us feel. Good luck. |
20 January 2020, 04:42 AM | #74 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,856
|
Shots fired!
__________________
. Sub No Date (14060); Tudor Ranger; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak. |
20 January 2020, 05:06 AM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Odorious Onion
Watch: yes, it's hipster
Posts: 1,587
|
Obviously, people are allowed to disagree with me. It's not personal shot toward anyone's taste.
One guy here said that the OP39 didn't scratch his Explorer I itch. That's cool. Personally, I don't see anything significant between the two watches, and wouldn't spend more just to have "3-6-9" on the dial.
__________________
Here come dat boi Jerry |
20 January 2020, 05:51 AM | #76 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 359
|
Love my Rhodium OP!
|
20 January 2020, 07:06 AM | #77 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,220
|
Quote:
__________________
Submariner 124060 Datejust 16233 |
|
20 January 2020, 08:31 AM | #78 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Marty
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Rolex-2
Posts: 297
|
My blue dial OP, to my eyes, looks dang near identical to the Exp. Yes there are minor differences but one has to really scrutinize to note them. So to me, going from the OP to the Exp. is nothing more than a lateral move. I wouldn't do it but that's me.
|
20 January 2020, 08:47 AM | #79 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2020, 08:19 PM | #80 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 359
|
|
21 January 2020, 01:10 AM | #81 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Posts: 1,220
|
*Beauty.
Damn spell-check!
__________________
Submariner 124060 Datejust 16233 |
21 January 2020, 01:28 AM | #82 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,398
|
|
21 January 2020, 03:37 AM | #83 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
|
Keep the OP. It is a solid Rolex that does not draw too much attention to itself.
__________________
Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek | 2 FA Enabled |
21 January 2020, 01:41 PM | #84 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Canadaland
Watch: Chnr, hulk, sub d
Posts: 135
|
Explorer is what nicer ! Go for it !
|
21 January 2020, 01:53 PM | #85 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
|
Thinking about this......I would not probably change the OP for the Explorer, although I prefer it.
I would get the DJ instead.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant |
21 January 2020, 08:40 PM | #86 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 16
|
|
21 January 2020, 09:16 PM | #87 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: HK
Posts: 51
|
Vote for explorer I
|
21 January 2020, 10:39 PM | #88 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,574
|
I’d get the explorer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 May 2020, 01:29 AM | #89 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Posts: 5
|
I'm actually considering the same thing. I have an OP39 and it's great, I just wish it were a little smaller. I'm a recent 36mm convert for time only watches. I used to have a 14270 but at the time I felt it was too slight and jangly, I would welcome that trade; OP39 for 114270. I would miss the modern build quality a bit, but I just can't let the explorer go. My ideal watch would be if they made the current model in a 36mm size, or even 37mm. Seems like with Rolexes there is always some minor detail that I wish they would change. For instance I wish the explorers had a domed bezel like the oyster perpetuals do.
|
23 May 2020, 06:30 AM | #90 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
|
The original Explorer has more in common with your OP 39 than with a modern 214270... just saying...
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.