ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

DCheeta · 1 August 2022, 05:01 PM

There’s actually a fairly big size disparity in how they wear. I have them both and they’re both awesome, you can’t make a wrong choice here. Just try them on if that’s possible, the right one will make itself apparent when they’re on your wrist.

S.Explorer · 1 August 2022, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samgobigs

I forgot to mention I have a 40 mm GMT 116710 LN. I suppose this it is too similar to the submariner and I should go for the explorer?

I know not everyone will agree with me, but if you have a GMT, I didn’t see much point in adding a submariner to the collection. The overall look is so similar.

I also have a 116710 LN. It's so similar to the Submariner looks-wise, the Explorer will be a much better choice notwithstanding that the Submariner will look too big.

I have a slightly larger wrist than you (6.7", flat) and I feel the 116710 is on the cusp of being too large / uncomfortable.

I am surprised by the amount of recommendations for the Submariner given your wrist size. It's like being recommended an ill-fitting suit.

Oscarpapa · 1 August 2022, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by S.Explorer

I also have a 116710 LN. It's so similar to the Submariner looks-wise, the Explorer will be a much better choice notwithstanding that the Submariner will look too big.

I have a slightly larger wrist than you (6.7", flat) and I feel the 116710 is on the cusp of being too large / uncomfortable.

I am surprised by the amount of recommendations for the Submariner given your wrist size. It's like being recommended an ill-fitting suit.

Doesn't surprise me, a large proportion of folks on this forum wear watches that are too big for them.

Alvar* · 1 August 2022, 09:46 PM

To me a watch is oversized if the lugs overhang. I have a 6,25 " wrist and I wear a black bay 41mm comfortably as my wrist is rather flat. In my opinion people tend to exaggerate watch sizes on the forums. a Proportionally sized diver as the current gen sub will wear most of the wrists just fine. Many non watch people wear ridicously sized smart watches which do look large and most of the "real" watches are modest in size compared to them.

I would still vote for the explorer as ceramic sub is rather blingy and there are occasions where you want to be low key.

DJ2020 · 1 August 2022, 10:02 PM

OP, reading your post, And adding that you have a GMT already. My opinion would be the Explorer. It's a very fine watch in what I think would be a perfect match for you.

I think you may find that in time the Explorer will steal most of your wrist time. You have already mentioned you were leaning towards the Explorer. Go with what YOU want and what your heart tells you. Don't be swayed by others as your the one wearing and paying for it. The decision is ultimately yours alone.

ogbeans · 1 August 2022, 10:07 PM

I wouldn’t even make a thread for this. SUB ALL DAY SON

Bobcat Sig · 2 August 2022, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oscarpapa

Doesn't surprise me, a large proportion of folks on this forum wear watches that they like.

FIFY

Kenny G · 2 August 2022, 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCheeta

There’s actually a fairly big size disparity in how they wear. I have them both and they’re both awesome, you can’t make a wrong choice here. Just try them on if that’s possible, the right one will make itself apparent when they’re on your wrist.

Great pic

krchrist · 2 August 2022, 03:04 AM

I own both, sub first and absolutely loved it and wore it basically ever day for a year. Just got the exp and it is just a fantastic every day watch, comfortable, looks great, etc. Had my sub on for a week on vacation and was itching to put the explorer back on

I have similar sized wrist… if wearing for fun/casual, go sub. If for everyday work, etc go explorer. Or better yet, turn on the charm and talk them into selling you both and youll be all set!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

warrior · 2 August 2022, 03:25 AM

Though I prefer the 39mm Exp because of the size, I can definitely see the allure of the 124270. The AR coating is a huge plus for both of these models.
Great pic!

Quote:

Originally Posted by krchrist

I own both, sub first and absolutely loved it and wore it basically ever day for a year. Just got the exp and it is just a fantastic every day watch, comfortable, looks great, etc. Had my sub on for a week on vacation and was itching to put the explorer back on

I have similar sized wrist… if wearing for fun/casual, go sub. If for everyday work, etc go explorer. Or better yet, turn on the charm and talk them into selling you both and youll be all set!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

matthew P · 2 August 2022, 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krchrist

I own both, sub first and absolutely loved it and wore it basically ever day for a year. Just got the exp and it is just a fantastic every day watch, comfortable, looks great, etc. Had my sub on for a week on vacation and was itching to put the explorer back on

I have similar sized wrist… if wearing for fun/casual, go sub. If for everyday work, etc go explorer. Or better yet, turn on the charm and talk them into selling you both and youll be all set!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is a much better size comparison photo because the watches are not sitting on different sized clasps.

….Save the drama - I’m just here for the photos….

noshame · 2 August 2022, 08:14 AM

I know not all 6.5" wrists are the same, some flat, some round, but for many, I think the 124060 will be on the cusp of looking too big. There's nothing wrong with that, personal choice. I like a watch that fits me well and looks like how it was intended to look on the wrist. If possible, definitely try on exhibition models. Good luck!

DoctorsOrders · 2 August 2022, 08:29 AM

Only way to really know is to go try it on!! If you have been offered it then they are more than likely in store, go and try both of them on and see which speaks to you

Wcdhtwn · 2 August 2022, 08:36 AM

If the Explorer was still 39 it would be a more difficult choice. But at 36 my vote is Sub all the way.

Jefferyasher · 2 August 2022, 10:22 AM

a 14060m would be better sized, but I'd go with the sub between these two.

1995akcoop · 2 August 2022, 11:12 AM

36mm is just too small. Go with the Sub. None of us here dive anyways… well maybe a handful. Still, get the Sub

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

chronical · 2 August 2022, 11:06 PM

I’ve same wrist size as you and I recently got to try on both.

They’ll both fit your wrists but in different ways. I found the Explorer has a more classic and understated look whilst the Submariner has a more sporty and aggressive presence.

You can’t go wrong with either, just depends on the look you’re going for!

1 August 2022, 10:02 PM	#65
DJ2020 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2020 Real Name: Wayne Location: NC Watch: 226570 Posts: 3,484	OP, reading your post, And adding that you have a GMT already. My opinion would be the Explorer. It's a very fine watch in what I think would be a perfect match for you. I think you may find that in time the Explorer will steal most of your wrist time. You have already mentioned you were leaning towards the Explorer. Go with what YOU want and what your heart tells you. Don't be swayed by others as your the one wearing and paying for it. The decision is ultimately yours alone. __________________ In the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years. - Abraham Lincoln __________________________________________________ Rolex 226570, Explorer II Club

2 August 2022, 08:14 AM	#72
noshame "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2020 Real Name: Alex Location: Canada Posts: 1,683	I know not all 6.5" wrists are the same, some flat, some round, but for many, I think the 124060 will be on the cusp of looking too big. There's nothing wrong with that, personal choice. I like a watch that fits me well and looks like how it was intended to look on the wrist. If possible, definitely try on exhibition models. Good luck! __________________ Submariner Date 116610LN \| GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee \| Explorer Rolesor 124273 \| Submariner Date Bluesy 126613LB

1 August 2022, 05:01 PM	#61
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,181	There’s actually a fairly big size disparity in how they wear. I have them both and they’re both awesome, you can’t make a wrong choice here. Just try them on if that’s possible, the right one will make itself apparent when they’re on your wrist.

1 August 2022, 09:46 PM	#64
Alvar* "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2020 Location: Finland Watch: 16610 & 116400 Posts: 136	To me a watch is oversized if the lugs overhang. I have a 6,25 " wrist and I wear a black bay 41mm comfortably as my wrist is rather flat. In my opinion people tend to exaggerate watch sizes on the forums. a Proportionally sized diver as the current gen sub will wear most of the wrists just fine. Many non watch people wear ridicously sized smart watches which do look large and most of the "real" watches are modest in size compared to them. I would still vote for the explorer as ceramic sub is rather blingy and there are occasions where you want to be low key.

1 August 2022, 10:07 PM	#66
ogbeans Banned Join Date: Dec 2021 Location: USA Posts: 195	I wouldn’t even make a thread for this. SUB ALL DAY SON

2 August 2022, 03:04 AM	#69
krchrist "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2021 Location: 'merica Watch: tbd Posts: 79	I own both, sub first and absolutely loved it and wore it basically ever day for a year. Just got the exp and it is just a fantastic every day watch, comfortable, looks great, etc. Had my sub on for a week on vacation and was itching to put the explorer back on I have similar sized wrist… if wearing for fun/casual, go sub. If for everyday work, etc go explorer. Or better yet, turn on the charm and talk them into selling you both and youll be all set! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 August 2022, 08:29 AM	#73
DoctorsOrders "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2020 Location: TN Watch: BLNR Posts: 876	Only way to really know is to go try it on!! If you have been offered it then they are more than likely in store, go and try both of them on and see which speaks to you

2 August 2022, 08:36 AM	#74
Wcdhtwn "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Houston Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2 Posts: 5,061	If the Explorer was still 39 it would be a more difficult choice. But at 36 my vote is Sub all the way.

2 August 2022, 10:22 AM	#75
Jefferyasher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: Ohio Posts: 361	a 14060m would be better sized, but I'd go with the sub between these two.

2 August 2022, 11:12 AM	#76
1995akcoop "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Maryland Posts: 2,162	36mm is just too small. Go with the Sub. None of us here dive anyways… well maybe a handful. Still, get the Sub Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2 August 2022, 11:06 PM	#77
chronical "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2021 Location: UK Watch: Tudor Black Bay 58 Posts: 15	I’ve same wrist size as you and I recently got to try on both. They’ll both fit your wrists but in different ways. I found the Explorer has a more classic and understated look whilst the Submariner has a more sporty and aggressive presence. You can’t go wrong with either, just depends on the look you’re going for!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)