The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 January 2010, 11:15 AM   #1
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by haitek View Post
Nah! I was really looking for a Gibson Super 400 CES but thanks anyway.....a
Here is one for $12,200.
Attached Images
 
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 11:21 AM   #2
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Here is a Custom L-5 CES.

This one is about 10 miles from me. Most of the brass jazz instruments are made in my area at Conn-Selmer (Elkhart Indiana).http://www.wwbw.com/Gibson-Custom-L-...-i1149441.wwbw
Attached Images
 
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 11:33 AM   #3
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Drsd

Very nice!!! But hey! I'll need money for strings and setup etc.,

Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
Here is a Custom L-5 CES.

This one is about 10 miles from me. Most of the brass jazz instruments are made in my area at Conn-Selmer (Elkhart Indiana).http://www.wwbw.com/Gibson-Custom-L-...-i1149441.wwbw
haitek is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 11:29 AM   #4
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
sweet.. I was at a pawn years ago and there was a guy pawning one and they were going to give him US500.. I told him I will give you 1200 .. He said no and that he was going to come back and get it in a week. I bet he did not go back
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 02:31 PM   #5
watchfinder
"TRF" Member
 
watchfinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: KENNETH
Location: WASHINGTON DC
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 48
you didn't buy it new. I knew it.
watchfinder is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 03:38 PM   #6
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
^^
They did some of the same to me. It is almost like they have a hidden agenda,,

In the end they said to old.. If that was the case, they should of known that long before what they did
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 03:43 PM   #7
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
^^
They did some of the same to me. It is almost like they have a hidden agenda,,

In the end they said to old.. If that was the case, they should of known that long before what they did
My point exactly. Why did they service me and not you. I told them....."Hey, I'm not a collector and I didn't have a problem with getting service in 95'." I also told them, "I completely trust Rolex with the watch and wouldn't hold them responsible for the dial during service and pressure testing." I also told them that the watch hadn't been opened since it had been serviced in Dallas by anyone. I think she was a bit shocked and didn't completely believe me when I told her that the bracelet was original.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 03:47 PM   #8
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
My point exactly. Why did they service me and not you. I told them....."Hey, I'm not a collector and I didn't have a problem with getting service in 95'." I also told them, "I completely trust Rolex with the watch and wouldn't hold them responsible for the dial during service and pressure testing."
they think everyone is up to something??
Well I did not tell don't worry about the dial... Maybe they were testing me to how I would react when I saw the pinched gasket

They told me they had concerns about being able to warnt the watch because dust from the dial could make its way into the movement. Far enough, but sell me a bracelet
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 03:52 PM   #9
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
they think everyone is up to something??
Well I did not tell don't worry about the dial... Maybe they were testing me to how I would react when I saw the pinched gasket

They told me they had concerns about being able to warnt the watch because dust from the dial could make its way into the movement. Far enough, but sell me a bracelet
They didn't even sell you a bracelet???? Thats bad.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 03:57 PM   #10
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Have you read part one of my thead here? http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=109294

Nope.. Over two hours with their agenda and no they would not sell me one.
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 04:10 PM   #11
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
Have you read part one of my thead here? http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=109294

Nope.. Over two hours with their agenda and no they would not sell me one.
I don't know what their decision was based on. Didn't they tell you? OHHH, they said it was a replica. Quote: "No such luck and one lady stated it was a replica." They would know. They are one of two places that could tell. As they say, the buck stops there. sorry man. If you want to go over their heads and are sure about the watch, I would contact NYCRSC and talk to a supervisor.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 04:15 PM   #12
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
At the end, it was watch to old and concerns about the movement. Said to check with AWCI. Much more to come in part 2.. I assume you read.. Yea, sure... two hours to tell me that. No need to do what they did if that was the case. Hidden agenda.. Part 2 to fill in some gaps.
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 04:22 PM   #13
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
At the end, it was watch to old and concerns about the movement. Said to check with AWCI. Much more to come in part 2.. I assume you read.. Yea, sure... two hours to tell me that. No need to do what they did if that was the case. Hidden agenda.. Part 2 to fill in some gaps.
Your watch also has a patina. I think Rolex wants the watch to look new when done and yours wouldn't look new with that patina. That still doesn't explain about the bracelet.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 04:24 PM   #14
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
^^
That should have been a two min no and go from there..
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 12 January 2010, 04:34 PM   #15
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
^^
That should have been a two min no and go from there..
If it were my watch and they told me it was a replica, I would have pitched a tent and camped there until I talked with the manager. Then I would have contacted NYC. If I didn't make any progress with them, I would have sent the watch to Geneva. Seriously, I would have.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 12:52 AM   #16
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
If it were my watch and they told me it was a replica, I would have pitched a tent and camped there until I talked with the manager. Then I would have contacted NYC. If I didn't make any progress with them, I would have sent the watch to Geneva. Seriously, I would have.
Ten years ago, I would be like you. However, I do not think any of that would get me a bracelet. I know the history of the watch and a few experts I have talked to indicated there is no evidence of such. BTW, Rolex does not use terms like replica. They say, not Rolex part. And I feel sorry for a person who purchases a good watch and gets false treatment from Rolex. Just like here on the boards, if someone is going to make a claim, they should state why and point out the issue. Rolex in my case will not tell. However, if I find any photos of my watch in a Rolex book or manual, I will be screaming from the roof tops… Now back on topic, this example of why Rolex is probably not the best place to go to confirm what a Rolex is. From my observation from my over two hour stressful visit is Rolex make watches. They service their watches; however anything watch that parts are no longer in production they are not experts. My feeling is they probably have very few if any watchmakers familiar with the details of 40-50 year old Rolex at their service center.
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 04:33 AM   #17
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
If it were my watch and they told me it was a replica, I would have pitched a tent and camped there until I talked with the manager. Then I would have contacted NYC. If I didn't make any progress with them, I would have sent the watch to Geneva. Seriously, I would have.
Now I'm at your stage.. I'm pissed... I went to put on a nato and guess what... They put a spring bar on that was not the one that was on the watch when I came in. It is a two stage on one side and thinner... Waiting for a call from the manager. They better make this right... Can you say
CaveDiver is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 11:07 AM   #18
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
OK, just received the pics from "haitek".

Here they are: ("haitek" please let me know if at some point you want the pictures removed and I will do so, the pictures are yours.)









bayerische is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 11:10 AM   #19
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Thanks for that bayerische!!! I don't know how you did that but I'm impressed


Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
OK, just received the pics from "haitek".

Here they are: ("haitek" please let me know if at some point you want the pictures removed and I will do so, the pictures are yours.)









haitek is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 11:14 AM   #20
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Quote:
Originally Posted by haitek View Post
Thanks for that bayerische!!! I don't know how you did that but I'm impressed
No problem mate, glad to be of assistance. Hopefully these pics will be of help.
bayerische is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 11:24 AM   #21
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
It looks like a Mark III dial from what I can see. The crystal is sooo scratched its hard to see it in full detail but the picture is awsome compared to before. I am still trying to reference the serial numbers and make sense of it. To your knowledge, the dial is original?


Here is another list for serial numbers from the Double Red Sea Dweller website:

Check the dial version with the serial. The usual and these are only guidelines since Rolex collecting has no hard rules.
Mark I Dial, 1.6-2.2 mil
Mark II Dial, 1.6-3.5 mil
Mark III Dial, 2.6-3.5 to 4.0 mil
Mark IV Dial, 3.0-5.2 mil

Its generally accepted by collectors that the DRSD were produced in the 1967-1977 range with the last batch in the 5.2 mil serials. While there might be some exception to the above, this is what is currently accepted by collectors..
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 11:30 AM   #22
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Drsd

Thanks again DadsWatch72!

Yes the dial is original. Hey! I'm trying to make sense of it too. The pictures are much better, many thanks to the kind gentleman in Finland for his help.....a

Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
It looks like a Mark III dial from what I can see. The crystal is sooo scratched its hard to see it in full detail but the picture is awsome compared to before. I am still trying to reference the serial numbers and make sense of it. To your knowledge, the dial is original?


Here is another list for serial numbers from the Double Red Sea Dweller website:

Check the dial version with the serial. The usual and these are only guidelines since Rolex collecting has no hard rules.
Mark I Dial, 1.6-2.2 mil
Mark II Dial, 1.6-3.5 mil
Mark III Dial, 2.6-3.5 to 4.0 mil
Mark IV Dial, 3.0-5.2 mil

Its generally accepted by collectors that the DRSD were produced in the 1967-1977 range with the last batch in the 5.2 mil serials. While there might be some exception to the above, this is what is currently accepted by collectors..
haitek is offline  
Old 14 January 2010, 09:42 AM   #23
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Drsd

Hey DadsWatch72!

Thanks for your time and information. The picture you posted of the centre of the dial is identical to the dial I have here with the D in DWELLER above and slightly to the right of the R in SUBMARINER.
I had a gentleman visit me yesterday with books galore (and a nice early 60's submariner and a few others). We could find no reference to the actual watch in his book of prices but he had a book of Rolex Sports Watches and 'lo and behold' there was a picture of it on the front slip cover. He seemed to think it was genuine but didn't want to make me an offer just yet. I'm starting to visualise that Gibson Super 400 CES....Yay!
haitek is offline  
Old 14 January 2010, 10:10 AM   #24
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by haitek View Post
Hey DadsWatch72!

Thanks for your time and information. The picture you posted of the centre of the dial is identical to the dial I have here with the D in DWELLER above and slightly to the right of the R in SUBMARINER.
I had a gentleman visit me yesterday with books galore (and a nice early 60's submariner and a few others). We could find no reference to the actual watch in his book of prices but he had a book of Rolex Sports Watches and 'lo and behold' there was a picture of it on the front slip cover. He seemed to think it was genuine but didn't want to make me an offer just yet. I'm starting to visualise that Gibson Super 400 CES....Yay!
There are some things that don't make sense to some experts on these watches. In paticular, the serial number doesn't go with that dial. They would have to re-write the book on serial number associations if this is genuine. You said that you bought it new in the early seventys and the dial hasn't been changed so........its perplexing. It would be good to have the crystal removed and allow the dial to be viewed without all of the distortion. You could always take it to an Authorized Dealer and ask them to verify it. They might even service it since the dial appears to be in good condition (its hard to tell though). The hands would probably be replaced by Rolex. If you didn't want them to replace the hands, they might not service you. This is only speculation on my part. I have no idea what Rolex would say, but those are my thoughts.
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 14 January 2010, 12:55 PM   #25
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Drsd

Since finding out more about the watch, I too am perplexed. When the watch was serviced by Rolex in Sydney in the 80's, they only charged me for a service, no mention of changing the hands, dial or any other part of the watch was mentioned. No charge was made for any changes to the hardware, I just trusted them to take care of it, they did, so I was happy at the time. I was unaware of their 'modus operandi' then, as now. I'm considering re-listing the watch on ebay with a $20K reserve just to see what happens. I've numerous offers for the watch and would be happy to get that (or more). Any serious offers will be carefully considered.............a
haitek is offline  
Old 14 January 2010, 04:42 AM   #26
DadsWatch72
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by DadsWatch72 View Post
It looks like a Mark III dial from what I can see. The crystal is sooo scratched its hard to see it in full detail but the picture is awsome compared to before. I am still trying to reference the serial numbers and make sense of it. To your knowledge, the dial is original?


Here is another list for serial numbers from the Double Red Sea Dweller website:

Check the dial version with the serial. The usual and these are only guidelines since Rolex collecting has no hard rules.
Mark I Dial, 1.6-2.2 mil
Mark II Dial, 1.6-3.5 mil
Mark III Dial, 2.6-3.5 to 4.0 mil
Mark IV Dial, 3.0-5.2 mil

Its generally accepted by collectors that the DRSD were produced in the 1967-1977 range with the last batch in the 5.2 mil serials. While there might be some exception to the above, this is what is currently accepted by collectors..
I have posted it on another forum that deals with vintage to get some more info on the watch and see if its possible that the dial was sold with a case in the 1.7 million range. The crystal is so scratched that it distorts the dial somewhat but it looks like its a Mark III to me, and it looks genuine in my limited experience.
Attached Images
   
DadsWatch72 is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 12:09 PM   #27
mlehman
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nowhere
Posts: 283
Abi,

do you have any CD`s of your bluesy stuff?
If I bough that watch I would let it just as it is..cool history behind it
Mike
mlehman is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 12:45 PM   #28
haitek
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: haitek futur
Location: Happiesville
Watch: Citizen quartz ;-)
Posts: 120
Da Blues

Hey mlehman!

Thanks for your comments. Yes that's one reason I didn't have the watch 'restored', it has a interesting history with me. I need to sell the watch and then I'll have the cash to promote my music.
I don't have a CD as yet. I've been in the studio for the last five years, experimenting and putting stuff together. I've probably got enough blues recorded to make a CD (and a heap of other stuff) If you send me your email address I'll keep you posted. My email address is [email protected]
Regards................a


Quote:
Originally Posted by mlehman View Post
Abi,

do you have any CD`s of your bluesy stuff?
If I bough that watch I would let it just as it is..cool history behind it
Mike
haitek is offline  
Old 13 January 2010, 01:04 PM   #29
mlehman
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nowhere
Posts: 283
Thanks..email is [email protected]

I`ve been listening to David Gilmore and Roger waters stuff lately.
mlehman is offline  
Old 14 January 2010, 01:23 PM   #30
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Haitek,
Was the 80's the last time you had the watch serviced? Does it still run and keep time?
thanks
CaveDiver is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.