The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 December 2010, 10:26 PM   #1
Tachymeter
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 82
I am glad that Rolex offer a 41mm Date Just. Anything below 40mm seems slightly feminine to me.
Tachymeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 01:35 AM   #2
rolexertion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
I have seen oversized watches, (more than 42mm), on a fair number of guys. It always seems to me that they are unsure of something about themselves and are posing with this piece of hardware instead of just wearing a watch. It's not a look I would want.
rolexertion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 02:11 AM   #3
Rolesor
"TRF" Member
 
Rolesor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: 116234
Posts: 4,150
Nope! In fact I opted for the original DJ over the larger DJ II.
__________________
116234 - Blue Concentric Dial - Fluted Bezel - Oyster Bracelet

Tudor Black Bay 54 - Rubber Strap
Rolesor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 05:24 AM   #4
baxta69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
Its all relative. When I wear my DJ for a while then put on the sub, the sub feels huge by comparison. Likewise my Breitling is a veritable monster. I must admit I like the classic 36mm of the DJ even tho I have big wrists. Its somehow more refined
baxta69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 09:56 AM   #5
Wildwing
"TRF" Member
 
Wildwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 593
Men used to wear ties that were about half a foot wide. We got over it. We'll also get over the manhole-size watch craze, and the 36 to 40 mm Rolex watches will look just fine, once again.
Wildwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 10:11 AM   #6
MY-WATCH
"TRF" Member
 
MY-WATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,782
for me 40 mm rolex is perfect
MY-WATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 06:51 PM   #7
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
36-40 is a great size for me. The trend is larger and it looks like the trend is here to stay. But for me 36-40 is in the zone. Guess I'm not very trendy.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 07:44 PM   #8
nowzen
"TRF" Member
 
nowzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
No, Rolex are not too small.
Panerai are too big.

Can't wait till this oversized watch fad dies.

nowzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 08:40 PM   #9
Minutehand
"TRF" Member
 
Minutehand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AE
Location: Right here
Posts: 294
I like larger size watches, but only on occasion and not for regular wear. I have a number of watches larger than 42mm, the largest being a 48mm flieger, which I can wear for an evening out, but then it gets too "in the way" and definately not practical for work wear.

Smaller than 36mm looks a bit too small on my wrist.....

Bottom line is that 36-40mm is the ideal "all round" size for comfort, practicality and continuous wear. While it is on your wrist with some presence, you are not aware of it all the time.

Have a great day all and .... merry Christmas
Minutehand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 12:13 AM   #10
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by nowzen View Post
No, Rolex are not too small.
Panerai are too big.

Can't wait till this oversized watch fad dies.

It's not a fad.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 01:41 AM   #11
nowzen
"TRF" Member
 
nowzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
Quote:
Originally Posted by karmatp View Post
It's not a fad.
Right... time will tell.
nowzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 05:18 AM   #12
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
I find the 36 mm too small for my wrists.....................but the 40 mm models are sheer perfection!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 07:31 AM   #13
Warnsboy
"TRF" Member
 
Warnsboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
Even my 36mm DJ is perfect. All my Rolex are too nice to feel small.
Warnsboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 10:14 PM   #14
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
Have you tried the Datejust II?

At 41mm it wears nice. I always admired the 36mm DJ but was just too small for my tastes. 39 - 42mm seems to work perfectly for me.
I've owned many Panerai as well but I think the size is what always made me sell. But PAMS are supposed to be big, so Its just a matter of personal taste.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 11:29 PM   #15
Nacelle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cascadia
Posts: 300
Rolex are just the "right " size... The PAM 44 or 47 cases are just the right size...

Each high end manufacturer finds, dwells and prospers in their own niche... you either like it or you don't.

I don't think that the "large" watch is going to go the way of the dodo bird any time soon at all. Personally, I like my Rolex, Panerai, IWC and Patek, all different sizes...equally.

I can't imagine a 47 case on a Rolex...
Nacelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 December 2010, 11:38 PM   #16
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
40mm is perfect.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 12:06 AM   #17
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Rolex future offerings will arrive at Basel in 42mm range, maybe new Daytona?
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 05:48 AM   #18
Rolexcess
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Rey
Location: South Carolina
Watch: it, Sucka!
Posts: 253
40mm is perfect; anything larger looks too gangsta/stupid.
Rolexcess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 06:06 AM   #19
manandjoe
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 36
I have a sub that I wear on and of for the past twenty years. When I got it it was considered larger. I have a IWC 18k dress watch that is about 33mm and thin as paper that was inherited. About a year ago I purchased a PAM 111 and thought the rolex was small.

The truth of the matter is this the IWC I thought looked like a kids watch but the size is really pretty good. The PAM at 44mm is really a joke. The 40mm sub and the new GMT IIc maxi case is perfect. Its all perception but the truth is the Rolex offers perfect comfort. Than I got to think that the manual wind IWC engineering and eligance is something. Whats going on in the PAM thats 44mm 16mm high case.... nothing. Now the DSSD is a hand cuff thats out of balance.
manandjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 December 2010, 08:08 AM   #20
steve1985
"TRF" Member
 
steve1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: ohio
Posts: 160
I wear a 36mm oyster perpetual date. I sometimes wish it was a little bigger.
steve1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 02:18 PM   #21
Tony G
"TRF" Member
 
Tony G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NYC
Watch: GMT
Posts: 235
36mm In my opinion is perfect up to 8 inch wrist.
Tony G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 02:25 PM   #22
artbell5
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: norcal
Posts: 27
i used to wear an Omega SMP full size. after switching to an EXP ll the Omega feels like a giant lump of lead on my wrist.
artbell5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 02:30 PM   #23
johnbeth
"TRF" Member
 
johnbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
Been wearing my YMII monster and when I wore my WG Daytona, it felt like it never existed on my wrist. Even when I wore a WG Daytona with bracelet it still felt small.
johnbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 03:43 PM   #24
superdelsol
"TRF" Member
 
superdelsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
This one is not too small for me, and at 34mm, it's the smallest modern men's Rolex. For my size and taste, 34mm-36mm is perfect for a dress watch, and 40-42mm are perfect for a sport watch. I'm 5'7" with a 7.5" wrist.

__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986
superdelsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 04:42 PM   #25
threemonkeys
"TRF" Member
 
threemonkeys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Craig
Location: Seattle-ish, USA
Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc
Posts: 7,022
My 34mm and 41mm watches are perfect for me. I don't quite get the trend of wearing a big hubcap on one's wrist. It makes me think that the wearer might be compensating for some...shall we say, shortcoming.
threemonkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2011, 04:44 PM   #26
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Perfectly happy with my (sold DD36mm) and current DJ(36mm).
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 03:13 PM   #27
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
Practicability surely has to enter the discussion somewhere. If you have a large broad wrist then you will 'carry' a bigger watch with ease. A large watch flopping around on a smaller wrist is a bit of a nuisance (IMHO) and falls into the category of jewellery - like a big chunky bracelet - and can be a hazard in day to day life.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 03:17 PM   #28
boogiebot
"TRF" Member
 
boogiebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
i use to think and feel that Rolex at 40 mm was just way too small. till i saw the new subc. previously all the watches i owned were 44 and up. now everything i own is no larger than 44. but for an all around everyday/occasion watch the 40mm subc is perfect!

so on that note....no i dont think that Rolex's are too small. and this is coming from a former Rolex hater, now convert
boogiebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 03:44 PM   #29
leerecords
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: 16610
Posts: 43
Icon17 Rolex's too small?

My cousin got married and received a Curtis & Co watch as a gift. Her and her husband didn't want the watch and gave the watch to me. I don't really wear it as it's ridiculously big. Although, when I wear it it's always a conversation piece. Comments I received are, "That's like a saucer on your wrist." & "That's the biggest watch I've ever seen."

It dwarfs my Rolex's...
Attached Images
 

Last edited by leerecords; 2 July 2011 at 03:47 PM.. Reason: Rotate Picture
leerecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 03:56 PM   #30
Atomant
"TRF" Member
 
Atomant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
I'd say depending on the size of your wrist???
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80
Atomant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.