ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Daytona-Dan · 24 June 2013, 07:11 AM

Everyone says the Daytona's flaw is the lack of date but I really don't mind. It has an excellent movement, beautiful dial, extremely comfortable and looks awesome overall. The only flaw in my mind is how easy it is to scratch the bezel and the first few really stick out. After a year or so, you can look past the scratches and love it for what it is: An excellent and beautiful watch! I'm not 100% sold on the ceramic but it's growing on me slowly and it obviously fixes the main flaw for me. Will wait and see.

My SS SubC is pretty much flawless in my eyes. It takes a beating and still looks like new. Though not really a problem, I'd say the caseback thickness makes it sit quite high compared to the Daytona. The dial is simple (which is nice) but sometimes I feel like I want a little more from it but I guess that's why I also have the Daytona?

chemistryde · 24 June 2013, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daytona-Dan

Everyone says the Daytona's flaw is the lack of date but I really don't mind. It has an excellent movement, beautiful dial, extremely comfortable and looks awesome overall. The only flaw in my mind is how easy it is to scratch the bezel and the first few really stick out. After a year or so, you can look past the scratches and love it for what it is: An excellent and beautiful watch! I'm no t100% sold on the ceramic but it's growing on me slowly and if obviously fixes the main flaw for me. Will wait and see.

My SS SubC is pretty much flawless in my eyes. It takes a beating and still looks like new. Though not really a problem, I'd say the caseback thickness makes it sit quite high compared to the Daytona. The dial is simple (which is nice) but sometimes I feel like I want a little more from it but I guess that's why I have the Daytona?

Agree with everything you wrote!

accurate · 24 June 2013, 08:31 AM

I haven't found anything about my SD that I don't like, but I do like the newer style Glidelock clasp more...does that count?

mruhland31 · 24 June 2013, 08:55 AM

I love everything about my 116610. I love it. There is nothing and I mean nothing I don't like...every day I wear this I fall in love all over again. In my mind its perfect

24 June 2013, 07:11 AM	#91
Daytona-Dan Banned Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Dan Location: UK Watch: 116528 Posts: 1,049	Everyone says the Daytona's flaw is the lack of date but I really don't mind. It has an excellent movement, beautiful dial, extremely comfortable and looks awesome overall. The only flaw in my mind is how easy it is to scratch the bezel and the first few really stick out. After a year or so, you can look past the scratches and love it for what it is: An excellent and beautiful watch! I'm not 100% sold on the ceramic but it's growing on me slowly and it obviously fixes the main flaw for me. Will wait and see. My SS SubC is pretty much flawless in my eyes. It takes a beating and still looks like new. Though not really a problem, I'd say the caseback thickness makes it sit quite high compared to the Daytona. The dial is simple (which is nice) but sometimes I feel like I want a little more from it but I guess that's why I also have the Daytona?

24 June 2013, 08:31 AM	#93
accurate Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: North Carolina Posts: 31	I haven't found anything about my SD that I don't like, but I do like the newer style Glidelock clasp more...does that count?

24 June 2013, 08:55 AM	#94
mruhland31 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Santa Clarita CA Posts: 1,028	I love everything about my 116610. I love it. There is nothing and I mean nothing I don't like...every day I wear this I fall in love all over again. In my mind its perfect

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)