The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 November 2012, 10:01 AM   #1
justicepool
"TRF" Member
 
justicepool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 116610LN, 16613
Posts: 111
I prefer the look of the no date version, or the date without the cyclops.
justicepool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 10:55 AM   #2
FNFZ4
2024 Pledge Member
 
FNFZ4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
the benefit would be the date right?
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE!

Watches:
Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi

Wish list:
Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130
FNFZ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 11:15 AM   #3
honeybear
"TRF" Member
 
honeybear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Vacheron Overseas
Posts: 297
The cyclops is very much part of the public persona of a Rolex, so the Submariner Date is much more recognizable as a Rolex, whether that is a benefit depends on your priorities. For me, I like the no date version, since only Rolex connoisseurs seem to have them. It's not to say that WIS don't buy the Sub Date as well, but the buyers who know nothing about watches and are only buying Rolex for the brand will invariably choose the Sub Date over the No Date.
__________________
Patek Philippe Calatrava 5119J; Vacheron Constantin Overseas; Jaeger-LeCoultre Grande Reverso Duo; Rolex Submariner 114060; Baume and Mercier Hampton Annual Calendar; Tudor Heritage Black Bay.
honeybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 08:38 PM   #4
chris2000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 21
It will be a better investment than the date model Submariner because dealers typically order the nominally more expensive 'date' version.
chris2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 08:58 PM   #5
seadog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Peter
Location: Perth
Posts: 176
I really do prefer on a 40mm Rolex to be a no date model.

The date & cyclops make the face look too busy & crowded to me
__________________
Grand Seiko GMT - SBGJ237
seadog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 09:03 PM   #6
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
I need the date and rather like the cyclop on the crystal so I got the Sub date. I have two both with date.
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 09:43 PM   #7
al_bongo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
Straight forward choice these days between the sub and sub date. Previously with the 14060M there was a bit more to consider especially when compared to the 11610.

Personal choice really. The earth doesn't stop turning just because you don't have a date on your watch.
al_bongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2012, 10:28 PM   #8
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Hmmm...... let me think about that one.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2012, 11:32 PM   #9
Arch Stanton
"TRF" Member
 
Arch Stanton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcan View Post
Hmmm...... let me think about that one.
Great picture, easy decision for me................. the one on the right without the blob on the crystal
Arch Stanton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2012, 04:21 AM   #10
al_bongo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
Good choice.
al_bongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2012, 02:17 PM   #11
SUBversive
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
My further research indicates that - well this may be from the rumor mill, but the new sub will have a sapphire case back with the date in the back. This will be the best of both worlds also making the watch reversible.
SUBversive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2012, 05:57 PM   #12
kymwatchlog
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 853
for me, it seems harder to clean the xtal with the cyclops. don't like the way the dust gathers around it.

other than that, i repsect the fact that the cyclops being a rolex heritage.
kymwatchlog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2012, 11:00 PM   #13
TARDIS
"TRF" Member
 
TARDIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Queensland, AUST
Posts: 2,003
I get up in the morning and the first thing I do is watch the news. The day and date is clearly shown and announced. I read the paper most days, so here we have the day and DATE. Like most other folks I carry a cell with the day and the DATE displayed each time I use it.

If I cannot retain what day or DATE it is during my waking hours, I would be very worried.

Checking with your Rolex date is just making your brain stagnant.

I have learned to live a happy life sans the date on my watch
Attached Images
 
TARDIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2012, 02:19 AM   #14
jonathan17
"TRF" Member
 
jonathan17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: jon
Location: Singapore
Watch: ??? Yes please!
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by TARDIS View Post
I get up in the morning and the first thing I do is watch the news. The day and date is clearly shown and announced. I read the paper most days, so here we have the day and DATE. Like most other folks I carry a cell with the day and the DATE displayed each time I use it.

If I cannot retain what day or DATE it is during my waking hours, I would be very worried.

Checking with your Rolex date is just making your brain stagnant.

I have learned to live a happy life sans the date on my watch

Great looking Explorer, hopefully this will be my next rolex, for now the submariner is keeping me company


jonathan17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 November 2012, 11:07 PM   #15
Grey.Coupe
"TRF" Member
 
Grey.Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
When I was working, the date was handy; signing/dating things. Now that I am retired, I use both day and date...
Grey.Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2012, 12:41 AM   #16
Ageing Orphan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: U.K The Midlands
Posts: 237
I much prefer the ND version and will begin saving for it in the new year. I can't see the date even WITH my glasses on now without having to stare and focus by moving my left arm away from my eyes so it is a bit of a waste for me.
Ageing Orphan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2012, 02:38 AM   #17
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
For me it's simply clean dial vs necessity of date function.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 November 2012, 02:51 AM   #18
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
I've had several different Rolex models with the date and find that I wear my 14060 more than any of the others..I prefer the no date..
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.