ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 April 2016, 12:34 PM | #91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
|
Quote:
|
|
1 April 2016, 12:44 PM | #92 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
I tried on a 39mm SS Dual Time and had to have it. If the missus wasn't standing there, I probably would have bought it. It's still a goal, though I believe it's now discontinued. Beautiful watch. I wouldn't dive it or change the oil in my truck with it, but for the office it would get a lot of wrist time. |
|
1 April 2016, 12:56 PM | #93 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Steve
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/VC
Posts: 2,157
|
I know that VC is part of the classic trinity, but think that when it comes to popularity and desirability Rolex seems to be a better fit, especially on this forum.
I do have a VC Overseas Chronograph and an AP ROC and love them both. I know the WR and antimagnetic ratings are higher on the VC, but as far as durability goes, I haven't really had a problem with either and wear them both a lot. Of course the movements are the same so I guess any durability difference would be in the case. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 April 2016, 01:00 PM | #94 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
|
|
1 April 2016, 01:03 PM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SS
Posts: 137
|
I prefer Rolex. Better service center experience.
|
1 April 2016, 01:17 PM | #96 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
|
1 April 2016, 01:41 PM | #97 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Auburn, AL
Watch: Rolex, Tudor
Posts: 1,139
|
|
1 April 2016, 01:43 PM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
|
1 April 2016, 01:51 PM | #99 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I love my AP
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
1 April 2016, 02:14 PM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
|
1 April 2016, 04:30 PM | #101 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
|
Ok let us see what is the best resale value rolex any objections??
|
1 April 2016, 04:34 PM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
|
Ok Ap fanboys list for me Ap innovation. 2- list for me rolex innovation. You will know who's best.
|
1 April 2016, 04:42 PM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
1 April 2016, 04:54 PM | #104 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
Quote:
...then you also get to the point in collecting where personal satisfaction matters more than resale and you'll take a $10k+ loss to really enjoy a watch. Like ALS, FP Journe, Richard Mille, etc. although these can all be purchased at the right price. |
|
1 April 2016, 05:07 PM | #105 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
|
|
1 April 2016, 05:13 PM | #106 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 306
|
While I might not know much about watches, I certainly do not disrespect them like you do here. like many others on this forum, I own both APs and Rolexes and I find that they are different watches for different occasions. It seems like the only fanboy here is you. That's not necessary a bad thing, but do give other Watch companies (not just AP) a proper respect they deserve.
|
1 April 2016, 05:15 PM | #107 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Home
Watch: AP
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
|
|
1 April 2016, 05:22 PM | #108 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
|
Quote:
Leap year indicator Skeleton Master of the minite repeater that Patek even worked with. List goes on but I don't feel like google searching right now Where is Rolex when it comes to tourbillions, minute repeaters, perpetual calendar chronos, split minute chronos, skeletons, equation of time, dual balance movements, Etc. not to mention the movements that come out of APRP? The comparison of base APs and all Rolexes are similar but from a brand standpoint AP history and complications are far above Rolex. I love Rolex for what they are but a AP grande comp can never be compared to a Rolex. |
|
1 April 2016, 05:50 PM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 40
|
I think its over-stepping the mark to suggest Rolex is number 1/the best watchmaker out there or that Rolex is better than AP.
Rolex is a very good watchmaker and is a benchmark by which status and luxury are judged by in the watchmaking world (whether people like it or not). However, having said that, it is a benchmark and there are watches that are significantly better than the benchmark. I recall reading somewhere that traditionally, the top watchmaking houses are Patek, VC and AP and that you could throw JLC, ALS, FPJ and Greubel Forsey into the mix as well. There are watches that are outside the above 'magic circle' that i think most people would agree are considerably better than Rolex, such as Breguet (to name one). Again, its not to say Rolex is rubbish - its not; its fantastic. But just like there are Merc Benz C Class and E Classes out there that are nice cars, there are also Rolls Royces, Lambos, Paganis, Ferraris, Bugattis and Koenigseggs. Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk |
1 April 2016, 05:56 PM | #110 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
|
Who says I don't respect other watch brand I respect them all but when coming to speak and justify brand is not disrespect it's tilling the truth about it. And for rolex innovation check out wiki and you will see why rolex rocks. 2- when ever I went to a seller and ask for their opinion about perches a brand they always recommend rolex. In terms of resale value, quality, reliability. All brands are good but this is the truth they said. If they had Ap or Pp they will have hard time to sell it back again. What also they say is when for example too watches come to the store Ap and rolex I will first buy the rolex because I know it not sit for a while on the shelf but with other is not the same. What do you think about that?
|
1 April 2016, 06:15 PM | #111 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 306
|
If I misunderstood you, I apologize. Your first post about Rolex being able to crap on AP anytime they want led me to believe that way.
Each retailer/ad have different stories when they want to push a sale. I wouldn't give it much thought unless you do your due diligence and found it to be true. And regarding the watch being on the shelves, it really depends on the models. If you are talking about a submariner, Daytona or BLNR, of course it won't be at the AD for long. However, when it comes to other unpopular like celini models or PM, trust me, it could be on that shelve for long. Somethings with AP, if you are looking for the 15202, chances are it's not on the shelve, but if you are looking for millenary, it's gonna be there! |
1 April 2016, 06:29 PM | #112 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: down by the river
Posts: 4,926
|
Rolex and AP have very different value propositions
Rolex is known for its classic bracelets and oyster cases, and also reliability and durability. We can assume Rolex manufacturing is mostly automated, and it's not attempting to be haute horlogerie. Meanwhile AP offers hand finished movements, often with display casebacks. With the royal oak, you also have a distinctive case and bracelet design. AP plays in a higher price range. calling it "better" depends whether or not the customer cares about movement finishing. Many Rolex customers care about case, bracelet, clasp, dial, bezel, and reliable timekeeping, but don't care too much about how much handiwork went into the movement. In fact I am probably closer to the Rolex camp on this issue. Many AP (and PP, ALS, RM etc.) customers take the opposite view |
1 April 2016, 06:32 PM | #113 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: SS
Posts: 137
|
|
1 April 2016, 06:33 PM | #114 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Home
Watch: AP
Posts: 253
|
They are all coming down to common senses.
Those seller recommend Rolex watches because they will have easier time selling them. They don't have to talk much about the watch itself, most buyer probably have known or heard about Rolex. No offensive but i'm doubt every kid in McDonald can write a paragraph about Rolex with two words 'expensive' and 'rich' in the title. If they have enough money sooner or later, they will definitely buy a Rolex first hand Rolex is one of the most popular brands in the planet. AP/ PP is not as well known, as Rolex by general public, but it is considered to be even more exclusive by the people who know it. AP or PP is something i would buy after several basic watches like Rolex, Tudor |
1 April 2016, 06:40 PM | #115 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
|
|
1 April 2016, 07:00 PM | #116 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
|
At the end what I want to say is both rolex and Ap are same league you can't go wrong with. both are great watches both have advantage and disadvantaged you can't say one is better than another. Even rolex and Ap both they know that they compet with each other. No one is higher level than the other. people who do this level things. Not watch makers. It's all about your taste who do this level things.
|
1 April 2016, 07:02 PM | #117 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Bob
Location: NJ
Watch: Less each year...
Posts: 464
|
I like both brands and product offerings from both foe completely different reasons. Rolex is a haute gamme and AP is haute horlogerie.
__________________
_____________________________________________ Audemars Piguet - Blancpain - Damasko - Grand Seiko - Rolex |
1 April 2016, 07:06 PM | #118 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 273
|
I dare Ap, rolex or any high end watch maker says in public that there watch is better than the other. But my point of view rolex is the best because like some of you who says that even children know the rolex brand. It's like a ferrari most of kids know it
|
1 April 2016, 07:19 PM | #119 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
Moreover, although Rolex is good, it is definitely not the best. Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk |
|
1 April 2016, 07:26 PM | #120 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Gerald
Location: Okinawa
Watch: Seiko Black Monste
Posts: 123
|
I have huge respect for AP and their designs. I just cannot get over the fact of how much they remind me of an erector set.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.