Defending the Rolex Brand & the Men Who Wear It

[Watch This]

Originally Posted by BristolCavendish

Wow. The witch hunt is finally on amongst those who obviously missed the point(s). Whether you found these accounts totally ludicrous (or even believable) is somewhat immaterial when compared to the actual the crux of the opening posts. Concerns regarding (1) the disposition of expensive timepieces in the event of a divorce; (2) clarification of water resistance testing; (3) the appropriateness of dressing a corpse in jewelry (or a watch); (4) the unnatural practice of extending a childhood nursing period; and (5) the contempt of various 'man-haters' towards successful male Rolex wearers are common curiosities/events and the follow-up posts provided by various forum members added both insights as well as constructive information to those interested in getting to the bottom of things. Perhaps the key here is the ability to differentiate between an obvious 'troll' post and a provocative one that raises questions of general interest.

Common sense dictates that if one suspects a trolling endeavor, it is often best not to respond at all. On the other hand, everyone is entitled to an opinion and thus, we have discussion forums of various kinds.

I'm all in with the concept of giving you more rope.

[zama]

hahaha it has been a while.

[GB-man]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uiPDu6fRZBQ/maxresdefault.jpg

They're evolving

[ronricks]

Originally Posted by BristolCavendish

Wow. The witch hunt is finally on amongst those who obviously missed the point(s). Whether you found these accounts totally ludicrous (or even believable) is somewhat immaterial when compared to the actual the crux of the opening posts. Concerns regarding (1) the disposition of expensive timepieces in the event of a divorce; (2) clarification of water resistance testing; (3) the appropriateness of dressing a corpse in jewelry (or a watch); (4) the unnatural practice of extending a childhood nursing period; and (5) the contempt of various 'man-haters' towards successful male Rolex wearers are common curiosities/events and the follow-up posts provided by various forum members added both insights as well as constructive information to those interested in getting to the bottom of things. Perhaps the key here is the ability to differentiate between an obvious 'troll' post and a provocative one that raises questions of general interest.

Common sense dictates that if one suspects a trolling endeavor, it is often best not to respond at all. On the other hand, everyone is entitled to an opinion and thus, we have discussion forums of various kinds.

Bristol I don't think you did anything too out of line we have some real prudes on here. I have seen much worse at company parties with open bars. Architecture Firm I worked for had real extravagant Holiday parties. Witnessed a drunk associate run the length of the ballroom and spear tackle another co-worker who was "dancing with his wife too close". The next year my boss physically choked a co-worker on the dance floor for dancing with one of the young interns he had an eye for. Neither were fired. Stuff like this happens when unlimited alcohol is involved.

[visualplane]

clearly a troll, no one talks like that except mr peanut

[BristolCavendish]

Originally Posted by visualplane

clearly a troll, no one talks like that except mr peanut

Interesting. A troll-like response from a troll-accuser. So what else is going on in your world?