ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Watcheroo · 7 June 2017, 02:32 PM

Definitely the 15202. It's one of the rare keepers in my opinion

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mmancari · 7 June 2017, 06:52 PM

Yep 202! Something odd when looking at the scale of the tiny date window on the 400. The 202 is perfect!

sirish19 · 8 June 2017, 03:15 AM

I also wrestled with this dilemma but ultimately ended up going with the 202 just like you did. Once I got it on the wrist, it was a clear winner. I love the charm of the size, slimness and iconic features of the original. The lack of second hand also makes it a very clean and refined dial. Very very different from the ROO chronograph and compliments yours well.

I also love the depth of the color and the fact that it does play with different lighting (like the Nautilus does).

I just happened to be wearing mine with a light blue suit and slightly darker blue socks and found it striking how the light could make it match either.

Great choice and wear it in good health!

Chadridv · 8 June 2017, 03:23 AM

superb! Congrats

8 June 2017, 03:15 AM	#93
sirish19 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: Stephen Location: Tokyo Watch: PP-VC-AP Posts: 1,003	I also wrestled with this dilemma but ultimately ended up going with the 202 just like you did. Once I got it on the wrist, it was a clear winner. I love the charm of the size, slimness and iconic features of the original. The lack of second hand also makes it a very clean and refined dial. Very very different from the ROO chronograph and compliments yours well. I also love the depth of the color and the fact that it does play with different lighting (like the Nautilus does). I just happened to be wearing mine with a light blue suit and slightly darker blue socks and found it striking how the light could make it match either. Great choice and wear it in good health! Attached Images __________________

8 June 2017, 03:23 AM	#94
Chadridv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chadri Location: LI, NY Watch: 116610LV Posts: 11,357	superb! Congrats __________________ - i͞n͟s͞t͟a͞g͞r͟a͞m͞ @ⓒⓄⓁⒹⓒⒶⓈⒺⓦⒶⒶⓉⒸⒽⒺⓈ

7 June 2017, 02:32 PM	#91
Watcheroo 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: USA Posts: 3,927	Definitely the 15202. It's one of the rare keepers in my opinion Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

7 June 2017, 06:52 PM	#92
mmancari "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: MichaelMancari Location: Los Angeles Watch: Ap Diver 5513Rolex Posts: 119	Yep 202! Something odd when looking at the scale of the tiny date window on the 400. The 202 is perfect!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)