ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 March 2017, 10:20 PM | #121 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
|
|
22 March 2017, 10:21 PM | #122 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
If anyone wants an SD4K, last time I visited my AD, they had 2 in the case.
|
22 March 2017, 10:22 PM | #123 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
|
Looks good to me!
|
22 March 2017, 10:22 PM | #124 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Robear
Location: Come and Take It!
Watch: 126710 BLRO
Posts: 1,632
|
Wait is this just the DSSD case w/o the Ring Lock?
|
22 March 2017, 10:23 PM | #125 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
|
Hate it....like really don't like it all. Some will which is good for them but not the watch for me.
|
22 March 2017, 10:23 PM | #126 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
My next prediction is a lot of smaller wristed people asking if the new SD is too big on them. The answer will most likely be yes
|
22 March 2017, 10:24 PM | #127 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
|
|
22 March 2017, 10:24 PM | #128 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: New York
Watch: 16570, 14060M
Posts: 379
|
Too big. 43mm is a massive watch.
|
22 March 2017, 10:25 PM | #129 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 397
|
Not keen on the size but I can understand it to some extent. Lots of people complained the the sd4000 should have gone up a size to fill the gap between the Sub and the dssd. The red is nice, too.
BUT A CYCLOPS?????!!!! SERIOUSLY? On a SEA Dweller????? Oh, for crying out loud!!!!!! Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.... |
22 March 2017, 10:25 PM | #130 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: MEL.
Posts: 20
|
Cyclops. On a freaking Sea-Dweller. Hell NO.
|
22 March 2017, 10:26 PM | #131 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 20
|
Why on earth have they put a cyclops on it??? The whole idea of the SD and DSSD not having cyclops was so that the watch could be used safely for saturation diving! The watches' intended purpose for crying out loud. That's why they have a helium escape valve!
I hate it, big time. |
22 March 2017, 10:26 PM | #132 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hungary
Watch: an extinct 116600
Posts: 119
|
I think the thickness is the same as the "old" 116600.
If so then it's a winner, hands-down, imho. |
22 March 2017, 10:29 PM | #133 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
|
22 March 2017, 10:30 PM | #134 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Derek
Location: st louis
Watch: Sd4000
Posts: 518
|
Im sure glad I have my sd4000 the ultimate tool watch
|
22 March 2017, 10:33 PM | #135 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 546
|
Beautiful watchcase, love the red line.
Pity those 3 mm = Too big !!! & Pity Black, gloss finish Dial. Love my 116600 even more !!! 40 mm & Satin Black Dial. |
22 March 2017, 10:37 PM | #136 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
|
Nice watch but would love to know the thickness. I could of done without the cyclops. Liking the red font.
|
22 March 2017, 10:39 PM | #137 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: God Bless Texas
Watch: Smurf, DD40, SkyD.
Posts: 1,517
|
Awesome!! They finally make a sport watch for those who appreciate a larger size, but without the terrible looking ring inside like the DSSD. The red font is killer as well.
|
22 March 2017, 10:42 PM | #138 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
|
Sea Dweller 4000
2014-2017 "The unpopular kid on the block" RIP Note: If Rolex did indeed discon 40mm, it's probably the shortest production modern Rolex in history. Market since Q3 2014 and ended Q1 2017, about 30 months. Even the Explorer 1 214270 "short hand" released in 2010 only updated in 2016, bearing same model number but with longer hands and lumed 3,6,9. |
22 March 2017, 10:42 PM | #139 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
|
I like it and the size is right.
|
22 March 2017, 10:46 PM | #140 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 222
|
As a 6'4 red blooded male with 8" wrists, this release is like heaven. Hate on it all you want, it will just make it easier for me to acquire this year :)
|
22 March 2017, 10:48 PM | #141 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 43
|
Quote:
Speaking of predictions, I believe a member predicted the demise of the 116600 back in January. He also predicted many things in his OP. I wonder if he got them right. I believe he was burned at the stake as well, LOL |
|
22 March 2017, 10:49 PM | #142 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
|
Discontinued 116600 was $10,400, new model is $11,350.
It will be interesting to see where the comparative prices settle on these. The 40mm 116600 was a very slow seller for the ADs I do business with. I think the new 43mm 116600 will significantly cannibalize sales from the 116660 Deepsea. If you actually dive with your Seadweller and the cyclops is an issue, it probably can be removed by your watchmaker. |
22 March 2017, 10:49 PM | #143 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DeepSea
Posts: 822
|
I love the size. Hate the cyclops
Not sure why the crystal can't be flush. Domed crystal looks so good on the DSSD flush with the bezel. Red font is like sticking an a badge on a car to make it look like a faster variant. |
22 March 2017, 10:49 PM | #144 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
|
The cyclop is a must since the increase in the case size. Otherwise the date will out of place i.e. too close to the centre of the dial
|
22 March 2017, 10:50 PM | #145 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: England
Watch: it guvnor!
Posts: 226
|
people hate change! .... this is absolutely beautiful. owner of a DSSD and a sub (no date) i'm itching to add this the SD4K had no appeal what-so ever for me! ..bland was an understatement' this is a winner
|
22 March 2017, 10:52 PM | #146 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
|
|
22 March 2017, 10:53 PM | #147 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2015
Location: MS
Posts: 373
|
I like it. But would rather have a regular Deepsea
|
22 March 2017, 10:54 PM | #148 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
RIP 116600 |
|
22 March 2017, 10:56 PM | #149 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
|
I am sure glad I got my SDc.
Guess some owners might remove that cyclops somehow. |
22 March 2017, 10:59 PM | #150 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 233
|
It it nice but would have been more desired at 42mm. I am also very curious of case thickness. That is just as important in my opinion. Omega 43mm PO 600, is a whopping 16.05mm thick. It looks like a hockey puck on a wrist.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.