The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 March 2017, 10:20 PM   #121
BadBoyR
"TRF" Member
 
BadBoyR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrummyJames View Post
And so it begins...
BadBoyR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:21 PM   #122
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
If anyone wants an SD4K, last time I visited my AD, they had 2 in the case.
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:22 PM   #123
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Looks good to me!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:22 PM   #124
RobearH
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Robear
Location: Come and Take It!
Watch: 126710 BLRO
Posts: 1,632
Wait is this just the DSSD case w/o the Ring Lock?
RobearH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:23 PM   #125
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Hate it....like really don't like it all. Some will which is good for them but not the watch for me.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:23 PM   #126
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
My next prediction is a lot of smaller wristed people asking if the new SD is too big on them. The answer will most likely be yes
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:24 PM   #127
BadBoyR
"TRF" Member
 
BadBoyR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by yannis7777 View Post
Looks good to me!
BadBoyR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:24 PM   #128
collarcity
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: New York
Watch: 16570, 14060M
Posts: 379
Too big. 43mm is a massive watch.
collarcity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:25 PM   #129
Gary.
"TRF" Member
 
Gary.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 397
Not keen on the size but I can understand it to some extent. Lots of people complained the the sd4000 should have gone up a size to fill the gap between the Sub and the dssd. The red is nice, too.

BUT A CYCLOPS?????!!!! SERIOUSLY? On a SEA Dweller?????

Oh, for crying out loud!!!!!!

Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory....
Gary. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:25 PM   #130
pop4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: MEL.
Posts: 20
Cyclops. On a freaking Sea-Dweller. Hell NO.
pop4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:26 PM   #131
adambb71
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 20
Why on earth have they put a cyclops on it??? The whole idea of the SD and DSSD not having cyclops was so that the watch could be used safely for saturation diving! The watches' intended purpose for crying out loud. That's why they have a helium escape valve!

I hate it, big time.
adambb71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:26 PM   #132
xlarge
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hungary
Watch: an extinct 116600
Posts: 119
I think the thickness is the same as the "old" 116600.
If so then it's a winner, hands-down, imho.
xlarge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:29 PM   #133
datejust24
"TRF" Member
 
datejust24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon View Post
Wasn't that the old Sea-Dweller ?
Minus the red text that's correct ...which is my point ...
datejust24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:30 PM   #134
derekstlmo
"TRF" Member
 
derekstlmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Derek
Location: st louis
Watch: Sd4000
Posts: 518
Im sure glad I have my sd4000 the ultimate tool watch
derekstlmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:33 PM   #135
Seaotter
"TRF" Member
 
Seaotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 546
Beautiful watchcase, love the red line.
Pity those 3 mm = Too big !!! & Pity Black, gloss finish Dial.

Love my 116600 even more !!! 40 mm & Satin Black Dial.
Seaotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:37 PM   #136
Gharddog03
"TRF" Member
 
Gharddog03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
Nice watch but would love to know the thickness. I could of done without the cyclops. Liking the red font.
Gharddog03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:39 PM   #137
DocHorton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: God Bless Texas
Watch: Smurf, DD40, SkyD.
Posts: 1,517
Awesome!! They finally make a sport watch for those who appreciate a larger size, but without the terrible looking ring inside like the DSSD. The red font is killer as well.
DocHorton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:42 PM   #138
G'ed
"TRF" Member
 
G'ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: RolexHQ boardroom
Posts: 1,232
Sea Dweller 4000
2014-2017

"The unpopular kid on the block"

RIP

Note: If Rolex did indeed discon 40mm, it's probably the shortest production modern Rolex in history. Market since Q3 2014 and ended Q1 2017, about 30 months. Even the Explorer 1 214270 "short hand" released in 2010 only updated in 2016, bearing same model number but with longer hands and lumed 3,6,9.
G'ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:42 PM   #139
TCMS
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
I like it and the size is right.
TCMS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:46 PM   #140
Uncle00Jesse
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 222
As a 6'4 red blooded male with 8" wrists, this release is like heaven. Hate on it all you want, it will just make it easier for me to acquire this year :)
Uncle00Jesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:48 PM   #141
khrystyan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
Is it really a gloss dial? I think one member here made this prediction last year and was burnt at the stake for it.
"Burned at the stake" LOL


Speaking of predictions, I believe a member predicted the demise of the 116600 back in January. He also predicted many things in his OP. I wonder if he got them right.

I believe he was burned at the stake as well, LOL
khrystyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:49 PM   #142
theken
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
Discontinued 116600 was $10,400, new model is $11,350.
It will be interesting to see where the comparative prices settle on these.
The 40mm 116600 was a very slow seller for the ADs I do business with.
I think the new 43mm 116600 will significantly cannibalize sales from the 116660 Deepsea.
If you actually dive with your Seadweller and the cyclops is an issue, it probably can be removed by your watchmaker.
theken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:49 PM   #143
SeamasterGMT
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DeepSea
Posts: 822
I love the size. Hate the cyclops
Not sure why the crystal can't be flush. Domed crystal looks so good on the DSSD flush with the bezel.
Red font is like sticking an a badge on a car to make it look like a faster variant.
SeamasterGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:49 PM   #144
jenniferjanef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,828
The cyclop is a must since the increase in the case size. Otherwise the date will out of place i.e. too close to the centre of the dial
jenniferjanef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:50 PM   #145
smellychips
"TRF" Member
 
smellychips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: England
Watch: it guvnor!
Posts: 226
people hate change! .... this is absolutely beautiful. owner of a DSSD and a sub (no date) i'm itching to add this the SD4K had no appeal what-so ever for me! ..bland was an understatement' this is a winner
smellychips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:52 PM   #146
BadBoyR
"TRF" Member
 
BadBoyR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: UK
Watch: SubsGMTsSDsYM2DJ41
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellychips View Post
people hate change! .... this is absolutely beautiful. owner of a DSSD and a sub (no date) i'm itching to add this the SD4K had no appeal what-so ever for me! ..bland was an understatement' this is a winner
BadBoyR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:53 PM   #147
Stuntpilot
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: MS
Posts: 373
I like it. But would rather have a regular Deepsea
Stuntpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:54 PM   #148
Seaotter
"TRF" Member
 
Seaotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by G'ed View Post
Sea Dweller 4000
2014-2017

"The unpopular kid on the block"

RIP

Note: If Rolex did indeed discon 40mm, it's probably the shortest production modern Rolex in history. Market since Q3 2014 and ended Q1 2017, about 30 months. Even the Explorer 1 214270 "short hand" released in 2010 only updated in 2016, bearing same model number but with longer hands and lumed 3,6,9.
Do not forget the TOG

RIP 116600
Seaotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:56 PM   #149
Trailblazer
"TRF" Member
 
Trailblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Cab
Location: A small world
Watch: es
Posts: 776
I am sure glad I got my SDc.

Guess some owners might remove that cyclops somehow.
Trailblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2017, 10:59 PM   #150
lindstd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 233
It it nice but would have been more desired at 42mm. I am also very curious of case thickness. That is just as important in my opinion. Omega 43mm PO 600, is a whopping 16.05mm thick. It looks like a hockey puck on a wrist.
lindstd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.