ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 February 2018, 10:05 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Is Stainless Steel the new PM ??? >>>>>
With the current Rolex market and all the controlled
SS professional model shortages will there be an end to this madness? One would have to admit 904L shines quite brilliantly in the spotlight and thus the popularity of stainless steel professional Rolex models ... A possible eminent price hike here in the US coupled with the crazy demand on the most popular models intentionally constrained in supply , the price gap on these models and certain PM models is closing in .... Taking in consideration the supply/demand and premium Prices on the secondary market for highly coveted SS models one would have to really determine which will be a better bargain long term ...? Just putting it out there, the SS madness doesn’t seem to settle down ... $9K plus SS Sub Date $10K BLNR’s $11/12K Hulks $13K plus SD43 Anniversary $18K Daytona C’s Wow!!!!! Madness I tell you .... Yet Stainless Steel seems to rule and be highly coveted more so than PM or TT.... or so it may seem... So I know SS flies under the radar so many say but it’s still a Rolex and 904L is quite brilliant!!! What say you , considering the current market madness and Rolex stainless steel shines quite nicely SS or PM ? Which is better long term ? |
26 February 2018, 10:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 6,545
|
What’s funny is that some TT models which obviously cost more to make and are at higher MSRP sell from ADs after discount for less than SS models from grey market!
It’s supply and demand that’s driving this craze!! Which tells me the pendulum has to set. Demand will change. It’s a fact that taste changes, interest changes and demand changes with it. That’s when the craze will settle down!
__________________
Wear the watch you like, not the one they tell you to wear! |
14 April 2018, 02:22 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
Watch: Sunray/Meteorite
Posts: 311
|
Quote:
__________________
.__. I don’t mind the value of a Rolex, i just admire the technology and the beauty of it .__. 16600/2005, 116233/2008, 214270/2014, 116234/2016, 116618LB/2017, 116200/2017, 118239/2017, 116622/2018, 326.30.40.50.02.001/2018. |
|
26 February 2018, 10:16 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,116
|
I'm no Oracle, but I think the current pricing is a bubble of sorts that will burst sooner as opposed to later. Will Rolex watches be more expensive today than they were a few years ago ?? yes....but I don't think it will be a long term or permanent situation. Like a lot of others have speculated: see what Basel brings in terms of new models, pricing, etc.
Though like all things Rolex availability and pricing related...its all just a guess as only Rolex knows and they're NOT talking. |
26 February 2018, 10:17 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
No, but nice try.
|
26 February 2018, 10:31 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
|
26 February 2018, 10:32 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
I’m in the opposite camp. No need for SS!!
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 |
26 February 2018, 11:11 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 454
|
|
26 February 2018, 03:15 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Martin
Location: NY And FLA
Watch: AP ROO Blue Scuba
Posts: 2,695
|
|
26 February 2018, 11:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
I started a thread about this topic also... it has an interesting article about value for money.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=585687 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
26 February 2018, 11:57 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,672
|
SS is more useable/wearable in most situations. The popularity of such will continue.
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
26 February 2018, 12:03 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: garden state
Posts: 522
|
|
26 February 2018, 12:11 PM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
on point... |
|
26 February 2018, 11:55 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,015
|
The SS watches could overtake TT watches. But never the PM models.
As for metallurgy- um...no, SS is not the new PM. But if rumors get started about new .500 Platinums coming out at Basel 2018, don’t say you heard it from me... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
26 February 2018, 11:57 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
I think SS will always rule with collectors. We see Rolex as tool watches and SS fits with this aesthetic and therefore becomes more collectible, desirable and even authentic in the wis mindset. The market shows this time after time with SS being a better investment than precious metal.
I agree that Rolex SS is so beautiful that it competes favourably with precious metal.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
26 February 2018, 01:02 PM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
|
|
26 February 2018, 12:00 PM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
I see a different explanation. Historically, many people have wanted the most affordable Rolex they could buy, and those were SS models. Now that white metals are en vogue, as are sports models (as opposed to dress models), SS sports watches are in high demand.
|
26 February 2018, 12:34 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
|
What makes you think yellow gold is dead? This forum is a minute population of the watch world, and I guarantee you Rolex still sells millions of yellow gold watches. I happen to own a few myself.
|
26 February 2018, 12:08 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
If one could choose I would ONLY buy PM. If money was no factor.
Nothing beats the feeling of strapping a PM piece to the wrist no matter what anyone says. As harsh as it sounds SS is the most popular because of 1 simple thing. Price point! Otherwise everyone would buy WG. |
26 February 2018, 12:30 PM | #20 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,672
|
Quote:
Plenty of words come to mind, but “harsh” isn’t one of them. Just wow !
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”. |
|
26 February 2018, 12:38 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
|
|
26 February 2018, 08:32 PM | #22 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Why? I buy SS because I prefer them not because of affordability. I have also owned pretty much every PM model one can think of over the years and I always come back to the core of Rolex..SS! So to each his own but don't generalize and drill down ones choices to one simple thing money.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
26 February 2018, 10:31 PM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
That said , I didn’t pose the question out of affordability for each . It just seemed to me that lately or maybe I finally noticed that SS sports models are a better bargain in the long term vs pm models... Most if not all professional series that are collectible are SS!!! Some AD’s are now pulling reserve SS pieces out of the safe and saying if you buy this PM piece I’ll let you buy this coveted SS model ... Which I think is dirty business but I don’t run the store ... so In no way am I bashing on PM models !!! I want to make that clear !!! In fact most of you know my passion for the Bluesy and my grail is The YG Bluesy one day !!! My next one is the BLRO !!! Basically put, to the average Joe it seems like SS is the better bargain long term and Rolex knows this that’s why SS sports models havd risen in demand and new heights reflecting in latest price points ... Rolex is playing and manipulating the market . Not so much in volume but long term they know that if they can increase demand they can jack up the price and not work so hard , Maintain brand image and status and achieve same results if not even better !!! |
|
26 February 2018, 08:34 PM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
Quote:
Plus plenty of people spend 50K plus on a SS watch... it isnt a Rolex though, but you could have 2 PM rolexes for that price. |
|
26 February 2018, 10:39 PM | #25 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,082
|
Quote:
|
|
26 February 2018, 10:55 PM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
Basically it has come down to the same old adage once again ... you gotta pay to play.., So then isn’t SS a better bargain long term if one buys right? Someone who purchased a 1680 or 5514 let’s say back in in the day could easily flip for a pm now depending on condition.and originality... if one could only foresee the future of collectibility. |
|
26 February 2018, 11:27 PM | #27 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,082
|
Quote:
I think many choose PM or SS because of the 'feelings' it evokes ... therefore, I don't think you can put a price on it. |
|
26 February 2018, 11:42 PM | #28 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
|
Quote:
When strapped onto the wrist!!! As the song goes , “ I second that emotion “ ... |
|
26 February 2018, 11:49 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
14 April 2018, 08:20 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,059
|
Quote:
Sure price is an issue. But it's an issue because you're not getting any benefit of functionality or ability to tell time for the extra $25K. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.