The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 September 2018, 07:09 PM   #121
kans86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,340
The SD4K for me is the best of both world. I also like the SD43, but find it a little big.
Attached Images
 
kans86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2018, 05:45 PM   #122
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Which Sea Dweller ...

They’re all special (as owners know)

I loved my 16600 but for me it’s this one




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2018, 07:49 AM   #123
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by kans86 View Post
The SD4K for me is the best of both world. I also like the SD43, but find it a little big.
Agree , since I’ve got mine it’s been my daily as well ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2018, 12:24 PM   #124
RXAPPP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Blue Planet
Watch: 5
Posts: 1,201
Between the SD4k and the giant Submariner I’d take the SD4k - the Sea dweller is now dead
RXAPPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 06:58 AM   #125
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXAPPP View Post
Between the SD4k and the giant Submariner I’d take the SD4k - the Sea dweller is now dead
Historically speaking I agree ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 07:10 AM   #126
Steve260
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: SeaDweller Family
Posts: 175
I have had a 16600 for many years (drilled lug version), got a SD4000 when it was released, and got a SD43 when it became available.

All 3 watches get regular wrist time, because I like them for different reasons.

If I could only keep one, it would probably be the 16600 because the proportions are perfect for my wrist and it is so comfortable to wear. My aging eyes do appreciate the cyclops on the SD43 though!
Steve260 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2018, 07:14 AM   #127
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
You got it !
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 05:51 AM   #128
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve260 View Post
I have had a 16600 for many years (drilled lug version), got a SD4000 when it was released, and got a SD43 when it became available.

All 3 watches get regular wrist time, because I like them for different reasons.

If I could only keep one, it would probably be the 16600 because the proportions are perfect for my wrist and it is so comfortable to wear. My aging eyes do appreciate the cyclops on the SD43 though!
Wow !!! I’d love to have all three ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2018, 12:14 PM   #129
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
I could not get used to the cyclop on SD43 so sold it.

Overall I still prefer 16600 but 116600 is a close second
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 10:47 AM   #130
TakeYourTime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Alex
Location: California
Watch: Changes daily
Posts: 410
IMHO... the SD43 is the best diver EVER made by any watch company
TakeYourTime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 12:16 PM   #131
beckington
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: WNY
Watch: SD4K - BLNR
Posts: 3
Buying an SD4K several years ago was the best watch buying decision I ever made.
beckington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 12:57 PM   #132
Chronographer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: Sea-Dweller 50th
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeYourTime View Post
IMHO... the SD43 is the best diver EVER made by any watch company
Same. I've been chasing the best diver for years and still have most of them. Thought the undisputed best was the the Omega PO 8900. I had a chance at a DSSD from my AD but passed on it - just didn't grab me. The SD43 though checks every box for me.
Chronographer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 October 2018, 01:14 PM   #133
david9962000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 133
Nice video:

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/re...ex-sea-dweller
david9962000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 10:22 AM   #134
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by david9962000 View Post
Thanks for posting ... Very informative.
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 05:23 PM   #135
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Historically speaking I agree ...
Why is that Mario?

The first subs were considerably smaller than the (almost) 41 mm they are now. Daytonas used to be 37 mm.

Is your opinion based on 3 mm and a glued on date magnifier?

Im genuinely curious about this.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 06:01 PM   #136
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXAPPP View Post
Between the SD4k and the giant Submariner I’d take the SD4k - the Sea dweller is now dead
Was it not dead already with the Deepsea?
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 07:49 PM   #137
Spoonage
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,133
If all things being equal (price / condition) I would love a double red, then any other vintage piece... After that I would say the D-Blue, then maybe the SD43... But I've never seen the SD43 in person, and would rather no cyclops if it was possible...
Spoonage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 09:55 PM   #138
Manu74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Mark
Location: Europe
Watch: BLRO | LV | SkyD
Posts: 1,404
I wouldn't trade my SD43 for any other.
Manu74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 10:09 PM   #139
gin47
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: usa
Posts: 159
D-blue 126660 for me all day long.
gin47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 10:24 PM   #140
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by RXAPPP View Post
Between the SD4k and the giant Submariner I’d take the SD4k - the Sea dweller is now dead
IMO its just been re-born

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 10:44 PM   #141
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devildog View Post
Why is that Mario?

The first subs were considerably smaller than the (almost) 41 mm they are now. Daytonas used to be 37 mm.

Is your opinion based on 3 mm and a glued on date magnifier?

Im genuinely curious about this.
Scott , I’m not against the SD43 given that I might
one day have one on my wrist ...
But Aesthetically speaking it has evolved so from
a historic point of view it’s not the same . That said
Rolex usually does changes/improvements
for the better . I’m hoping to eventually see and try
on a SD43 since I have decent size wrists it should
look great ...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 11:15 PM   #142
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
IMO its just been re-born

Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
With a number of genetic enhancements
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 October 2018, 11:27 PM   #143
Devildog
"TRF" Member
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by superstarmar View Post
Scott , I’m not against the SD43 given that I might
one day have one on my wrist ...
But Aesthetically speaking it has evolved so from
a historic point of view it’s not the same . That said
Rolex usually does changes/improvements
for the better . I’m hoping to eventually see and try
on a SD43 since I have decent size wrists it should
look great ...
Ahh! the old "asthetics" argument

Could that not apply to many references? I know you're not against it Mario, however its arguably closer aesthetically to the first Sea dweller than the Sub C is to the first Sub.

Is this all about the "c" word? It can't be size, surely, as the current Sub is circa 3mm larger than the original (in real terms, despite what the specs may say)
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR

Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green.
Devildog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 05:18 AM   #144
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
This one for now will do .
Attached Images
 
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 06:43 AM   #145
Bruins7
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: LA
Watch: Rolex(4),15400
Posts: 1,105
If you have the wrist size for the SD43 I would say the SD43 hands down. SD4k is also an awesome piece!
Bruins7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 06:55 AM   #146
TeddyS
"TRF" Member
 
TeddyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Teddy
Location: London U.K.
Watch: sea-dweller 126600
Posts: 670
SD43 then DSSD James Cameron for me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TeddyS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 08:43 AM   #147
Juclaq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SoCal
Watch: Sea Dweller 16600
Posts: 158
SD43 if you dont care. 4K if you are a true SD fan. Many consider the 4K the last true SD
Juclaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 09:38 AM   #148
jps3b
"TRF" Member
 
jps3b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Watch: 116619
Posts: 1,334
I had the SD43. As much as I loved it, I rarely wore it. I traded it in for a Smurf and am very happy I did since I wear my Smurf more than any other watch. Since I have such a good relationship with my AD, I bought the 116660 JC for a friend of mine who couldn’t get one at retail. I wore it out of the store and wore it the next day until I begrudgingly had to give it up. For the 24 hours I wore the watch, I was completely enamored with it. I’ve been spending all of my time looking to buy the 126660 since it was released at Basel. The watch is just mesmerizing. I’m patiently waiting for the call from my AD. Until then, I’m just peeping out all the lucky ducks here on TRF who have this amazing reference. I have the opportunity to buy the old reference, but the new one has much better dimensions and an upgraded movement. I’ll just wait.



Here is my friends JC. It was fun while it lasted

And here was my old SD43. I really loved the watch and if I was wealthy, I would have kept it. But I’m a working man and it had to be traded ☹️


jps3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 10:16 AM   #149
marcotagudelo
"TRF" Member
 
marcotagudelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by beckington View Post
Buying an SD4K several years ago was the best watch buying decision I ever made.
I purchased mine new in 2016 from a GD
For 7200 stickers box papers...nobody wanted it
Oh how the tides have turned
marcotagudelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2018, 10:18 AM   #150
fania123
"TRF" Member
 
fania123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PHILA
Posts: 1,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joearch View Post
I recently went 16600 since I prefer 40 mm and the 5 digit with alum insert with out dots at every minute position. I have a few other ceramic bezels. Depends on yoir collection. This is my current fav.

Nicest one of all!
fania123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.