ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
25 July 2009, 02:01 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
Exactly, it would be hard to put a 20k watch in the same drawer with the bell bottoms, thin ties and parachute pants. If the DJ is anything like the DDII it will make me throw up in my mouth. I actually laughed out loud when I tried on the DDII. It looked like a clown costume accessory. |
|
22 July 2009, 09:24 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Rolex&911Nation
Watch: GV
Posts: 547
|
is the DJ2 out yet? what about the Sub-C TT?
|
22 July 2009, 11:53 AM | #3 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: 1655 EXP
Posts: 36,337
|
|
22 July 2009, 11:50 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 69
|
I really like it, but would not wear it with a suit due to that bezel. It reminds me more of a sport watch to be honest. They should have saved the large bezels for sport watches imho. But the real test will be how it looks on my wrist; 36mm has always been too small for my wrist, but I do see the need to continue producing them for many men on this earth. Not all of us are 250lb Americans.
|
22 July 2009, 12:25 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Submariner 14060M
Posts: 162
|
It's a lovely watch, but not really my cup of tea. I prefer a sports watch to be 39-40mm or 42mm at the maximum, if the case is thin (like a speedmaster professional). For dressier watches I prefer smaller sizes. Perhaps I'm old fashioned, but I prefer the proportions of the older 36mm DJ.
__________________
♛ Rolex Submariner (14060M) | Explorer 2 White Dial (16570) | Day Date (1803) ♛ Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (15400) | Edward Piguet (15015ST) Vacheron Constantin Overseas Chronometer (42042) | Overseas Chronograph (49140) JLC Master Control Hometime (Q1628420) |
22 July 2009, 12:57 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: WI
Watch: 16233, 15200
Posts: 66
|
I like the looks of the DJII, but would never consider it a dress watch. I personally think the normal DJ is just barely a dress watch. I really don't know what I'd consider the DJII, as I don't think I'd call it a sports watch either.
And on another note, since he's been brought up a few times in the topic, let's laugh at this guy and his tiny, feminine watch. |
22 July 2009, 03:20 PM | #7 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
|
|
22 July 2009, 05:51 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 131
|
36 mm is OK for me, growth accelaration (all chemicals, hormons in the food) has not gone so fast everywhere.
By the way, the more I try and look new rolexes the more I like my Exp, new DJ looks a bit blocky and too shiny, the bezel is more prominent and I seem to like more subtle ones. I am planning to get one but have doubts. Maybe I am a one-watch guy. |
23 July 2009, 03:23 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
I have only seen and tried on the DayDate II, but I like the size and fit of it.
Personally, if I ever get a Datejust II, it won't be until they offer it on jubilee. I think the options are too limited at the moment relative to the wealth of options available with the regular Datejust. |
30 July 2009, 12:31 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: NH
Watch: Pam 312 & DJ II
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------ PAM 312, DJ II |
|
16 September 2009, 04:03 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 26
|
James,
That is the best looking DJ2 I have seen. It just needs the Jubilee. |
16 September 2009, 11:02 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 460
|
Have the DJ & DJ II.
I love them both but unless you are large guy with large wrists the DJ II is not a true dress watch... If you wear European shirts the cuffs can be a bit too tight for the DJ II (again this is for smaller wrists) I would say the DJ II best fills the role of a daily wear watch for someone who is not a suit or button down and tie guy. That is just my two cents based on experience being smaller (6.8 in wrist and wearing quite a bit of European designers when it comes to my suit) |
17 September 2009, 12:16 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 69
|
Looks like half the forum wants it (the other half hates it) but nobody buys it. It's been up for sale here in the forum (blue with roman) for 4 days now.
|
17 September 2009, 12:56 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
I do not like the new DJ2.
A dresswatch that is bigger then an EX2 or SUB etc.wich are furthermore toolwatches??? Horrible development imho! Maybe i am oldschool....
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
18 September 2009, 05:50 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1
|
Hi all,
My first post on this forum so please excuse any ignorance. Am just about to buy my first ever Rolex and am torn between a Sub and a DateJust - however the latter does look a little small on my wrist and I was excited to learn about the new 2009 DJII. Does anybody know if this has been released in the UK yet (in particular the steel and white gold style shown in the first picture in this thread)? Thanks |
5 October 2009, 10:21 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: John
Location: arkansas
Watch: 114060, IWC
Posts: 562
|
I only wish they had gone with the brushed bracelet. Not a big fan of the brushed/polished as a casual bracelet
|
5 October 2009, 10:28 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Get it - wear it - enjoy it
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
5 October 2009, 10:28 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
Too big for a dress watch. This is a fine sport model, but SS and 40mm+ is not a dress watch.
Nice watch, though. |
5 October 2009, 11:00 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: 116234
Posts: 4,150
|
I LOVE it and will be buying one as soon as possible!!
|
5 October 2009, 11:53 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Land of the Lost
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,201
|
I don't like the DJ II. I saw nothing wrong with the size of the DJ! Perhaps it'll grow on me; I don't know. The proportions seem all "fun house mirror."
|
5 October 2009, 12:32 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 459
|
I disagree I think the Date Just II was needed, I am 6'0" tall and would never were the tiny 36mm DJ it's just too small. looks like a kids watch or woman watch. It's been a long time coming and I think Rolex finally realized that they need to make a bigger dress watch. look at Panerai Nice biggger and dressy. big watches are in style now and Rolex knows it
|
22 July 2009, 09:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Texas
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 2,352
|
Hey James,
I gotta contact you... send me a PM... I want to know if you can contact me with your AD and get 15% off as well. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.