ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 September 2012, 10:18 PM | #151 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
i don't think it's genuine
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2 |
27 September 2012, 11:01 PM | #152 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,510
|
You said he would pay for the full service from RSC, I would just have him do that and the watch will be 100 percent factory fresh and original. You will lose the diamond dial because it is an aftermarket, but hey at least you will have a 100 percent factory fresh rolex with a 2 year warranty. Plus it will look brand new which is way better than the first day you bought it =). Hope it all works out
|
27 September 2012, 11:30 PM | #153 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Quote:
Not trying to beat you up. We all HATE/LOATH to see someone with good intentions get taken advantage of. This transaction could have EASILY been any one of us, so the reactions here on this forum are going to sway towards the hostile side (towards the seller) and I think we 'adopt' the fight/stick up for one other. Someone who sells high end watches as part of their living has no excuse (and no business) selling them if they are ignorant to the details of what they are selling, especially to "friends"....bad move. A car dealer can't advertise and sell a Mustang Cobra GT just because it has the words "Cobra" and "GT" on it....it has to be vetted/verified. Let's assume the best case scenario at this point....RSC judges the dial to be correct.....the watch is still a FAR cry from the word "new". Regardless of how it looks/feels - 99% of the community is behind you. My .02. |
|
28 September 2012, 12:04 AM | #154 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
Well said, sorry that you interpret some of what has been said as anger towards YOU, it's really (from the way I say it) as a protection kind of anger, we don't want you to screwed in this deal. Hopefully it will all work out very soon, but as was very well stated above, that "New" is just not right IMHO. Again, hope it all works itself out for you very soon. |
|
28 September 2012, 01:23 AM | #155 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Vacheron Overseas
Posts: 297
|
Let's get this story straight, did you believe you were getting a new, totally genuine Rolex Datejust with no aftermarket parts? Your post seems contradictory about this point, in particular, whether you were informed from the onset that the diamonds were not set by Rolex.
__________________
Patek Philippe Calatrava 5119J; Vacheron Constantin Overseas; Jaeger-LeCoultre Grande Reverso Duo; Rolex Submariner 114060; Baume and Mercier Hampton Annual Calendar; Tudor Heritage Black Bay. |
28 September 2012, 02:15 AM | #156 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
|
RSC, Please resolve this for us.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist. |
28 September 2012, 02:27 AM | #157 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Quote:
First of all, I have never seen a Rolex with this; the diamonds tend to sit well within the ring of tick marks. Second of all, I don't recall ever seeing a tritium dial with diamonds, so why would a tritium dial have spacing for diamonds? Third of all, this would indicate that the dial originally had diamonds (no other reason for the spacing) and I'd be curious to know what happened to them, since they really aren't big enough to pull off and sell (plus, see #2 above). Finally, and this could just be the angle of the shot/my eyes, but the Rolex logo crown at 12:00 looks off. Can't quite decide how, but something about it just looks a bit, well, off... To me this indicates that the dial is completely fake. |
|
3 October 2012, 11:34 AM | #158 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Watch: 16078 / 16618
Posts: 434
|
WOW that a mess. OP I hope you get it settled out!
|
30 October 2012, 04:47 AM | #159 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 74' 1680
Posts: 122
|
It's been a month since OP last posted about the case. I really wonder what the outcome is
|
30 October 2012, 04:57 AM | #160 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 38
|
Wow... I can't believe it's been a month already. This process has taken much longer than expected. In fact, I just received the watch back from Rolex this morning. As predicted by so many of you, Rolex confirmed the dial and hands are not authentic and gave me an estimate of how much it would cost to get the watch up to Rolex standards. Unfortunately, Rolex does not offer the MOP diamond dial, so we are returning the watch to the jeweler, who admitted that he misinformed us about the dial. Hopefully, we will receive a full refund without too much more trouble and time. Then, the search is on for my dream watch.
By the way, Rolex says there is no damage under the bezel, but just some residue that will come off with an ultrasonic cleaning (maybe hairspray or perfume). I guess the high-powered camera lens made it look worse than it is. Thanks again to all the TRF members who have given their opinions and advice. I'll still keep you posted when all is said and done! |
30 October 2012, 05:03 AM | #161 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: 74' 1680
Posts: 122
|
Thank you for the update! I am glad Rolex was able to definitively confirm everything for you (and without confiscating the watch like someone mentioned they would).
I hope you will get the full refund and begin your search for your genuine dream Rolex. Sometimes it's better to pay more for something you know it's truly genuine and legit. Also look for one with box and papers as that will help preserve the value of the watch better down the road. Good luck! |
30 October 2012, 05:04 AM | #162 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Glad it is working out for you. Next time: buy the seller first!
|
30 October 2012, 05:09 AM | #163 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
Glad it worked out well for you
|
30 October 2012, 05:33 AM | #164 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Thought this thread was dead......
|
30 October 2012, 06:06 AM | #165 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Kyle
Location: PA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 404
|
'Interesting' thread to say the least...a good read though. Very educational.
|
30 October 2012, 06:09 AM | #166 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Thank you for the update. Let us know when you get a full refund, and we can then help you in your quest for your dream watch!
|
30 October 2012, 06:16 AM | #167 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Washington, DC
Watch: Bluesy, Hulk, DSSD
Posts: 310
|
|
30 October 2012, 06:20 AM | #168 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
|
Good luck! You deserve a new watch after this fiasco. Looking forward to seeing a wristshot of your new watch!
|
30 October 2012, 07:11 AM | #169 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Texas
Watch: what I'm wearing
Posts: 5,943
|
It isn't over until you are refunded 100%. Good to hear an update, but let us know the refun goes.
__________________
TRFs "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Patron-Founding Member PClub # 10 74,592 The safest place for your watch is on your wrist. |
30 October 2012, 08:40 AM | #170 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Vancouver Canada
Watch: datejust
Posts: 104
|
I hope you get a full refund and ditch your so called friend
|
30 October 2012, 09:01 AM | #171 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Best of luck in your search of the dream watch!
|
30 October 2012, 09:18 AM | #172 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Raja
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 951
|
Good to see TRFers stepping up to offer their advice. One thing is certain- when most share the same opinion on this forum, it is often (of course not always) the truth.
Good luck in your search for your new watch. Buy from a trusted seller and get peace of mind, which is often times invaluable. |
30 October 2012, 09:24 AM | #173 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: New York
Watch: Patek 5980r
Posts: 489
|
Very educational read. It really is a testament to how helpful the members on this forum are. Thanks for the insight everyone.
__________________
Patek Philippe 5980R Audemars Piguet 41 ROC 26320OR Audemars Piguet Rubens Barrichello 2 Rose Gold Richard Mille RM011 Rose Gold / Titanium Rolex Yacht-Master II SS |
30 October 2012, 09:56 AM | #174 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 86
|
To the OP: I have a quick suggestion for you...
Go to a watch repair or watchmaker shop, ask them to take out the back casing for inspecting the Rolex's movement. Snap some pictures and post them in this thread; we will tell you whether the watch is authentic or not. Trust me! It's fast and simple without many hassles. With the dial issue, you can switch dials between datejust models if the watch models are identical to each other like 1601 for 1601, 1603 & 1603, etc...; if u concern, a new dial cost about $400-500 (plain without diamonds), $2000 for diamonds from Rolex (Their price hike up 3x than the real cost of the diamonds). Or you can go to a local jeweler and check the grade/quality on the dial; real or fake, u will know.. Just pop the case out back and show us your movement; i will tell you whether if it's real or not. I think your watch is little older than 1999; in mid 70s to late 80s. |
31 October 2012, 09:32 AM | #175 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
^^^^OP just said getting a refund a few posts up from yours....
|
31 October 2012, 10:11 AM | #176 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Watch: 16078 / 16618
Posts: 434
|
Quote:
Quote:
He sent the watch to Rolex, Im pretty sure they would know if its real or not. |
||
31 October 2012, 10:56 AM | #177 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
|
31 October 2012, 12:19 PM | #178 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 86
|
im little too late oh well
|
1 November 2012, 05:27 PM | #179 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Linz
Location: Perth WA
Watch: My bank balance!
Posts: 1,373
|
Quote:
GREAT news I just love a happy ending, it's just a shame the jeweller admitted he had misinformed you regarding the dial AFTER the RSC confirmed it Best of luck finding your dream watch.....oh yeah just a quick one before I go....check out the for sale section here on TRF, there is some awesome sellers on here who can help you find the right watch for a great price! Have fun
__________________
SS Submariner Date 16610 - SS Polar Explorer GMT 216570 |
|
13 November 2012, 03:08 AM | #180 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 38
|
Final update... the jeweler offered to refund all but $500. I'm not sure why the $500 difference, but my husband was happy with the offer and decided it wasn't worth fighting over that amount of money, especially since they are friends.
Thanks once more to all who posted their opinions and advice. If not for the expert advice you all gave, I would probably still be wearing a Franken-watch without even knowing it. I have already started stalking the TRF sale board and can't wait to have a 100% genuine Rolex on my wrist! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.