The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 July 2024, 10:59 PM   #151
6172crew
"TRF" Member
 
6172crew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Boerne TX
Posts: 36
I took my brother in-law shopping for his first real watch. I wanted to make sure he got to see the most and try them all on while in Las Vegas and southern Texas.

He ended up getting a snowy valley GS. He liked the effort made to make it look different, the lume dial and the way the watch wore. GS and even the turtle Seiko have that weird bevel on the backside that allow them to sit lower than a thicker watch should. He was offer a date just that day but he didn’t feel like it was that special. The Omega GMT was another one he spent a little time looking at and I wasn’t sure if he would go that way or not but I think it was probably too traditional like the date just.

He even wore a BLRO for 10 minutes and just didn’t seem stare at it like I do when I try one on.

The Tudor is another one to look at but I don’t like the coin bezel and they are thicker than I’d like so I’m sticking with the “wait list”.
6172crew is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 10:59 PM   #152
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
That wasn't really the point though, the statement was that Rolex is only dominant because of their marketing. Which is completely false. Nod to their marketing though, as I've said in previous posts on the thread, it's incredibly unique and exceptional in many ways.
Neil. It's estimated that Rolex's marketing budget is between 50-100 million US dollars per year. Half a billion to a billion dollars per decade.

Think about that.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:00 PM   #153
Neil McCauley
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
You remind me of certain car enthusiasts who only like, say, BMW cars and will not tolerate any criticism of BMW whatsoever.

I'm obviously a Rolex fan, otherwise I wouldn't own any. I'm able to step outside the Rolex bubble, and look at other brands as well. Every brand has its strengths and weaknesses. Try it, if you like. If you don't, then don't. Why should I care?
I think it's fair that when you make a comment like you did, to be questioned to come up with some objective reasons as to why your statement is correct.
You didn't manage to do that, all your responses were subjective and open to debate
Neil McCauley is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:00 PM   #154
EEpro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
"Why does GS lose $5K per watch (per your example) and how is that better?"

Resale value and market demand are frankly irrelevant to me, because I don't view watches as investments. The only reason why Rolex is dominant is marketing.

"Why is an exhibition caseback better?"

Because it allows you to look at the exquisite finishing of the movement. If you're not interested in the movement, it's not compulsory to look. Why do some high-end Ferraris etc. have glass covers on their engines?

"Why isn’t continuity of design better?" GS are reissuing some of their classic designs from the 1960s, and have strong design roots in their "Heritage" range.

"Why is a quartz assisted mechanical movement better?" Because of the smooth sweep of the second hand, and timekeeping accuracy. If you don't want a Spring Drive, you can choose from either 4Hz or 5Hz mechanical movements, either autos or manual wind with very long power reserves.

"the marketplace doesn’t agree" The marketplace thinks Rolex is better than JLC. McDonalds dominates the restaurant industry...

Oh man, if losing value on secondary is the metric my Vacherons are the worst watches ever made. I could buy any colorway Daytona from DavidSW with the loss on a single rose gold VC.
__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:01 PM   #155
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
Neil. It's estimated that Rolex's marketing budget is between 50-100 million US dollars per year. Half a billion to a billion dollars per decade.

Think about that.
Wow, if these figures are correct its no wonder everyone wants a Rolex.

__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:02 PM   #156
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
I think it's fair that when you make a comment like you did, to be questioned to come up with some objective reasons as to why your statement is correct.
You didn't manage to do that, all your responses were subjective and open to debate
Post#126
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:03 PM   #157
Neil McCauley
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
Neil. It's estimated that Rolex's marketing budget is between 50-100 million US dollars per year. Half a billion to a billion dollars per decade.

Think about that.
I still don't see your point.

You can spend billions of $$ on marketing but if your product is garbage you're still going to fail.
Neil McCauley is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:06 PM   #158
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxfordian View Post
Wow, if these figures are correct its no wonder everyone wants a Rolex.

This 7 minute film explains an awful lot about Rolex, and why people think wearing a big steel sports watch with a suit is OK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwMY...asebackWatches
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:07 PM   #159
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
I still don't see your point.

You can spend billions of $$ on marketing but if your product is garbage you're still going to fail.
Where did I say that Rolex is garbage? Grand Seiko are better, that's all.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:09 PM   #160
Neil McCauley
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
Where did I say that Rolex is garbage? Grand Seiko are better, that's all.
Oh wow lol

I was responding to the person who commented that Rolex is only dominant due to its marketing, but you highjacked it.

Go polish your zaratsu or something

Correction - Oh that person, was you hahaha! - You said that Rolex is only dominant due to its marketing, which is a totally dumb statement and not true. it's about balance, you have to have a great product to back it up. If grand seiko had the marketing budget that Rolex does, I still don't think they would have the appeal that Rolex does today. People just don't resonate with it. It's a niche brand, and always will be.
Neil McCauley is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:10 PM   #161
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
I still don't see your point.

You can spend billions of $$ on marketing but if your product is garbage you're still going to fail.
If your product is garbage you're unlikely to have billions of $$ to spend on marketing, millions or hundreds of thousands yes but billions no. I get your drift though, the product has to stand up to scrutiny at some point.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:17 PM   #162
suzika64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Austria
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
Oh wow lol

I was responding to the person who commented that Rolex is only dominant due to its marketing, but you highjacked it.

Go polish your zaratsu or something

Correction - Oh that person, was you hahaha! - You said that Rolex is only dominant due to its marketing, which is a totally dumb statement and not true. it's about balance, you have to have a great product to back it up. If grand seiko had the marketing budget that Rolex does, I still don't think they would have the appeal that Rolex does today. People just don't resonate with it. It's a niche brand, and always will be.
With a good marketing campaign you can make even a very worthless product shine. But only for a short time, then it bursts like a balloon.... Look at the MVMT example. It's not like it will last for 100 years like Rolex does.
suzika64 is offline  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:18 PM   #163
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
You remind me of certain car enthusiasts who only like, say, BMW cars and will not tolerate any criticism of BMW whatsoever.

I'm obviously a Rolex fan, otherwise I wouldn't own any. I'm able to step outside the Rolex bubble, and look at other brands as well. Every brand has its strengths and weaknesses. Try it, if you like. If you don't, then don't. Why should I care?
I currently own seventeen watches, down from thirty, only four of them Rolex. You remind me of someone who tries to establish their superiority through diminishment of others. My point is that you are wrong, that Grand Seiko is not objectively better than Rolex, it is merely different. My point is not and has never been that Rolex is above criticism. And you care enough about my opinion to argue with it.

I have nothing against Grand Seiko, I respect the brand just as I respect the Seikos already in my watch box, they just don’t make anything I want to wear and they are not objectively “better.”
Kevin of Larchmont is online now  
Old 23 July 2024, 11:53 PM   #164
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
I currently own seventeen watches, down from thirty, only four of them Rolex. You remind me of someone who tries to establish their superiority through diminishment of others. My point is that you are wrong, that Grand Seiko is not objectively better than Rolex, it is merely different. My point is not and has never been that Rolex is above criticism. And you care enough about my opinion to argue with it.

I have nothing against Grand Seiko, I respect the brand just as I respect the Seikos already in my watch box, they just don’t make anything I want to wear and they are not objectively “better.”
Ugh.

Whatever, dude.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:02 AM   #165
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
You said that Rolex is only dominant due to its marketing, which is a totally dumb statement and not true.
How do you know it's not true? We can't reshape the watch world with Rolex marketing removed from it.

Hans W established the brand based on marketing. They made many dubious and sometimes outright untrue claims, such as the world's first self-winding watch as an example. That had to be retracted.

They also claimed Rolex was the first watch at the top of Everest, also untrue apparently, that was Smiths. The Explorer didn't exist in 1953, but today it's the Everest watch. The Submariner wasn't the first dive watch, and was rejected by the US Navy on quality grounds. Throughout the 50s and 60s, the high quality brand was Omega, and Rolex was the cheapie. That's been turned on its head by marketing.

Anyway, clearly I have upset some very thin-skinned Rolex fans by daring to suggest that the Japanese can do things better, so I'll leave it there.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:08 AM   #166
Torshalla
"TRF" Member
 
Torshalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: Sweden
Posts: 376
The great part about the “lists” is that getting the opportunity to buy a Rolex from an AD at list price is in itself an achievement… so no need for any other achievement to justify pulling the trigger :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Torshalla is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:12 AM   #167
Littletommy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Littletommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Mayor Vaughn
Location: Shark City, FL
Posts: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by csaltphoto View Post
Yeah... I get that. That was my experience too. So I went gray and got treated like a customer.
^^This.
Littletommy is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:15 AM   #168
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post

Anyway, clearly I have upset some very thin-skinned Rolex fans by daring to suggest that the Japanese can do things better, so I'll leave it there.
No, you made blanket assertions that you argued but failed to support. The only one upset here is you.
Kevin of Larchmont is online now  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:18 AM   #169
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
I currently own seventeen watches, down from thirty, only four of them Rolex. You remind me of someone who tries to establish their superiority through diminishment of others. My point is that you are wrong, that Grand Seiko is not objectively better than Rolex, it is merely different. My point is not and has never been that Rolex is above criticism. And you care enough about my opinion to argue with it.

I have nothing against Grand Seiko, I respect the brand just as I respect the Seikos already in my watch box, they just don’t make anything I want to wear and they are not objectively “better.”
So true, all watches are basically the same, they tell the time.

How they do this and how they show this are what makes the brands different, and that's what I like this hobby.
__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:20 AM   #170
goldfixer21
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
goldfixer21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 807
Rolex is a marketing genius. There is no denying it. If you took any Rolex model, and put a different name on the dial, it would be just another nice watch. The market for stainless sport models in many cases ,is driven by profit, not the desire to wear that particular watch. How else would so many new unworn models be available on the gray market? I'm not complaining, it's a free market, individuals are not forced to pay 2X MSRP for some models.
goldfixer21 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:33 AM   #171
Ferrari-F430
"TRF" Member
 
Ferrari-F430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 153
Hopefully the slowing of the grey market diminishes the wait at an AD! If people can’t flip them and the AD’s can’t sell them out the back door (allegedly) then it will be more about obtaining a luxury watch because you want it and not because you know it’s worth thousands more than what you paid (like the good old days).
Ferrari-F430 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 12:34 AM   #172
Neil McCauley
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
How do you know it's not true?
Because you cannot run a company for 100years plus at the top of its game purely on marketing. If you think that is the case you're a fool. You have to have products to back up the claims, otherwise the marketing is meaningless and you get caught out eventually. This is not just relating to Rolex, this is every brand to have ever existed. This isn't me giving an opinion on Rolex, it's fact, it's how things work. Rolex is not just dominant as a result of its marketing, end of chat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
Anyway, clearly I have upset some very thin-skinned Rolex fans by daring to suggest that the Japanese can do things better, so I'll leave it there.
People who lose in debate over things often resort to low-hanging fruit and insults. If it makes you feel better that you think you have upset some of us, have at it, buddy. Enjoy it, you're right, you won the internet battle today.
Neil McCauley is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 01:50 AM   #173
IGY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
...If you think that is the case you're a fool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
...People who lose in debate over things often resort to low-hanging fruit and insults.
Perfect demonstration.
IGY is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 01:53 AM   #174
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
No, you made blanket assertions that you argued but failed to support. The only one upset here is you.
I supported them in post #126. Have a read.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...&postcount=126
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 01:55 AM   #175
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil McCauley View Post
Because you cannot run a company for 100years plus at the top of its game purely on marketing.
This is known as a "straw-man argument". Misrepresent what the other person has said, and then attack that.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 01:57 AM   #176
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by IGY View Post
Perfect demonstration.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 01:59 AM   #177
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
I supported them in post #126. Have a read.

https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...&postcount=126
Circling back to your opinion. I gotta give you credit, you are committed to the bit.
Kevin of Larchmont is online now  
Old 24 July 2024, 02:02 AM   #178
rolexpatek363
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: up a hill
Posts: 1,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
Circling back to your opinion. I gotta give you credit, you are committed to the bit.
Not my opinion.

For instance, some examples: it is a fact that Rolex are made by machine and GS are hand-finished.

GS also offer more movement options.

GS have higher-quality finishing.
rolexpatek363 is offline  
Old 24 July 2024, 02:06 AM   #179
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexpatek363 View Post
Not my opinion.

For instance, some examples: it is a fact that Rolex are made by machine and GS are hand-finished.

GS also offer more movement options.

GS have higher-quality finishing.
Now you’re just repeating yourself. It’s a little sad.
Kevin of Larchmont is online now  
Old 24 July 2024, 02:08 AM   #180
Marcjvr
"TRF" Member
 
Marcjvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin of Larchmont View Post
I have nothing against Grand Seiko, I respect the brand just as I respect the Seikos already in my watch box, they just don’t make anything I want to wear and they are not objectively “better.”
Dunno man

Watch this review of Rolex vs grand seiko vs A Lange and Sohn, all under magnification, and the Rolex comes last. Rolex also gets skewered in the comments because of the findings in the video


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hKrJOM...9hcmlvbg%3D%3D
__________________
Never place your happiness on something you have or can physically acquire
Marcjvr is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.