The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 July 2011, 12:34 AM   #181
Newportkrieger
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
Personally, I like the TT look and own a GMT 1675/3 TT, a 1601 TT and a 16713 TT.

It is my opinion that the TT do not hold value as well as the SS over time because of the dramatic increase in bracelet stretch vs. SS over the same period of time/use.

The replacement cost of a Rolex TT bracelet from an AD is prohibitive. You will notice that most TT watches have well stretched Jubilee bracelets, oysters much less so but still way more than the SS version. Therefore, the TT watches need to be priced lower in the used market to take into account the cost of bracelet replacement or stated another way, the watches need to be discounted more to offset the decreased utility value of their stretched bracelets and/or offset the future depreciation of the faster stretching TT bracelet.

I just bought my TT 1675/3 and love it. I also bought a high quality aftermarket jubilee bracelet to wear it on and am sending the original out for refurbishment. I will not wear the original bracelet ever but it will be nice and tight and stay with the watch from a collectors standpoint.
Newportkrieger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 12:55 AM   #182
never2late
"TRF" Member
 
never2late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMarcus View Post
TT is gaining popularity but the fact remains SS is usually the entry level Rolex for most people hence the popularity. Just ask any AD.

I totally disagree that TT is gaudy or ostentatious. SS can be just as ostentatious if its worn by someone with an "in your face" personality! The perfect combination IMO is to have both a SS and TT for those special occasions when a little gold shimmering under the sleave is perfect. But we all know it boils down to just getting whatever appeals to you. I just don't think it's fair or accurate to denigrate those who enjoy TT.

If anyone thinks TT is not gaining popularity in the US then they need to take a trip to Vegas!

Cheers!
I couldn't agree more.
Attached Images
 
never2late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 01:26 AM   #183
HORNBLOWER
"TRF" Member
 
HORNBLOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Ben
Location: Ireland
Watch: 1 OR 2
Posts: 2,640
I like both, it depends on my mood and what I'm wearing.
HORNBLOWER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 07:06 AM   #184
SALTY
"TRF" Member
 
SALTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,500
I must respectfully disagree with the comment that a TT is an advertisement to the fact that one cannot afford a full gold watch. I am in a suit and tie at work. Up until recently when i was fortunate to obtain a SS Daytona (white dial) my TT GMTIIC got just about all of the wrist time. The YG DD (bark/black dial) sat in the safe for special occasions. I'm wearing the daytona regularly but the TT GMTIIC is my favorate all-arounder. And, as someone previously posted, i can wear my TT with gold jewelry or silver.

I like SS but there is certanly nothing wrong with TT, notwithstanding the stretch of the bracelets and the high replacement cost.

Then again, I have a hairy chest and do get fairly tan in the summer.
SALTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 07:10 AM   #185
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
When did this topic pop up again. Mods is it possible to delete my post on the first page. You make one comment and it is set in stone for all of time.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 08:20 AM   #186
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nimrod View Post
I must respectfully disagree with the comment that a TT is an advertisement to the fact that one cannot afford a full gold watch. I am in a suit and tie at work. Up until recently when i was fortunate to obtain a SS Daytona (white dial) my TT GMTIIC got just about all of the wrist time. The YG DD (bark/black dial) sat in the safe for special occasions. I'm wearing the daytona regularly but the TT GMTIIC is my favorate all-arounder. And, as someone previously posted, i can wear my TT with gold jewelry or silver.

I like SS but there is certanly nothing wrong with TT, notwithstanding the stretch of the bracelets and the high replacement cost.

Then again, I have a hairy chest and do get fairly tan in the summer.
I cant agree with you more, the bracelets stretch can be avoided if you clean the band once a week and an ultrasonic cleaning one a month. I go to my dads dental lab and remove the band throw it in there for a couple of minutes comes out like new, I dont have any dirt inside the hollow jubillee links.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 July 2011, 09:18 AM   #187
zeppe19avr
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Sea-dweller Z ser.
Posts: 67
This discussion is going nowhere.... I don`t care about what is in trend or fashion or in or out of style ! I wear whatever I like and appeals to me, be it SS, TT or gold.
Remember the old saying: Whatever is old is new again ! I bet you gold will make a comeback after the trend of wearing SS wears down.. When ? Nobody knows.....
zeppe19avr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2011, 01:58 AM   #188
Rolex-Girl
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 89
TT is classic!
Rolex-Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2011, 02:06 AM   #189
mlotus95
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: pa
Watch: GMT master II
Posts: 600
i like them both.
mlotus95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2011, 02:20 AM   #190
never2late
"TRF" Member
 
never2late's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Jerry
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
When did this topic pop up again. Mods is it possible to delete my post on the first page. You make one comment and it is set in stone for all of time.
Just goes to show, you have to watch what you say because people will remember and judge you accordingly. Its one thing to express an opinion about your personal feelings and quite another to express an opinion that insults the personal feelings others might hold. Personally, I'm not a fan of an all gold watch . . . but I love the contrast between the stainless and gold on a TT watch. It has nothing to do with what I can or can't afford.
never2late is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 03:58 AM   #191
Lgear080
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
I practically stole my 116523 daytona and just got an amazing arabic panda face
to match.

best deal on the planet.
Lgear080 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:01 AM   #192
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
I always liked the TT on the sub/GMT. IMO
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:08 AM   #193
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold
Disagree completely. IMO I always found the SS/TT/all gold to be so different from each other. The contrast of the TT v all gold is so different...making them "different". IMO anyways
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:14 AM   #194
EchoBlueUK
"TRF" Member
 
EchoBlueUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
TT rules...but its a fashion thing.
EchoBlueUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:27 AM   #195
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Originally Posted by The Joker
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold

All due respect, who cares man ... As my favorite AD lady told me once ... "if you like it, buy it ... if you don't, don't".

Personally, I don't think you can beat a Black TT Sub C.
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:28 AM   #196
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
First, as a child of the 80's, I have avoided yellow gold of any sort for over a decade. It makes me feel like I'm either out of place or playing a supporting role in an Adam Sandler throwback movie.

Moreover, a TT datejust is, from my experience, what every non-WIS person (or more likely, their wife) ends up with when they finally have enough money to waddle into an AD and say "Hey, it's about time I bought myself/my husband a Rolex."

Without fail, if I talk to someone I meet professionally who has a DJ, most especially a TT DJ, they have no clue about anything at all related to their watch, other than it was the expensive Rolex they finally treated themselves to.

On the other hand, if I see a guy with a Coke GMT or an Expy II, you can usually expect some interesting conversation. These guys tend to have learned more and shopped more for their watch, and tend to be quite frankly more discerning owners. They got the watch that wasn't the obvious choice pushed on them by an AD or bought for them by their wives.

My 2c.

And all that being said, no one in their right mind can argue that a Bluesy Sub (the original, not the smurfmariners) isn't gorgeous.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:46 AM   #197
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscepter View Post
as for YG - i love the feel and heft. but i think you need to be 70 years old and very tan to pull off a YG rolex.
70? Come on. I believe is not you age, but how you wear that watch..
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Cv-0TBEhWV...600-h/Mark.jpgttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Cv-0TBEhWVE/SRG8LSFb2HI/AAAAAAAAFe4/lZciBmvR59E/s1600-h/Mark.jpg


Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 04:48 AM   #198
__ma
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 62
They look good on Florida golf courses ;)
__ma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 05:04 AM   #199
Rolex Junky
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 116710LN & 116201
Posts: 849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
First, as a child of the 80's, I have avoided yellow gold of any sort for over a decade. It makes me feel like I'm either out of place or playing a supporting role in an Adam Sandler throwback movie.

Moreover, a TT datejust is, from my experience, what every non-WIS person (or more likely, their wife) ends up with when they finally have enough money to waddle into an AD and say "Hey, it's about time I bought myself/my husband a Rolex."

Without fail, if I talk to someone I meet professionally who has a DJ, most especially a TT DJ, they have no clue about anything at all related to their watch, other than it was the expensive Rolex they finally treated themselves to.

On the other hand, if I see a guy with a Coke GMT or an Expy II, you can usually expect some interesting conversation. These guys tend to have learned more and shopped more for their watch, and tend to be quite frankly more discerning owners. They got the watch that wasn't the obvious choice pushed on them by an AD or bought for them by their wives.

My 2c.

And all that being said, no one in their right mind can argue that a Bluesy Sub (the original, not the smurfmariners) isn't gorgeous.
Or it might just be that tastes and preferences differ. Personally I find your coments to be insulting. Please try to be more considerate of others next time and avoid degrading into stereotypes.
Rolex Junky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 05:50 AM   #200
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Moreover, a TT datejust is, from my experience, what every non-WIS person (or more likely, their wife) ends up with when they finally have enough money to waddle into an AD and say "Hey, it's about time I bought myself/my husband a Rolex."

Without fail, if I talk to someone I meet professionally who has a DJ, most especially a TT DJ, they have no clue about anything at all related to their watch, other than it was the expensive Rolex they finally treated themselves to.
That's a bit of a generalization don't you think? I've seen some beautiful TTs posted on countless threads here and I bet their owners know a thing or two about them.

On the other hand, I don't see anything wrong with somebody wanting to treat themselves to something they like even if they don't know the last detail about it, free world and all.
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 07:46 AM   #201
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
First, as a child of the 80's, I have avoided yellow gold of any sort for over a decade. It makes me feel like I'm either out of place or playing a supporting role in an Adam Sandler throwback movie.

Moreover, a TT datejust is, from my experience, what every non-WIS person (or more likely, their wife) ends up with when they finally have enough money to waddle into an AD and say "Hey, it's about time I bought myself/my husband a Rolex."

Without fail, if I talk to someone I meet professionally who has a DJ, most especially a TT DJ, they have no clue about anything at all related to their watch, other than it was the expensive Rolex they finally treated themselves to.

On the other hand, if I see a guy with a Coke GMT or an Expy II, you can usually expect some interesting conversation. These guys tend to have learned more and shopped more for their watch, and tend to be quite frankly more discerning owners. They got the watch that wasn't the obvious choice pushed on them by an AD or bought for them by their wives.

My 2c.

And all that being said, no one in their right mind can argue that a Bluesy Sub (the original, not the smurfmariners) isn't gorgeous.
I wear a TT DJ, and I know quite a bit about Rolex history and my watch. I was never a fan of the Rolex sportwatches never had any use for them. A lot of people who buy Rolex's dont know much about them. Our group of WIS make up a very small % of the Rolex buying public. When I bought my Rolex I shopped around, and knew I wanted a 16233 DJ. I got one of the early 16233's made, a L-series early 1990 DJ 16233 with the 3135 movement and sapphire crystal.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 07:50 AM   #202
jizeal
"TRF" Member
 
jizeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: South Florida
Watch: neilswatches@gmail
Posts: 5,157
TT is for grandfathers
jizeal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 08:03 AM   #203
Time2time
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Joker View Post
TT is a dated 80's look, and you are just advertising the fact that you can't afford the full gold version.

And while I'm at it I think you can only pull off a full gold watch with gold bracelet if you are Tony Soprano or Elle Macpherson.

A gold watch with leather strap is hot though, not too over the top.

Stick with SS, it rules!
Unwanted? Really?
80's look? Really?

News to me. I know it's a personal opinion
but I think the TT looks better than the all gold!! IMHO of course.
Time2time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 11:08 AM   #204
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by jizeal View Post
TT is for grandfathers
Really? That's utter rubbish my friend

Look how nice this watch is
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=190838
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 11:24 AM   #205
oboshoe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cary, NC
Watch: YG Day Date
Posts: 72
Personally I don't care for TT watches.

1) I just don't prefer the aesthetics. I prefer SS, yellow gold or white gold.

2) TT bracelets exhibit more "stretch", as the harder SS grinds against the softer 18k. This result is that TT stretch more than all gold or SS.
oboshoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 11:25 AM   #206
sherwin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth/Singapore
Posts: 1,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by jizeal View Post
TT is for grandfathers
really? for me the 16233 was love at first sight!!

damn when i got my 16233 at the age of 18 (with my first paycheque)
__________________
Want to Buy:SS GMT black;116509 WG Daytona Metrorite
sherwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 11:32 AM   #207
Jinder
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
Personally, I feel the TT models are the best of the lot. Just looks cool in my eyes....
I never visioned TT as an old man watch, I find them classy.
The Date Just II and Sub/GMT TT models are just amazing.
IMO!
Jinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 11:47 AM   #208
gwozhog
"TRF" Member
 
gwozhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
Ok gold is now worth as much as platinum and that is because gold is back. I see the new bluesey selling for about 8600-9k on the second hand market now. That is up more than 10 percent from 3 months ago. Most TT watches are most likely purchased with a much more steeper discount from AD's right now so you can not go wrong.
gwozhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 12:15 PM   #209
brkanand
2024 Pledge Member
 
brkanand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: DrK
Location: India
Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk
Posts: 7,052
IMO SS reflects simplicity with total satisfaction. TT reflects a desire to move forward, a confused mind and an awareness of not having reached there. YG/WG confirms you are rich enough to buy an expensive watch, with an erroneous feeling of being successful but wanting more attention anyways!
brkanand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2011, 12:18 PM   #210
mocheen
"TRF" Member
 
mocheen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Aaron
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 187
I like TT watches as well, but my preference is for SS. I really like the white gold sub with the blue face.
mocheen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.